Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 29, 2006 10:55 AM. The previous post in this blog was Rosa Parks Way. The next post in this blog is Weekend project. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, September 29, 2006

How you feelin' today?

Ashamed? Me too.

Comments (47)

Yesterday will go down in history as a dark day for America. I can only hope this gets before the Supremes - but without habeas corpus, how will anyone get legal standing to challenge it? Call it Catch-23, because it even beats Catch-22...

How many lines in the sand have we had? How many times do we have to reassure ourselves "It can't get any worse"?

How can we not be affected and saddened that our country has been turned on it's head in the span of 6 years. Up is down, left is right. The GOP says the sky is purple, and the next day the media prints it.

When this desperate and criminal legislation gets struck down by the Supreme Court, the media better damn well hold all the 'aye's' feet to the fire. Gordon Smith, are you sure you're on the right side of history and law?

Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, Savage... these Goebbel-ite propagandists deserve nearly as much responsibility. They've managed to convince many Americans that compromising our freedom, liberties, legal system, world opinion, and moral high ground is in our best interests. That racism and theocracy are OK. That the GOP is the party of fiscal responsibility and national security. Their opinions would be hillarious if the effect weren't so grave. I hope they sleep well at night, in their estates their selfish lies have built. Well, I know Rush will sleep well, thanks to Oxycontin...

Stop it Jack, please, you're TORTURING us!

But seriously. Had enough?

Vote Demo.

"Rush, O'Reilly, Hannity, Savage.."

These guys are a problem all right. But what is most sinister about them, imo, is that they are taking advantage of Americans' legitimate gripes with newsmedia coverage to make it appear they are "The Answer".

Seems to me the 'habeas corpus' argument against the bill is much ado about nothing. It only applies to "aliens", not American Citizens. In past conflicts, did we give foreign prisoners of war access to our Federal courts?

Yesterday was the day I was dreading - the day when war crimes became legal. The day that Justice left town. We now exist at the pleasure of the executive branch. Our best hope is that this group of power-mad buffoons will choose to restrain themselves. This law certainly doesn't restrain them.
As for the right-wing extremists who somehow think it's macho to give up your rights to fight terrorism, you will go down in history as some of the worst cowards ever. People in actual frightening scenarios like Omaha Beach died to keep these freedoms, and you - while not really facing anything scary yourselves in an immediate sense - have sold those heros out.
You are liberty sluts. You gave it up way too easy.

Wooooo Bill!

"The Habeas Corpus secures every man here, alien or citizen, against everything which is not law, whatever shape it may assume." — Thomas Jefferson to A. H. Rowan, 1798.

Habeas has been interpreted to apply regardless of citizenship up until now.

It does seem that this bill leaves habeas intact for American citizens - at least until Congress gives the Decider the power to arbitrarily revoke citizenship. Better keep your papers on you at all times, volks.

The word Ashamed isn't strong enough to describe the sickening feeling I have. The truly sad part is that there are so many Americans out there who believe our reaction to this event is hysterical and unpatriotic. And I would wager that at least 50% of the country is unaware that anything has happened--this is probably a very low estimate.

Hey, it's not so bad--the only people who can be tortured are enemy combatants.

Problem: the President now has authority to declare anyone (including American citizens) an enemy combatant, and can also declare retroactively that what was done to them was not torture.

Hey Butch. The Writ of Habeus Corpus is the last refuge of the downtrodden and desperate against the tremendous weight of the power of the largest government known to humanity. The existence of an individual's chance to be heard by the judiciary is a fundamental check against abuse by the executive branch. You use the terms "alien" and "prisoner of war". The way the law is written, you or I could be snatched off the street, labeled an "alien prisoner of war", and never have an opportunity to challenge that fact in a court of law. Nobody wants terrorists to take advantage of our sense of decency, especially when they show no respect for life, liberty and justice in return. However, supporting the spiral downward into a "the ends justifies the means" mentality makes us apologists for the fascist thugs who have no respect for the balance of power. Doing the right thing isn't always easy, but if we turn away from the light we run the risk of entering into a darkness from which there may be no return.

I believe the bill defines "alien" as a non-US citizen. And as I asked above, In past conflicts, did we give foreign or non-US citizen prisoners of war access to our Federal courts? If not, what has changed?

Yet another sad step as the President steers his Republican lapdogs along the path toward the concept of a "unitary executive". The acquiescence of the legislative body in deferring to the executive in interpretations of the Constitution and laws is despicable.

Do you think the right wing would still feel the same way if a future president would change the interpretation of the Second Amendment to a more literal meaning and prohibit private ownership of firearms?

"as I asked above, In past conflicts, did we give foreign or non-US citizen prisoners of war access to our Federal courts? If not, what has changed?"

One of the things that has changed, Butch, is the nature of the conflict. It is not nearly as clear now as it was in WW II, for instance, whether the supposed "enemy combatants" whom the US military and law enforcement agencies are incarcerating are actually our enemies. For one thing, they're usually not wearing enemy uniforms; for another, they can be found any place in the world. In many cases, those who are imprisoned as we carry out our potentially endless and boundless "war on terror" are imprisoned by mistake. The horrifying story of Canadian citizen Maher Arar--arrested at JFK, “renditioned” to Syria, tortured for 10 months, later determined to be innocent of any wrongdoing--is a case in point. How many other such mistakes are being made? How many more will be made in the future now that the executive branch is officially being given free reign? Without the writ of habeas corpus, what mechanism is there for preventing mistakes in capture from turning into the torture and endless imprisonment of innocent people?

Your fundamental error in how you're looking at this situation is your assumption that only the guilty, only the real combatants, are being arrested. There would be no need for any kind of post-arrest justice system, military or domestic, if those whom we empower to provide security had a foolproof ability to capture only the guilty. Once captured, the prisoner's sentence would simply commence. But, obviously, our cops and soldiers don't have that kind of God-like ability. Therefore, one of our most basic obligations as a decent society is to protect innocent people from the most awful consequences of human error.

I believe any President can and could - in times of emergency - declare Martial Law and confiscate firearms.

So....were they 'Democrat lapdogs' that stood by and watched as Clinton authorized warrantless ransaking of a US Citizen's private home? Or when he began the practice of rendition - sending prisoners to foreign countries that practiced REAL torture? Or when his Justice Department burned down a religeous commune? Or when he authorized the largestest government data mining and monitoring program history?

The selective outrage is getting mighty deep around here. Time to put on my hip waders.

Damn right, I'm ashamed.

Can someone please explain Gordon Smith's logic to me?

But seriously. Had enough?
Vote Demo.

And what about these turkeys, Daphne?

I consider myself a Democrat, but these guys make me wonder how meaningful that is these days.

Carper (D-DE), Yea
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Lieberman (D-CT), Yea
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Yea
Pryor (D-AR), Yea
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Salazar (D-CO), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea

It is possible that innocent foreigners may be imprisoned erroneously for an undetermined period of time. I'm willing to believe these "false terrorists" may even represent 5% of the total.

I can live with that, knowing that the remaining 95% represent such a grave and irrational threat to the United States that we can't risk giving them a fair trial.

It is in the best interests of the United States to release the innocent ASAP: they are occupying valuable real estate that should be reserved for a legitimate terrorist. The challenge is encouraging the military/intelligence community to admit/audit their own mistakes.

The American principle of justice was founded on the notion that it's better to let 99 guilty men go free rather than convict one innocent man. I believe that 99:1 ratio is untenable. I am willing to "convict" (detain indefinitely) 5 innocent men, in order to enhance the probability the 95 "high probability" guilty ones never see the inside of an American Courthouse.

"It is possible that innocent foreigners may be imprisoned erroneously for an undetermined period of time. I'm willing to believe these "false terrorists" may even represent 5% of the total.

I can live with that. . ."

How did you come up with the figure of 5 percent false arrests, Mr. T? It seems that you've decided that this is the figure you can "live with," so that's what you choose to believe. Interesting approach. Can you "live with" 50 percent false arrests? How about 95 percent? How about if the person falsely arrested were you, or your child or your wife? How about if you were arrested and you had to "live with" the arrest while you were being tortured?

Are these ridiculous questions? I don't think so. In conceiving of a justice system, we have to try to imagine that we--you and I--are the possible victims of government mistakes and lack of accountability.

I am willing to "convict" (detain indefinitely) 5 innocent men, in order to enhance the probability the 95 "high probability" guilty ones never see the inside of an American Courthouse.

Wow. How sad for you that you'be become so scared of your own shadow that you've lost all notions of fairness and justice.

Lock up the innocent as a strategy for making America stronger? The worst thing of don't even get how that's a recipe for disaster and only serves the terrorists.

Frank Dufay: "Lock up the innocent as a strategy for making America stronger?"

Well Frank, it has worked for the criminal justice system in this country, don't you agree? Its not perfect, but everyone knows a percentage of convicts in our prisons today are indeed innocent. No system is 100% perfect.

But by your and Richard's logic, we should abolish our criminal justice system because it sometimes allows the innocent to be imprisoned. Lets turn 'em all loose tomorrow!

Any analogy between our farookin' prison camp in Cuba and a "criminal justice system" is faulty.

How is the analogy faulty?

One of the few history lessons I remember vividly is when my class read a passage about the King of England traveling to London. The teacher asked for the one little detail that spoke volumes about the state of the monarchy. See, along the route the King had gone through a village and settled a dispute by executing a man on the spot. The whole point was that he still had absolute power. I would suggest being able to declare anyone an enemy combatant - including American citizens - and then having the legal right to torture them in some secret hellhole forever, is about the same thing. Especially since you are legally protected should the torture you do go too far and cause death - and someone outside the gulag happened to find out about it. By the way, torturing people to death is something we have already done in Iraq prisons. Think about that. Our country has already tortured people to death. Saddam must be impressed.

So while the hopeless Bush suck-ups nod their heads in reverential agreement, this sadistic brat W. has taken us back to a type of monarchy before the rise of Parliament. Coincidentally torture was a big part of the legal system back then, too.

Remember that feeling heading into the new millennium? Who knew it would lead back to the Dark Ages?

How is the analogy faulty?

Uh, let's see. There's the word "criminal," when no charges are filed anywhere. And there's "justice," which when you mention it in the same breath as The Chimp in Chief is truly laughable.

Oh...I see. So where do the words "terrorist" and "war" fit in? No 'criminal' charges are filed in our courts because in many instances the charges involve classified information that if revealed would jeopardise National Security....information that could be leaked to the enemy by accused terrorists' defense attorneys (as has already happened since 9/11).

Jack, how many confirmed civil liberties violations has this administration committed according to the ACLU? Zippo.

BTW - rhetoric about "justice" and "the chimp" does little to advance your position.


What if you could have detained the 19 Al Qaeda hijackers on September 10th, together with a single innocent citizen of Saudi Arabia or Yemen.

You imprisoned 20 people as non-national enemy combatants, sans writ of habeas corpus, and used aggressive interrogation tactics to learn the nature of their foiled plot, their financiers, and the names/places of all known associates.

Granted, you wrongly imprisoned one innocent man together with the 19 aspiring hijackers. And you pissed off the ACLU, Amnesty International, and most liberals.
But 3,000 lives were spared on September 11th. Let's assume (for the sake of argument) that their confessions were all obtained under duress, or were not admissable in court.

You successfully prevented the attacks of September 11th, but now you have 20 foreign nationals rotting in GITMO, and no proof their outrageous plot would have succeeded.

Would you want to subject these 20 men to a court of law that may cut them loose? Would you feel responsible if they came back a few years later (having been exonerated), and attacked the U.S. with backpack bombs?

Butch - the analogy you suggested is crazy. Nobody is advocating getting rid of our justice system because of its imperfections... we're advocating APPLYING THE JUSTICE SYSTEM BECAUSE HUMANS ARE FLAWED!!!

Mr Tee - Winning/Surviving is not more important than principle. Some people would rather die, or let millions die, than legalize torture (or "aggressive interrogation practices"). 99:1 isn't worth it. Stopping 9/11 wouldn't have been worth it. Winning the "war" on terror will never be worth it. Nothing is worth it. Terroists cannot destroy our country. They can only kill us. We, however, can destroy our country if we quit acting like Americans.

By the way, when did Congress declare war? This is not a war. Terrorists are criminals, like those guys in Colorado and Florida, not "enemy combatants."

What if you could have detained the 19 Al Qaeda hijackers on September 10th, together with a single innocent citizen of Saudi Arabia or Yemen.

"What if..." What a load of crapola.

As though everything President Bush touches didn't turn to horse manure. He can't find his ass --let alone bin Laden--in the dark.

I'll play "what if" with you. What if...we held politicians responsible for their actions? And when they fail to protect us, when they get our citizens killed, send our troops to early, pointless deaths...what if we put them on trial for lying to the American people and Congress which, in my book, isn't just an impeachable offense, it's a form of treason. (And how much DO the Bush's still have invested in Saudi Arabia...the financiers of the jihadists when the CIA runs out of cash?)

What if...we had a president who didn't say "I don't think about bin Laden" but instead made putting bin Laden's sorry ass behind bars his NUMBER ONE priority?

Get a grip. What the Senate did with this nonsense is not just damage our country's standing in the world, but it gives the terrorist demagogues more fodder for their pr war against the neo-cons imperial ambitions. Sadly, that leaves the American people stuck in the middle, between two sets of crazies...

Winning/surviving is the only thing that matters. It is a national/biological imperative.

Sacrifices of life, liberty, and treasure are the only way to defeat Islamo-Fascism.

Those who would prefer to let millions die can vote for the Democrats in November. Beware the Michael Dukakis/Bernie Shaw debate trap: intellectual consistency can sound a bit hollow when you're debating the violent death of a loved one.

I believe the majority of Americans would have taken extreme measures if 9/11 could have been avoided. I believe this "fear factor" was the wedge issue which allowed Bush to defeat Kerry. We know where George Bush stands; Kerry was all over the map.

The American principle of justice was founded on the notion that it's better to let 99 guilty men go free rather than convict one innocent man. I believe that 99:1 ratio is untenable. I am willing to "convict" (detain indefinitely) 5 innocent men, in order to enhance the probability the 95 "high probability" guilty ones never see the inside of an American Courthouse.

Wow. We know for a fact that this is not what WWP's father [unlike his son, deeply conservative, Texan, and Republican] shed blood for in World War II. Of course, 99 guilty men shall go free rather than convict one innocent man. When did this fail to be a basic tenet of American belief? James Madison must be spinning in his grave.

If we've descended this far, we deserve a fate in hell. God help us.

Butch and Mr. T,

Neither of you have any idea of what you talk about. I doubt you would hold so stead fast to your beliefs if you witnessed first hand the policies you advocate.

Sounds like someone who has really fought for this country in Iraq or Afghanistan as opposed to people who sound tough in the Rose Garden. Right on, Travis.

If we've descended this far, we deserve a fate in hell. God help us.


How is it that people are comparing detainees to convicts? The whole problem with this bill, this President, this country is that we are not allowing due process. Convicts have/had it. They can appeal. They get their day in court. They actually are convicted. They have/had a chance. Why do some people think that denying due process and torturing people is somehow protecting this country?!?

God help us. Seriously.

Funny thing: I am taking the LSAT tomorrow. I always thought I'd study constitutional and/or criminal law. Now it seems that constitutional law is growing obsolete. Perhaps international and criminal law is the way to go. I've got two words for you, George W. Bush: war crimes.

I learned from the School of the Americas that sometimes you never really know who the enemy is until they disappear.

Yup, you liberals are correct, this bill is horrible. Instead, we should have passed something akin to what the old testament said, "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth." Instead we should be doing to the ones that we capture what they do to us, "off with their head".

So seriously, since the terrorists AREN'T a government and don't represent a country and (for the most part) aren't American citizens, then why give them the privledges that our CITIZENS get? Do you want them to vote next?

Do you want them to vote next?

No way! They'd all be voting Republican...

Ellie: "we deserve a fate in Hell, God help us." I don't think Al Zawahiri could have said it any better himself. You forgot the "Death to Zionists" part. Were you educated in Saudi Arabia by any chance?

Google returned the following citation of a schoolbook for Saudi fifth graders:

The religions which people follow on this earth are many, but the only true religion is the religion of Islam. As for the other religions, they are false as mentioned in the Koran (the Sura of Aal Umran Verse 85):"And whoever follows a religion that is not Islam, it will not be accepted from him and in the Hereafter he will be of the losers." The religion of Islam we know from the Koran and the Hadiths about the Prophet. The whole world should convert to Islam and leave its false religions lest their fate will be hell. As mentioned in the Koran (the Sura of Al-Nihal Verse 125):"[I swear] by Him who holds Muhammad's soul in his hand that not one Jew or Christian who had heard me and did not believe in the message that I was sent with shall die without being one of those whose fate is hell."

I am inclined to agree with Mmmarvel: holding them indefinitely at GITMO seems far more humane than killing them on the battlefield or beheading them on videotape.

That said, I am in favor of moral relativism becoming more of a two way street: if Islamic Law allows for their punishment to include chopping off their hands or stoning them to death, I am willing to do so in support of enhancing our cultural awareness.

It appears that the crazy, fanatic, criminals who carried out 9/11 5 yrs ago. fulfilled their mission.

"I am willing to do so in support of enhancing our cultural awareness."

Have you been transfered to Gitmo now, Mr. T? So you're actually going to be be-heading dark skinned people who have not been charged with any crime? Wow, that's so cool! You are one tough hombre. Thanks for all your hard work.

"Sacrifices of life, liberty, and treasure are the only way to defeat Islamo-Fascism."

And we greatly appreciate your sacrifices for us on the front line, Mr. T. Benjamin Franklin would be so proud of you and your dismissive attitute toward liberty. Thank you!

I'm pleased and reassured that so many, WWP and Jack included, are upset about this country's continued slide into facism. Too bad we'll all end up in Guantanamo. This was a country to be admired, once.

Oh Sam, don't ever question the sacrifice from the 101st Fighting Keyboardists Brigade. They support the troops, damnit. They're sacrificing precious bandwidth and credibility back here at home, so the troops can fight a pointless war over there!

Why do those libruls have to remind people that Iraq is now in a civil war? Insurgent attacks averaging over 100 a day now... why can't they report on happy news like the widespread reconstruction contract fraud, er... i mean, the NEW BOWLING ALLEY in Baghdad's green zone! Wooo!

(disclaimer: I made up the bowling alley thing. The widespread reconstruction f-ups by this administration, however, are very real...and costly, and illegal, and fraudulent, and well documented).

If you think this Administration could actually get a bowling alley built, you're an incurable optimist.,0,6389587.story?coll=la-home-headlines

for those who doubt what's at stake.

All they are say-ing, is give bombs a chance...

I have no doubt what is at stake--that is our great country being so frightened by some religious freaks with bombs that we give up our constitutional freedoms won and defended in many horrible wars over the last 200 plus years.

Y'all ought to read the legislation before you take to the bunkers or start filling your Molotovs.

It is very limited in scope. It doesn't apply to U.S. Citizens.

Assuming "we" doesn't include terror suspects and jihadists caught on the field of battle, then "we" haven't given up one iota of constitutional freedoms.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics