Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 20, 2006 11:07 AM. The previous post in this blog was Question No. 3. The next post in this blog is It's this weekend. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

Potter serves up some Kool Aid

"Fully realizing the potential of the North Macadam area in no way precludes or diminishes the work we are also doing to improve neighborhoods in Cully or Lents or anywhere else in Portland," Potter responded.

He adds that the greenway, parks and other public investments will benefit all Portlanders.

"Redeveloping this area helps reclaim our riverfront for everyone," Potter says.

And our local Pulitzer winner rattles it all back, fairly uncritically. Oh, he quotes some of the critics, but the final score is 75 SoWhat Good to 25 SoWhat Bad.

Especially galling is the assertion that the OHSU aerial tram [rim shot] -- the biggest waste of money in Oregon history -- is now "irrelevant." Yeah, like Osama Bin Laden.

Hey, these guys think Opie is a genius, and so I guess I'm not surprised.

Comments (22)

"Redeveloping this area helps reclaim our riverfront for everyone," Potter says.

He forgot the last part of the script "...for everyone of my friends who can profit from this BILLION DOLLAR mistake."

Now let me get this straight...
A. The Aerial Tram is for a few physicians and OHSU employes at at cost of over $52 million.

B. Homer Williams receives $5M for housing block (49) after paying only $1.2M for the same block over a year ago. (Where were our astute Mayor, Commissioners and planners when that deal was sealed?)

C. Homer Williams receives $3 million for the rights to build housing above the OHSU parking garage before the city determines the appraisal of that same block comes in it at $1.5 million. (Need we say... RECALL Potter, Opie and everyone else, then fire a bunch on City Planning?)

D. We find out that SoWhat is short another $170 million, which adds up to an additional $309 from every man, woman, and child in town.

I'm just glad that Mayor Potter doesn't want to "Reclaim any more of Portland" I can't afford it. I've got to keep food on my kid's plate... "Sorry, daughter. I can't afford food, but would you like to take a ride on the new tram? Invite a few friends and we can make it a girls day out."

Wait, the tram is irrelevant? What about the vital linchpin part? Maybe this has been a new bio-research project after all. We've been studying how much BS a group of city-business partners can shovel.

Sorry, once he quoted Mark Gardiner (who along with Glickman's boy, got Vera to bankroll PGE Park for $35M) as an expert, he just lost all credibility in my book.

We can always re-name Opie as Super Dupey!

this part is precious:

"To obtain what amounted to very valuable air rights, Williams agreed to make the footprints of his buildings smaller. Then last year, realizing he'd surrendered too much, he persuaded the council to let him increase the footprint."

ummm.. meaning he swindled everyone?

oh and, carol, its not $309 per person, its probably something like an allocation of $10 a year for 20 years per person.

George: since the amount of money is inconsequential, would you persuade our City Elders to devote that same amount to improving all the sand & gravel streets in our neighborhoods.

Why should the luxury condo owners get all the new transportation investment, while the rest of Portland is littered with lousy secondary streets?

If not, would you mind sending your families contributions my way, instead. Baby needs a new pair of shoes.

once he quoted Mark Gardiner (who along with Glickman's boy, got Vera to bankroll PGE Park for $35M) as an expert, he just lost all credibility in my book.

Mark's a bright guy, though an odd choice to be someone quoted on this.

What's funny about the Civic Stadium debacle is we got upset when the insiders were gonna make a windfall...then got upset when the whole thing fell apart and people lost their shirts. Deals, plans and schemes go south all the time in the private sector...why should we be surprised they sometimes blow up in the public sector as well? The Park's certainly a more valuable asset these days.

Why should the luxury condo owners get all the new transportation investment, while the rest of Portland is littered with lousy secondary streets?

That is fundamentally the question, as much as I generally disagree with the person who posed the question. There's an equity issue here --all the other stuff aside-- that's very troubling.

"What's funny about the Civic Stadium debacle is we got upset when the insiders were gonna make a windfall...then got upset when the whole thing fell apart and people lost their shirts."

Explain to me how Gardiner lost his shirt. He didn't lose credibility since PERS hired him on the board.

Gardiner/Glickman had not a clue about how to run a baseball team/stadium. They just kissed up to Vera, she shoved thru $35M to update CIvic Stadium (which, surprise, would not be good enough when she thought they could get a pro team.)

Then stuff went south (actually never went north)and unless I am mistaken, I (as a taxpayer) am paying for this and Mr Gardiner is at a new job. Don't confuse bright with ethical.

Explain to me how Gardiner lost his shirt.

I'm no expert on the wheeling and dealing on this, and can't explain or substantiate how any individual won or lost, or how much. My recollection is a number of investors lost a lot of money. But that's as concrete as I can get.

He didn't lose credibility since PERS hired him on the board.

Like I said Mark's really bright. As is his wife, Mary Nolan, who's also in the legislature. I'd sooner see Mark on the PERS board then, oh, I don't know...George Bush?

But Mark's also a partner with Homer Williams, I've heard, on some high tech start-up...something Willamette Week didn't catch.

I guess I only wanted to suggest that we're pretty critical --as we should be-- but it seems like 9 out of 10 "big projects" --and, yeah, ballparks-- never seem to play out as proposed and envisioned. Cost over-runs and bad decision making plague even the likes of Paul what's-his-face.

George, you can pick any word you want-"swindled", "lobbied", "call in your chits", etc., but Homer and other developers "convinced" the City Council to throw out the four Standards that somewhat modified the so-called "pinpoint towers" so that there was a token of permeability in North Macadam. The floor plate of each floor for buildings was limited to 10,000 sq.ft.-it was increased to 12,500 sq.ft.-a 25% increase. The distance between buildings of 200 ft. was scrapped. You get the picture. And don't forget that FAR density was increased SIX times in rezoning the previous years.

So besides getting 325ft high buildings, the massing, density was increased by 25%. This is after 10 years of planning, City Councils NM Plan adoption in 2001, then a year later the Council changes the rules again. What do you call it?

Also, as posted elsewhere your $10 dollars per year for 20 years is totally false, for the taxpayers cost for NM. The taxpayers costs are approaching $1.5BILLION. You seem to be forgetting many things, besides the debt costs for the borrowing required for an Urban Renewal area.

I hope you don't assume when you buy a car on credit that the agreed sale price of the car at $25,000 is the price you actually pay for the car. If you extended your car payments out over 20 years (minimum UR length for NM, and probably will be extended because the TIF income is not matching that projected) your car cost is not $25,000, but maybe $125,000 depending on your interest rate.

One thing that Nigel did not make too clear in his article is that some of his cost numbers were only for the Central District of the whole North Macadam Urban Renewal area. There are three areas to the district. The central area is about one-third of the whole developable area in the District. The whole district budget for the identified projects is almost $300M. Please see past post of additional cost consideration (tax dollars) that makes $1.5 BILLION realistic, and why $2,275.00 dollars per each person, including our children, for our subsidy to NM is feasible and not your $200 dollars.

It'd be nice if Portlanders could afford to live in Portland. Who buys these riverfront "luxury" condos? Do they even live here year round?

I think the weakest sentence in the article is about Homer Williams and the size of the buildings: "Then last year, realizing he'd surrendered too much, he persuaded the council to let him increase the footprint." Now, that could be 100% true. This man whose credentials had just been described - the towers in Los Angeles, the nose for opportunity - somehow could have gotten snookered by the Corbett-Terwilliger-Lair Hill Neighborhood Association. Forgive me for being cynical, but it was reminiscent of the tram budget which was later called a guesstimate. That could have been true too, but sometimes developers and others submit numbers to get a project started, then return later with the real, revised numbers. Nigel could have written that Homer "claimed" that he only realized this later. Sure, it was a gigantic project for him, but maybe he only made a guesstimate about it the first time when he "surrendered too much". Maybe he was in a hurry, like one of the council's later excuses. But if Nigel had added the word "claimed" and it was, in fact, a deliberate strategy by a slick developer who knew the city council was on a string, well, then, the sentence would still be accurate. Instead, it reads like the developer's words are not to be questioned, which is way too trusting for a Pulitzer Prize winner.

"Cost over-runs and bad decision making plague even the likes of Paul what's-his-face."

OK, but I am saying government should be focused on basic services like potholes, parks and police. If Paul wants to blow his own money fine.

However, when Gardiner convinces Vera to shove this thing (and Civic Stadium is not the only venture like this) thru without voter approval or even City Council approval, then I think we need to say no.

Almost every time there is any speculative venture and if city money is involved, the city gets its butt kicked.

Moreover, if they blow taxpayer money, what's the penalty for Vera and Gardiner? A fate like Lay and Skilling? No - retirement and a good paying job.

It just drives me nuts when the city does not want to do the boring jobs running the city, but thinks they can play developer or financier, when they have no experience or training in either. This usually means we get stuck with higher taxes or starving basic services to pay for these bad ideas.

"I'd sooner see Mark on the PERS board then, oh, I don't know...George Bush?"

So, our only choice is Gardiner or Bush out of 300M people? How about someone who speaks for the taxpayers and actually has some real world finance experience and hasn't spent his life in the public sector.

Mark Gardiner is on the Oregon Investment Council, not the PERS Board.

let me address some of the strawman arguments here:

1. i never said that the total or partial amount of money for NM was of no consequence. or that the spending is properly prioritized. is there another george posting invisible comments?

2. i never claimed that my $10 per person allocation for 20 years represents the total cost of NM. (the $10 over 20 is probably a little under cause i didnt calculate interest into there, but i worked in some higher assumptions for other aspects. its hard to work in interest cause the $170 million will be spent over 20 years, if its all spent in the last minute of the last year for example, there will be no interest.)

i am just standing by that as a more accurate number for the specific $170 million transportation upgrades that bojack was talking about many posts ago. think of it as a stand in for the $309 cost per person number that was thrown around before. a number i have not seen defended by anyone.

the reason why i think this is important is that the discourse here seems a little clouded at times regarding govt spending. as in, some people refer to things they would buy if they could have their "$309" back. sorry, its not your money, it never was. and thats not even the right number!

to me the problem is a misallocation of funds, that the neighborhood could have been built slower. more simply. and they could have followed the rules. and probably worst of all, the deal was done in a way that concealed information from the public- which is harmful for democracy.

George, again you have your numbers wrong. The $170M plus that Adams admits is lacking for just the transportation improvements identified in NM's project list, is mostly outside of the $300M NM budget. You may want to review the PDC website and be more knowledgable about the real numbers for NM. And even then, since PDC has not been able to come up with a realistic spreadsheet for the proposed 5 year budget, that even its own NM URAC is demanding, it is difficult to get a grasp of the correct numbers.

Even many of the "stakeholders" on the URAC are upset about the lack of clarity of the 5 year budget, and not reflecting all the costs in the 20 year URA project list. If you examine the 5 year budget/project list from 2001 you'll discover that several transportation projects that were to be started/completed by 2006 are not even planned yet. And then on the proposed updated 2006 5 year budget, PDC didn't even list the costs or fund sources for the transportation projects. Plus, they even forgot the North Portal (RiverPlace) transportation project that could be $20M-oops.

I agree with you that a slower pace, and more simplicity would be desirable. Cities of 15,000 souls take time to digest, and time brings flavor to the built environment. Instant cities have generally never been very successful-look at all the other urban renewal examples throughout the US that proves this point, and even in Portland's first UR project-South Portland.

Having partially digested the long WW piece, I'm a little puzzled.

We all read that schools and hospitals are perennially in the red. Isn't OHSU fundamentally a school and a hospital?

The WW piece assigns nearly $50M of "investment" for SoWhat to OHSU. Where does that money come from? Is it money laundered from tuitions and medical fees?

Am I right in thinking, the OHSU board is the final authority on what OHSU involves itself in, including "investment" schemes, and that the board serves at the pleasure of the governor?

Potter is turning out to be worth every cent of that five dollar campaign donation. You get what you pay for.

Pretty f***ng disingenous to attempt to distill the entire SoWhat development into "greenway, parks, other public investment." Other public investment like $5 million dollar, 5,000 square-foot condos, health clubs for our medical overlords, zero biotech jobs, probably dozens of low-paying restaurant jobs, to which we will drive from our affordable housing units in Gresham.

And again, So What development "in no way precludes or diminishes the work we are also doing to improve neighborhoods in Cully or Lents or anywhere else in Portland." Yeah that is why there is so much going on up here north of Fremont and east of 33rd. We are getting so excited by all of the development, that the cops have to come up to calm us down with billy clubs and tasers. The other day, I saw some guys paving a patch of NE Skidmore, and couldn't believe it; but it turns out it was just the natural gas company covering up some of the work they had done.

So can the attempts to shroud your Tommany Hall antics in pseudo-socialist rhetoric. It is quite apparent whom is benefited by SoWa.

Even though the ball was rolling on this scam (or series thereof) many years ago, the 2004 council elections were a huge step forward for the Homer Williams welfare state.

Sam and Tom, you guys s*ck.

"George, again you have your numbers wrong. The $170M plus that Adams admits is lacking for just the transportation improvements identified in NM's project list, is mostly outside of the $300M NM budget. "

correct. and i am not sure how i communicated that i thought it was inside that budget. when i said " specific $170 million transportation upgrades" i was refering to the same thing that you are referring to.

anyway, glad that we agree elsewhere...

Did we read the same WW article? I hardly think it sounds "fairly uncritical." The developers don't exactly come off very well, and no one reading the article is going to think they're saints. Perhaps it wasn't critical enough for some of the fiercest critics here, but the article did seem to illuminate some of the biggist problems with the SW project - massive infusions of cash from the city based on dubious projections from developers - in pretty stark terms.

M., perhaps because you work for the State of Oregon, anything short of glowing praise of government waste seems like criticism to you.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics