
We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 2,800 unique visits a day, and more than 44,000 page views a week (as of October 26). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get!
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Beaulieu, Georges De Latour Cabernet 1995
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, La Paulée, 2006
Woodbridge, Chardonnay
Paranga, Kir-Yianni 2005
L. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Rose 2007
Newman's Own, Cabernet 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Monte Antico, Toscana Red 2006
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Vins Auvigne, Macon-Fuisse 2007
Vina Gormaz, Tempranillo 2007
Chandon, Brut Classic
Dom Martinho, Tinto 2005
Chateau St. Jean, Cabernet, California 2007
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2007
Revelry, The Reveler, 2007
Joseph Drouhin, Chablis 2006
Altos Las Hormigas, Mendoza Malbec 2008
Alodio, Ribeira Sacra Mencia 2007
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2008
Kiona, Lemberger 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Columbia Valley Merlot 2005
Gloria Ferrer, Sonoma Brut
Kirkland, Napa Valley Meritage 2006
Abacela, Tempranillo 2006
Woodward Canyon, Columbia Valley Red
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2007
Mas Donis Barrica, Celler de Capcanes Red, 2005
Three Rivers, Merlot 2006
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Lezaun, Rosado, Navarra
Lezaun, Red, Navarra
Hedges, Three Vineyards, Red Mountain 2005
Raptor Ridge, Pinot Gris 2008
Vega Sindoa, Cabernet-Tempranillo 2006
Inama, Soave Classico 2007
Alois Lageder, Lagrein Rosato 2008
Broglia, Gavi 2007
Marqués de Cáceres, Rioja Rose 2008
Spaltagna, Riserva Pinot Noir 2008
Portuga, Rose 2008
Warre's Warrior Port
Lange, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Guiraud, Le G, 2007
Falset, Garnacha Rose, Montsant 2006
Castello di Bossi, Chianti Classico 2004
Domaine Chandon, Pinot Noir, La Riviere Sonoma 2006
Brazin, Old Vine Zinfandel, Lodi 2006
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2006
Casillero del Diablo, Cabernet 2007
Gentil Hugel, Alsace 2006
Mesoneros de Castilla, Ribero del Duero, Rosado 2008
Cor, Momentum 2007
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2006
Rubico, Lacrima di Morro d'Alba 2007
Gilstrap Brothers, Reserve Merlot 2003
Conundrum 2007
Chandler Reach, 36 Red
Santa Rita, Reserve Cabernet 2005
Marietta, Old Vine Red Lot 47
L'Ecole No. 41, Recess Red 2006
Dom Martinho, Red 2004
Beaulieu, Georges Latour 1994
Caymus, Cabernet 1995
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2005
Bergevin Lane, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2005
Savigny-les-Beaune, Les Lavieres 2003
David Hill, Reserve Merlot, Rogue Valley 2006
Educated Guess, Cabernet 2006
Maquis Lien, Red 2005
Charles Smith, Kung Fu Girl Riesling 2007
David Hill, Farmhouse White
Robert Mondavi Solaire, Cabernet 2005
Castello Monaci, Liante, Salice Salentino 2006
Ricardo Santos, Malbec 2006
Quinta da Espiga, Tinto 2006
Charles Smith, Holy Cow Merlot 2006
Charles Smith, Boom Boom Syrah 2006
Charles Smith, The Honorable Pinot Gris 2007
Santa Rita, Cabernet Reserva 2005
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2007
Gloria, Douro, Tinto 2002
Bogle, Petite Sirah Port, Clarksburg 2005
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Noir 2004
Silkwood, Red Duet Cabernet-Syrah 2004
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006, 2007
Osborne, Solaz 2004
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Reserva 2005
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill, Shiraz Cabernet 2006
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2004
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Horse Heaven Hills 2004
Hannah Nicole, Red 2004
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2005
Protocolo, Red 2005
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2006
Portuga, Vinho Branco 2006
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1996
Kirkland, Roogle Shiraz 2004
Garda, Classico Chiaretto
A to Z, Oregon Pinot Gris 2005
I Giusti & Zanza, Nemorino 2006
Treana, Marsanne-Viognier, Central Coast 2005
Fife, Syrah, "Stanford" 2000
B.R. Cohn, Silver Label Cabernet 2005
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 0
At this date last year: 0
Total run in 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (16)
"This time they say it's going to create 1500 new jobs" you bet!
750 Hotdog sellers, their assistants and they will all pay a vendor fee plus parking.
Posted by Abe | September 19, 2006 9:53 AM
This is it for me. I encourage everyone to vote against the metro park bond measure. If they are going to try and tax me for a multi-million dollar public hotel, why should I give them any money. Next will be a billion for a public financed baseball stadium to cover the losses of the hotel, just as the argument for the hotel will be to cover the convention center fiasco. I see this train a-coming.
Posted by mroc | September 19, 2006 10:23 AM
I know you may think the South Waterfront (SoWhat) development is morally bankrupt, but I wasn't aware it was technically bankrupt in a monetary sense.
Posted by Gordon | September 19, 2006 12:00 PM
Vote against the parks bond because you're mad about the Convention Center? That's like refusing to go to a restaurant because you don't like three of the nine things on the menu.
Posted by Gordon | September 19, 2006 12:02 PM
Inaccurate analogy. If a restaurant delivers a plate of food you didn't order they take it back free of charge. If they don't they lose customers. A vote against the metro bond is the same as choosing not to return to a restaurant because they don't listen to their customers. A few of their menu items may be tasty but in general they are overpriced and leave you with indigestion. They don't care what their constituency orders and everything is priced as "market" with the cost adjusting each bite.
Posted by Josh | September 19, 2006 12:36 PM
The SoWhat development is bankrupt in the sense that it is wildly over budget, and "no funding sources have been identified" for some of the basic infrastructure needs that are part of the basic plan for the place.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 19, 2006 1:35 PM
How can Portland ever go bankrupt if the citizens consistently support tax increases?
Posted by Mister Tee | September 19, 2006 4:07 PM
have any portlanders heard of the scandals in new jersey?
the mayor of newark and the medical school (umdnj) scandal....
as a visitor from new jersey (really, 3 weeks max), i sure hope portland will not end up like new jersey...for the cruel joke is democrat voters screwed by their own party !!!
Posted by enrico | September 19, 2006 7:49 PM
If I'm going to be taxed to build a hotel, then I want some equity. And comps...Like Vegas, baby: free rooms, free drinks, free shows.
If we just allowed the tribes to convert the convention center into a casino, the hotel would pay for itself and the city/county share of the take (ahem) -- I mean participation and taxes -- would let them open Wapato and pay the public employees even more generous salary and benefits.
C'mon Fireman Randy: if we could fully fund the Fire and Police Department sRetirement plan with a destination casino and no direct taxes on Portland's citizens, you wouldn't say no? Would you?
Posted by Mister Tee | September 19, 2006 8:23 PM
This is it for me. I encourage everyone to vote against the metro park bond measure. If they are going to try and tax me for a multi-million dollar public hotel, why should I give them any money.
Maybe we should stop feeding the animals at the zoo, too? After all, that's METRO's baby as well.
Let's deal with the issue of the Convention Center on its own. This bad idea --and METRO'S got lots of 'em--doesn't cancel out the value of saving open spaces in our rapidly (too rapidly) densifying area.
Posted by Frank Dufay | September 19, 2006 10:14 PM
This really pis**es me off. Another boondoggle like PGE park. Why should we have to pay foran ugly ass convention hotel for the business sector when those that want it have the money to build it themselves? Talk about welfare!
1500 jobs? The powers that be really think we're a bunch of sheep.
Posted by Loser | September 19, 2006 11:21 PM
Frank,
I think the problem here not enough people realize or accept that the same people pushing while lying about the CC hotel and other boondoggles like SoWa (and other UR schemes) are the same people who are promoting the rest of our transportation and land use policies, leading to the overcrowding congested mess we have.
The new Metro measure is another snow job. Few park facilities will actually result from it while millions will be poured into the coffers of the regions bad planning cabal with their activists groups getting handed millions to help continue bad policies such as this hotel and the upcoming transit mall.
It's all about Metro getting more money to sustain the status quo.
They'll syphon millions off the new bond money for administrative costs, distribute (pay off) millions to the local "community groups", increase the already abundant government real estate holdings, cause additional overcrowding of our region, neglect the needs of growth and further retard the ability of the region to recover from the damage they have already done.
By increasing the funding for the Metro Status quo and their activist groups every effort to bring about better planning will be thwarted.
The Columbia Crossing will be forced to include light rail, the Sunrise corridor will be intentionally congested, Sellwood bridge rebuild without traffic relief,
no 217 expansion will occur, no I-5/99 connector will be built, more light rail,
Transit oriented development and Urban renewal schemes will suck up basic services resources and we'll have a few more acres of wetlands which we already have plenty preserved.
SoWa and the Beaverton Round are big success stories accourding to the Metro propoganda machine.
If you buy that by all means vote for their new scam measure.
With all the needs and money issues on the ballot this is by far the most ill-advised and least needed.
Posted by Steve Schopp | September 20, 2006 8:25 AM
Frank of course the animals should be fed. Personally I would feed them the developers, planning bureau and the Goldschmidt Gang. You keep falling for the densitification machine scam, which is self induced and you know damn well this is only the lead up to the baseball stadium. Hell even Paul Allen will be in on this one. The mayor has it right. NO PUBLIC Financed Hotel OR Stadium
Posted by mroc | September 20, 2006 10:51 AM
It's all about Metro getting more money to sustain the status quo.
I don't get, Steve, how saving land from development represents the "status quo" or even how it contributes to density and congestion.
At any rate, its one thing to take a stand against the measure because you don't support its outcome. I respect that opinion. What I think is silly is to oppose the measure because of something unrelated, like the Convention Center Hotel. I just can't buy that METRO folks are evil and everything they do, therefore, becomes tainted and unclean.
I agree with you sometimes, Steve, and on some things I don't. METRO does good things, and bad things, as, I suspect do most of us.
I'd love to see major league baseball in Portland. And usually I think Jack sarcastically misuses the word "socialism"...but METRO owning a hotel? I don't think that's the role of government. What's next, renting rooms by the hour?
Posted by Frank Dufay | September 20, 2006 8:08 PM
I'd hate to see major league baseball. It would just be more welfare for those who don't need it (baseball team owners, players, developers, etc. you name it, if there's money to be mooched the usual suspects - wealthy sleazeballs who know how to play the game - will be there with their hands out) courtesy of PORTLAND taxpayers. Sure, Portland residents will pay and pay and pay for the cheapskates outside the city to benefit. AS USUAL.
Hello? Maybe we taxpayers should get a chance to payoff the PGE Park payoff first.
Posted by Loser | September 21, 2006 12:08 AM
Frank said,
"""I'd love to see major league baseball in Portland"""
Too bad Portland is wasting every dime for a stadium on SoWa cost overruns alone.
Something which Metro fully condones.
That's what you don't get. Metro is fully connected to the most eggregious decisions this region has made and the waste they directly or indirectly cause is massive.
I contend they are also wholy dishonest
in their efforts to continue the status quo with their new measure.
Right along with TriMet the perpetual schemes and con jobs are moving along unabated.
Posted by Steve Schopp | September 23, 2006 7:46 AM