Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 7, 2006 4:39 PM. The previous post in this blog was Simple solution for the OHSU liability cap. The next post in this blog is World Cup pool final scores. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, July 7, 2006

What's so special?

Here's a weird one -- the Portland Development Commission has suddenly called a special board meeting for Monday. To do what? Elect its officers for the coming year!

Is that something so unforeseen that it couldn't be done at a regularly scheduled meeting? And what's the rush? Couldn't it wait until the next board meeting -- on Wednesday (scroll down)?

Is it just me, or is something odd going on?

Comments (1)

Due to my affiliation with the PDC I'm going to chose my words very carefully. The public, as well as City Council should be very concerned with the current state of affairs at the PDC.

The amount of recent uncoverings of questionable business practices as well as a continuing and weekly resignation of staff (some of whome are not even bothering with a two weeks notice at this point) highlights that the agency is in an absolute and utter crisis.

Shame on the PDC for issuing a press release one business day before a meeting. This demonstrates that the PDC is not serious about public outreach and involvement and is a very old trick to limiting public input. Schedule an important meeting and do not give the public enough time to find out about the meeting or make arrangements to attend. Very bad government practice. Classically bad government textbook actually.

I am very disappointed with PDC's public outreach direction. What started out as a serious attempt to change business culture for the better has turned into a focus for PDC to carefully cover up problems and suck up to city council.

Commissioner Leonard, I applaud you and other council members for questioning the current practices of the PDC. Please continue to do so. PDC is a corrupt and incompetant agency that needs to be watched very, very closely. If the mayor is not willing or able to do this, then Council by all means should.

I ask those in the public to get the word out about this meeting and attend. If you can not do this then I ask you to air your concerns to the mayor, to PDC, and to City Council about the way the meeting has been conveyed to the public. It is simply unacceptable.

Posted by: Very Concerned at July 7, 2006 06:19 PM

Very Concerned is very correct. This is also a popular way for staff to wear down appointed commissioners. Have lots of sudden meetings, provide little advance notice or information, 'forget' to prepare a board packet for the most obstreperous board member, don't have enough copies of important handouts for the board or the public, act put out or martyred when a board member makes a reasonable request for information...

The tricks are endless, but well-known to all staff people in any government agency: legislature, legislative committee, school board, city council, county commission, etc., etc., etc.

I say let's go back to the old corrupt patronage system. When the new reformers come in on election day, they get to throw out the entire civil service, if they want to, and start over. Everybody is (correctly) concerned about elected officials, but it's the staff that really holds the reins.

Good luck, PDCommissioners!

Posted by: mac at July 7, 2006 07:00 PM

The resolution on the prevailing wage indemnity for the Lents project -- which wasn't on the agenda for the last meeting, but it passed anyway -- is disconcerting.

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 7, 2006 10:35 PM

Also, because of my affiliation with PDC, I will be careful and honest with the words I choose. PDC has a problem with providing required public notice of its various meetings as recently demonstrated by PDC.

In the process of tram negotiations and the Amendment 8 to the North Macadam URD, PDC did not provide adequate public notice to those meetings. In fact, for an Amendment 8 meeting with the NM URAC notice was given only one day before the meeting and not even given to several organizations (example-League of Women Voters) that have requested notification.

Recently, PDC staff has developed procedural papers on better communication after complaints about such improper notification. Apparently PDC is not adhering to these recent papers.

In regard to PDC staff turnover, in the last two year period of the NM URAC there has been a total staff turnover that has been assigned to the North Macadam URD. You now have staff that when reviewing the budget, has no knowledge of what was written or discussed concerning the past NM budget which is now sorely lacking in funding.

There has also been improper minutes taken of URAC meetings. Important comments made by members have not been recorded; or if noted, commentator has not been recorded. There has been considerable "editorizing" of the meeting, and in many cases the viewpoint of PDC on an issue prevails and contrary comments, opinions, suggestions, etc. are left out.

There is also the problem in the format of Urban Renewal Advisory Committees. Yes, you must include a significant number of "stakeholders" in the URA, but since taxpayers are paying a very large portion of UR expenses, there needs to be more and better representation of the general public both on the PDC Commission and in the eleven URACs. In the NM URAC there are only really two "at-large" positions on a thirteen member committee; and only one of the two positions are filled. Currently, PDC is trying to address this concern, but there still needs to be even better taxpayer representation.

I also hope the essentially new PDC Commission addresses these issues, soon. There is turmoil at the PDC.

Posted by: Jerry at July 7, 2006 10:47 PM

You guys have to read this:
http://www.pdc.us/pdf/about/commission_meeting/2006/0712/(5)%20Eastside%20Streetcar%20(Report%20Attachment%20A).pdf

Cut and paste it into your browser. The "Attachment A" link to the board meeting is conveniently mislinked on the PDC website, but if you click "Attachment B" and replace the B with an A you get the above-linked report. This is the Eastside Transit Alternatives Analysis
Locally Preferred Alternative
Recommendation (say that 5 times fast)
that says the Streetcar is not only the most favored by the public but, get this, is the:

"Most cost-effective project by all three measures evaluated – annualized capital and operating cost and capital cost per new streetcar rider, federal capital cost per new streetcar rider and operating cost per new streetcar rider."

This is versus adding sufficient bus lines (dubbed the "no-build" alternative). You're telling me, PDC, that a $35MM (starting bid) streetcar is cheaper than buses? Crack you are smoking, yes.

And, the Streetcar essentially polled well with the public versus buses. (Which would you rather ride? A bus, or the (Da-da-da-DUM) Streetcar?)

And, the streetcar saw 30% higher ridership than the bus (because you actually have to pay the driver before getting on, you idiots!).

So, self-fulfilling prophecy self-fulfilled. Let people ride a shiny new toy train for FREE, then ask them what they'd like on the east side. ARHGURHGAURTHGHHHH! My head hurts.

Posted by: Don Smith at July 7, 2006 11:03 PM

Sorry to go on, but I'm seeing something else. How much will the streetcar cost?

From this coming Wednesday's report from Bruce warner to the Commissioners -

"A major portion of the project is the funding strategy. Portland Streetcar, Inc. (PSI) has identified and is anticipating funding from three urban renewal areas – Oregon Convention Center, River District and Central Eastside, in a total amount of between $20 million and $35 million, depending on the alternative chosen (see Attachment C)."

How much will the streetcar cost? The papers will likely report $20-35MM, right? That's the number given here. BUT! Check the Attachments. A, linked in my previous post, notes:

"The OMSI MOS would have a capital funding
gap between project costs and anticipated revenues of $37 million." That's just the GAP in funding.

Also:

"The Oregon Street MOS is recommended as the first construction segment for the project for the following reasons:
- The Oregon Street MOS would require $60 million in FTA Small Starts funding, less than the statutory maximum of $75 million for a single project. All other MOS options and the Full Loop Alternative would require the maximum level of
FTA participation."

There are THREE MOSes, Oregon Street, Grand, and Omsi. The cheapest is $60MM and therefore must be the first so that once we get started we can't stop (it would cost too much to pull the plug). The other two, or doing it all at once would each be more than $75 per segment, and presumably at least $210MM total.

So our choo-choo now costs.... at least $210MM. And that's the initial estimate. Quadruple that if their as good as OHSU at guessing.

All so people can ride toy trains free. And we haven't even TALKED about the line from OMSI over the Willamette.

No, Sellwood bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down, Sellwood Bridge is falling down, let's build one foooor a Choo-choo.

Posted by: Don Smith at July 7, 2006 11:17 PM

I'm going to this meeting Wednesday. The public comment is at 3:15. I'll see you all there. Commissioner Sam will be in at 4:30 for the Streetcar briefing.

I'm pissed.

Posted by: Don Smith at July 7, 2006 11:19 PM




Is it time for a ballot measure curtailing the city's (and PDC's) ability to issue bonds?

Thanks
JK

Posted by: jim karlock at July 8, 2006 01:01 AM

The Oregonian, Thursday, July 06, 2006, "Potter bristles at push to audit agency" (Starting about mid article):

In his most recent battle, Leonard says the Portland Development Commission may have subverted city
policies on affordable housing and living wages for construction workers on a condo tower at 209 S.W. Oak
St.

The commission had the property appraised at $850,000, then paid $1.2 million for it. A second appraisal
by the same company showed the property's value at negative $2.7 million, Leonard says. The commission's requirements for affordable units, parking spots and trash services for the next-door building dropped the property's value below zero, the commission said.

Based on the final appraisal, the commission agreed to donate the land to developer Trammell Crow
Residential for a 26-story, 160-unit condo tower.

(http://www.oregonlive.com/search/index.ssf?/base/news/115215272019080.xml?oregonian?lcg&coll=7)

JK: PDC pays 1.2 mil then gives it FREE to a well connected developer -- the PDC doesn't need auditing. It needs a summery execution. Clean out the desks, fire everybody. Our schools need the money worse than Homer et.al.

Thanks
JK

Posted by: jim karlock at July 8, 2006 03:53 AM




The public comment is at 3:15.

Doncha just love it when governmental bodies schedule meetings and public comment periods when the vast majority of average citizens are at work? That virtually guarantees the only people there will be the lawyers, lobbyists and policy wonks who are paid to be there.

They're hiding in plain sight.

Posted by: Hinckley at July 8, 2006 07:45 AM




Go by BOONDOGGLE!


Posted by: Mister T at July 8, 2006 09:48 AM




"Potter bristles at push to audit agency"

Guess what - PDC has the same leverage over Potter that the unions do now. This guy is severely compromised, probably by his past behaviors.

Posted by: Steve at July 8, 2006 09:58 AM

Jerry,

My experience is that the kinds of due process machinations you detail go on with public (quasi or not) bodies all over the region. Imho, its good ole action and it it the way this place has been run forever. What is really enough to gag the proverbial maggot is when someone, say from the City Club or the press dons a moralistic tone , saying that people are seeing problems because the issues are too complicated for them to understand or hinting that they are "not all there".

These are the kinds of tactics the German Nazis learned from the American Mob. Wake up Oregon!


Posted by: Cynthia at July 8, 2006 11:18 AM




Returning to Jack's original question, I agree that the Special Meeting to elect officers is very odd. According to the PDC bylaws (www.pdc.us/pdf/about/pdc-bylaws.pdf), officers are to be elected in January. If a vacancy occurs, the election is to be at the next regularly scheduled meeting (my emphasis). Since the bylaws are more restrictive than the ORS cited in the Special Meeting notice, it seems to me the bylaws should trump and the election should take place as previously announced at the regular meeting on Wednesday.

One explanation could be that PDC needs a duly elected chairman to sign something on Tuesday.

As an aside, it seems past time to revise the PDC bylaws, something that could presumably be done without a Charter amendment. For example, the bylaws currently state that official notice is not required for PDC meetings.

Posted by: Amanda Fritz at July 8, 2006 12:56 PM

I just want to bring it to the attention of everyone out there that there will also be another VERY IMPORTANT meeting of the Portland Saturday Market permanent home study at PDC on the 14th at PDC. Will this meeting seal our fate?
How will this shake up effect us? We are all WONDERING......

Posted by: Portland Saturday Market Vendor at July 8, 2006 07:51 PM

I'm not sure a "shake up" is in order, but something funny seems to be happening.

Last year the election of officers was originally scheduled for a regular meeting on July 13, 2005, but "deferred" until a regular meeting on August 10 because new board members and a new executive director were coming on board.

This year, there are two new board members coming on soon, and yet they're accelerating the process for some reason. The Monday agenda calls for executive director Bruce Warner to make a report, and then for the board to elect "Board Chair, Board Secretary and Board Acting Secretary." The current board secretary is Doug Blomgren, a carryover from the Katz days, but for some reason there is also an "acting secretary" in the form of Potter lieutenant Mark Rosenbaum. Blomgren and current chair Eric Parsons are on their way out, but it's not clear to me when they formally exit (if they have not already done so).

Again, why this can't wait 'til Wednesday is quite a mystery. What's happening Monday or Tuesday that causes such a rush?

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 8, 2006 08:10 PM


Just an odd thought which I will leave up to you legal minds to say if it has any relevance.

The recent liablity ruling, said the instituion was protected, ie PDC but the individuals could be sued, in the case of OHSU the Drs and Nurses, does that mean that PDC Board Members can now be sued as individuals with out the $200,000 cap.

Posted by: John Capardoe at July 8, 2006 10:51 PM

JK,

We need to ban the use of the phrase affordable housing and replace it with the correct phrase of landlord subsidy.

Not all bond issuances are the same. Some -- most -- of them are in the category of moral obligation bonds where we can simply choose to point the bondholders right back, exclusively, at the special beneficiaries. The bond buyers are not innocent. Nor do the special beneficiaries of special tax breaks have a contractual right to compel the continuation of any such goodies against the wishes of a future council. As proof, if a recipient of landlord subsidies bugs out via bankruptcy or who-knows-what the bondholder would themselves have to insist that a subsequent owner of affected property also continues to retain special tax treatment so as to continue to prop up the value of the collateral (as the real-thing interest, as a twist on the Real Party in Interest) prospectively.


The 4:30 to 5 PM meeting is followed by a 6 to 8 PM meeting styled as "Central Gateway Redevelopment Strategy Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting." Then there are 2 Tuesday meetings: "Burnside Bridgehead Citizen Advisory Committee" and "Lents Town Center Urban Renewal Advisory Committee" Calendar.

Someone from the PDC is sure to attend each of these little meetings to either present plans or answer questions. The newly elected PDC members can just have an official sounding title when (if) they are quietly introduced.

Posted by: Ron Ledbury at July 9, 2006 05:33 AM

"""The Monday agenda calls for executive director Bruce Warner to make a report"""

That will be a special read.

No doubt it will be, in part, another PDC cover up and obscuring of their activities and accounts with suggestions that their has been public participation and review through the URACs etc.

The PDC continues to hide it's accounts and ledgers from public view. From officials, from citizen advisory groups, from journalists and from citizens who inquire.
They won't even reveal what debt service is costing let alone the many projects besides the Tram which have grown in cost. Basic and complete budgets are being withheld.
Leonard needs to broaden his audit demand to cover all of the books at the PDC.

Both sets.

When he discovers he has been lied to far worse than he was on $15.5 Tram and SoWa being a toxic wasteland incappable of development without massive UR subsidies, he may rise to the level of outrage needed to purge the agency of it's rampant dishonesty and mismanagement.

Posted by: Steve Schopp at July 9, 2006 07:27 AM

What I find shocking is PDC's silence regarding their critics. I mean, how many hits does this website get alone? You would think that PDC would be saavy enough to realize a response or two to at least inform everyone on what is going on and would do wonders fo public relations and go a long way in helping the agency appear more transparent. Justified, Arrogant, clueless or cowards? PDC, you tell us, but your silence tells it is one or all of the latter three.

By not responding to the public's questions, including blogs like this one, PDC is furthering the public's distrust and support.

In the current city climate, the PDC needs all the help they can get. They have few fans within the City, they have few fans in the non-profit or advocacy communities, few fans from the neighborhood association level, few willing to stand up for them in the business community, so why is the PDC making it even worse?

I wouldn't be surprised if Monday's Commission meeting has to do with a Commissoner or two deciding to step down as they have realised they do not want their names or future professional reputations associated with such a screwed up agency. (no doubt it will be the old "to spend more time with family") excuse.

A little advice to Bruce Warner (and I know you read this blog becuase otherwise why would you issue an agency mandate that will not tolerate staff posting comments here?):

I hate to be the one to tell you this but until you get rid of most of your management team and some key managers including both people you inherited and people you brought in (without an open hiring process I might add), things are only going to continue to spiral. How obvious does it need to be?

The PDC's HR including huge staff turnover is in crises

The PDC's public relations and public outreach and involvement is in crises

The PDC's financial reporting is in crises

PDC's Commission might very well be in crises (although we don't know that because your public relations decion makers appear clueless in how to manage public information and involvement)

How many lawsuits, how many resignations, how many negative news articles, how many "special sessions" is it going to take to get you to take PDC by the balls and make some real changes?

Or is this how you think a public agency should be run?

We are patiently waiting for a response.

Posted by: Very Concerned at July 9, 2006 12:25 PM

I hear the meeting was finally the time that PDC came clean on the fact that they have been bludgeoning baby harbor seals, and single handedly been responsible for the reduction of the polar bear population -- as well as announcing which employees are going to be nominated for best actor/actress in a dramatic short.

Posted by: Juan Valdez at July 11, 2006 06:15 AM

Operating in the dark is the PDC's forte. And their public notices? Buried in the classifieds, written in 2 pt type. Standard operating procedure.

The city needs to completely do away with the PDC. It's just about the only way to even possibly safe the City from bankruptcy. Go, Randy Leonard!

Posted by: Lily at July 11, 2006 11:55 PM

And, personally, I thnk Bruce Warner should be run out of town on a rail. Maybe tarred and feathered first.

Posted by: Lily at July 11, 2006 11:57 PM

[Posted as indicated; restored later.]


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009

The Occasional Book

Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 280
At this date last year: 129
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics