Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 19, 2006 12:52 AM. The previous post in this blog was And now, the filthy lucre. The next post in this blog is Feel like I just gotta travel on. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, September 19, 2006

Here come da judge

Oregon has a new state Supreme Court justice -- Martha Lee Walters from Eugene. Stories about her appointment can be found here and here. A bio on a Harvard-related site says:

Ms. Martha Walters is a partner with Walters, Romm, Chanti & Dickens in Eugene, Ore., where her civil litigation practice emphasizes employment law, personal injury,domestic relations, civil rights and municipal law. Ms. Walters attended the University of Michigan for her bachelor's degree, before moving on to receive her law degree from the University of Oregon School of Law in 1977. Her professional affiliations include service on the Boards of Directors of the Oregon Trial Lawyers Association and the Lane County Bar Association, as well as membership on the Oregon State Bar Disciplinary Board, the Judicial Conference of the Ninth Circuit, and the Lane County Local Professional Responsibility Committee. She has been a Commissioner of the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws since 1992.
A woman, a plaintiffs' attorney, an advocate for workers -- that ought to help the Gov in this election season. But it's another Willamette Valley voice, and one with no judicial experience to boot, and you can bet you'll hear a few catcalls about that.

Comments (21)

The return of a woman to the state's high court could change the dynamics of the current contest for another seat on the court, between Ginny Linder and Jack Roberts. I would think that with some of the pressure taken off the gender issue, this could help Roberts, a Republican. Ted may have helped himself at Linder's expense.


JOB DESCRIPTION: The successful candidate will be appointed to Oregon's highest court. You will be required to make judicial rulings on complex cases previously adjudicated by a lower court.

Knowledge of the U.S. Constitution and O.R.S. are required. Must possess (or be eligible to reinstate) active bar membership previous to swearing in. Kinda, sorta, maybe should live in Oregon or be willing to lie on application.

Consideration will be given to candidates with previous work experience on the bench. Solid Democratic Party credentials may be substituted for work experience.

Excellent job security and retirement benefits. Mediocre pay, unless you're barely making ends meet at present. Women and minorities are strongly encouraged to apply.

Call Teddy K.

I am not comfortable with the gender politics, including that of Jack Roberts. It sounds too much like the notion that gender loyalty trumps all other matters in any ultimate ruling.

I'd hate to hear, in the future, that a chief that holds process up to a microscope is replaced by one that holds immutable physical characteristics up to a microscope, as if that explains all (or absolutely nothing at all). The drift toward tribalism, even incrementally, is itself a sort of systemic disease.

Is the judicial system all about result or about process? About a fair process down to every single last individual?

Nevertheless, it is nice to see experience with labor law, which should serve to enhance the chance of splitting public employee labor bargaining units up by reason of the differential pension tier status (unless?).

Cool, -- "'the little guy'" -- finally someone not promoted from the AG's office.

Wouldn't it stand to reason that most candidates for the bench reside somewhere in I-5 Willamette Valley corridor? Why is this an issue?

Gender aside, Martha Walters is an excellent lawyer and will make a fine addition to the Oregon Supreme Court. As a former labor commissioner living in Eugene, I often received requests for a good local employment attorney. I always recommended Martha.

I don't think people should assume this will make much difference in my race against Virginia Linder. I've always believed voters are more interested in what's between our ears than what's between our legs.

Martha Walters is a great attorney with a stellar reputation. She absolutely has earned this appointment and will be an asset to the court.

I think it's very important that organized labor be "at the table".

Gov. Nesbitt made a great choice.

A pro-labor bias in a Supreme Court Justice is just as offensive as a pro-business bias. They ought to be pro-justice, and approach each case on it's merits.

PERS recipients seem to have received more than their fare share of "seats at the table."

PERS recipients seem to have received more than their fare share of "seats at the table."

Oh, come on!!

The PERS getters deserve everything that they can get.

As the song goes:
How do you like it?
How do you like it?
More, More MORE!!!


yep, never enough....

I found it very interesting that our new Justice announced her bias in the Oregonian today.

The caption for the picture of her said something like she "wants to look out for the little guy." (I don't have it in front of me.)

Silly me, I always thought judges were supposed to impartially rule on the law and the merits of the case, not have some a priori leaning as to who she would favor in her opinions.

Not in Oregon, though. No, here in Oregon our Supreme Court Justices unabashedly announce their biases in the daily newspaper.


If you don't think courts and "the process" are already biased *against* the little guy, then you haven't been paying attention. If she's going to look out for the little guy, the best she's going to do is tip the balance back where it belongs (neutral).

Mister Tee writes:
"PERS recipients seem to have received more than their fare share of "seats at the table.""

Umm. For all the seats I supposedly have at the table, the hosts have been downright inhospitable these past several years. They expect me to upchuck some of what I've already eaten. Doesn't sound to me like I have *enough* seats at the table even with Martha on the Court.


that's only because you confuse what's good for you with what's legal

At least according to my search of the bar directory at the time, not a one of the appointment candidates for the vacancy (and if I understand the process correctly, a person who's qualified can nominate him/herself) was from outside the Willamette Valley. There were, what, 8 people who submitted to the process? Sure, some lawyers from outside the valley might've figured it would be an exercise in futility, but that doesn't stop a lot of people from throwing their names in the hat. I wouldn't infer from that that there's no interest outside the valley (that'd just be silly), but, at least, this isn't one of those instances where the valley crowded out the rest of the state. You can't win if you don't play.

I suspect that after November, the rest of the state will be playing, regardless of whether they have qualified players. The elect-appeals-judges-by-district measure, which is truly pernicious, almost passed last time. As I recall, even Opie's hero, Dan Meek, actively campaigned for it. Dale Penn and Ron Saxton, too.

I think Meek may be trying to break the groupthink "please the right lawfirms and poltical parties" mentality that has led to some rather pernicious opinions. The judge-by-district measure may not be the answer. But pretending there is no problem isn't either.

I believe mrfearless's observation of the tide is partially correct. Justice Walters, I believe, is not personally tied to PERS in any way, nor would it matter.

Mr. Robert's, though, could elaborate on whether his vision, between his ears, of individual liberty extends so far as to allow him to relinquish any "contractual" claim (implying an individual right to voluntarily strike a bargain) to a higher pension tier status as part of pay for future work (or even past pay for past work, having been locked-in via precedent) than that accorded to Justice Walters. I'll take a trial court's word for it that such a matter is a public policy matter that I cannot seek relief for in court on the legality of a bond issuance -- confining me to a mere generalized whine as here.

I have previously made clear to mrfearless in his yahoo group that the best course of action in his own best interest is to assert a claim to pension obligation bond proceeds as a one time and one time only full and final release of all contractual obligations for all work predating the date upon which the underfunded liability calculations were based on. (But coupled with getting it out of the hands of PERB and OIC entirely.)

As the PERB/OIC folks venture into the realm of hedge funds that are nothing more than deceit about the highly speculative and leveraged game of elevated risk . . . just who is it that bears the risk of loss. (NYT: A Hedge Fund's Loss Rattles Nerves, Amaranth; and LTCM. Not in any way like hedging a cash position on a barge-load of wheat against an independent speculator, but here by taking two simultaneously speculative positions based on fishy statistical correlations, by hedging against only oneself in a clearly non-arm's-length-transaction.) I say it is you Mr. Roberts and mrfearless who bear that risk for you have the power to demand finality and you have elected to place your bets instead on the political process to transfer that prospective investment risk to the public.

What could be the harm of Mr. Roberts removing one source of an "appearance of impropriety" on PERS by today, even as a purely political ploy, foreswearing any personal claim to tier-one status, in favor of the latest and greatest tier? Integrity is a quirky thing. It is sometimes best set merely by example rather than command. This ain't about pro-public-union but about pro-investment-banker, quite deleterious to the working stiff in Oregon, East and West alike. Can you lead both mrfearless and his nemesis at the same time; using your noggin?

I can find absolutely no legal obstacle to you giving up a personally advantageous pecuniary status, but I could list oodles of purely political ones; ones that have no business whatsoever gaining an advantage via the judiciary. It is fully and completely within the realm of appropriate discussion in a judicial campaign, in my humble opinion. An independent judge needs courage . . . the kind that comes from an intellectual grasp of issues; and particularly a grasp of the perpetually undefinable term ethics.

(If you are not tier one then never mind. Any Justice's election would suffice for the above point.)

Mr. Ledbury, as one who has been out of government service for last 3 1/2 years, I have already forfeited any right to participate as anything other than a Tier 3 PERS employee should I re-enter public employment.

Not to mention the fact that the judicial retirement system is separate from the regular PERS.

As for your obsession with this subject, may I offer a friendly suggestion: Get a life!

Judge Walters made a comment to the "O" about understanding the little guy because that is the type of client she has represented for almost 30 years. This does not automatically translate into a "bias" on her part. A large percentage of those appointed to the bench come from large firms, went to places like Stanford or Harvard and represented wealthy individuals and corporations. Obviously they are smart people, and you have to give them a lot credit for giving up large incomes as partners to work for a fraction of their true earning potential in the name of public service. Understanding that a person who has limited financial resources often gets limited justice is important for a judge at any level in the process. It makes me feel better that a person with Judge Walters' background is on the bench. Something tells me that with the type of success she has had as a lawyer in private practice the lower salary won't be a big issue.

Martha Walters represented me over twenty years ago. She didn't care if I could pay. She worked diligently for about two years and won against an employer who had many more resources than I could muster. She was interested in fairness and making sure that the process worked the same for everybody - her adversaries included. I have not hesitated to recommend her to others over the years. I have the utmost respect for her and know that she is fair and will give the People of Oregon someone whom they can admire and trust. She has the qualities, aptitude, and deportment that all would expect of a Supreme Court Justice. I am proud to know her.

I would demand of a judge no less fidelity to the ABA rules than that which a judge would hold over any individual member of the bar or public.

A quick hunt on client trust accounts yields this:

"ABA Standard 4.11 provides that '[d]isbarment is generally appropriate when a lawyer knowingly converts client property and causes injury or potential injury to a client.' Even a single act of intentional and dishonest appropriation of a client's trust funds in violation of DR 1-102(A)(3) warrants disbarment."

Your client is the public and the public trust, your client trust account, includes nearly all accounts managed by government or under the color of government authority. Imagine if I made the argument, as some have dared, that I only temporarily borrowed my client's funds and that I made money and then returned it with interest -- thus there was no harm. (Or many variants of the same.)

I won't buy the argument that the legislature says it is OK, BECAUSE I am a judge, to escape the rigor of the rules of ethics that are applicable to all others that are in a position of trust.

I am also not prepared to conclude that any elective office is inherently filled by people who are obsessive, or self-serving; though it is a plausible assumption.

I had argued to the PPS Auditor, the one now working for Gresham, and to the PERB about the need for something equivalent to the bar's Professional Liability Fund or Client Security Fund, in regard of the pension obligation bond proceeds that are held in the name of the local government and yet exposed to risk of investment loss to the public. That is, they need a guarantor of the assumed returns, other than the prospect of cover by the client, that initially served as the economic justification for the issuance of the bonds.

The bond issuance (full faith and credit) should have extinguished the prior claims upon which they were based, in a resolution that achieved judicial finality, rather than merely extend and compound public liability. It is a fix that was not a fix at all. The commingling continues unabated, and you are in the class of private beneficiaries.

It should come as no surprise that I get some of my most wild ideas directly from reading nearly every disciplinary and admission case.

What might make someone proud to be a member of the bar rather than embarrassed, assuming membership was voluntary?

Transfer of investment risk is a "potential injury," wholly independent of legislative license to professionals to sell the idea of public gain via wishful thinking.

(It is nothing personal. It is just that the electoral process affords the only opportunity to raise such issues. I want it to be a meaningful opportunity, rather than one where professionalism is itself cover. Your willingness to engage is appreciated. The argument above would apply to all judicial candidates, even if there were no public pension for the judiciary.)

Virginia Linder seems game for engaging in the electoral process and could just as easily chime in here on the matter of fidelity. She too could assert that gender should be irrelevant, rather than a sales gimmick. Here is a popular "woman" too, as if it matters in a debate on public confidence in the judiciary. I wouldn't necessarily consider a popularity poll from Moshers in a Mosh Pit among professionals (the bar's poll) much of a clue either to likely representation of the public interest to tame lawyers (and my particular interest, attorneys for public bodies).

This IS My Simple Life -- and it is targeted at enhancing the credibility and integrity of the judiciary, as ironic as that may sound.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics