Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 7, 2006 3:04 PM. The previous post in this blog was It's true we make a better day, just you and me. The next post in this blog is What's so special?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, July 7, 2006

Simple solution for the OHSU liability cap

Commenters here have raised some interesting arguments for retaining some sort of special liability cap for OHSU. You can read them yourself in the comments to this entry. I'm not sure I'm buying them -- not as I stare at that infernal tram tower -- but let's assume that you do. Well then, we could solve this mess by retaining the cap -- just making it much larger, and adjusting it every year by some inflation factor.

The state agency liability cap (ORS 30.270) came in in 1967. Was the $200,000 limit put in place then? If so, let's just change it to reflect inflation over the intervening 38 years. What cost $200,000 in 1967 would cost $1,138,686.94 in 2005, according to the national Consumer Price Index.

Of course, the cost of medical care has gone up much faster than the cost of living generally. And the cost of living in Portland -- particularly housing -- has escalated much faster than it has elsewhere in the country. So let's be generous and set the new limit at $2 million, or even $2.5 million, and adjust it automatically every year for inflation. You could pick whatever inflation index you like.

If the recent court ruling is right, this is going to take an amendment to the state constitution. But if OHSU deserves a liability cap, it should not be at a number that was set decades ago. Certainly they're not talking about rolling back their prices up there to 1967 levels.

Comments (1)

As for the idea that the higher cap (or no cap) would deter experimental or daring procedures, we could institute a cap only for the type of work we want to encourage -- sort of like "orphan drug" laws.

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 7, 2006 03:24 PM

Here's an even simpler solution: eliminate sovereign immunity altogether. It's the basis of OHSU's tort cap.

The concept of sovereign immunity is based entirely upon the government America overthrew--a monarchy. Sovereign immunity is a holdover from English common law saying the king can do no harm. There are few concepts more antithetical to an alleged democratic government.

Still, it persists. Not hard to imagine why. In fact, the US Supers have been strengthening sovereign immunity recently. There are reasonable arguments sovereign immunity is simply unconstitutional but one doesn't need to be steeped in 1789 and tri-corner hats to know wrong from right. Is it right the government gets a free pass where Joe Lunchbucket would be liable?

I believe it was either Caligula or Mel Brooks who said, "It's good to be the king."

Posted by: Anahit at July 7, 2006 04:46 PM

The $200,000 cap was put in in the late 1970s following a horrible McMinnville School District bus/train collision in Lafayette, Oregon. Several children died - most were Hispanic, if my memory serves me correctly. The Legislature quickly put in a cap or strengthened or revised it to make sure the parents of those pesky little kids didn't get much money.
However, like many posters here, I thought OHSU was a *private* organization, not a government institution. I wish that question had been settled with this lawsuit, but apparently it hasn't?

Posted by: mac at July 7, 2006 06:53 PM

The cap is nothing but a sham to increase OHSU's profitability. They are shielded from liability over $200K while private hospitals are not. Yet is there any evidence that healthcare costs less at OHSU than at a private hospital?

Posted by: Trace at July 7, 2006 07:14 PM

actually, the only really decisive part of the ruling. as I understand it, was that it firmly and without equivocation defined OHSU as a public entity.

Posted by: Cat at July 7, 2006 09:25 PM

Oh, it's ALWAYS been a public entity, it just wants to act like a private one while holding on to the benefits (taxes and tort caps) of being a public entity. The reason: It wants to compete against the privates while using the benefits of being a public agency for competitive advantage. Of course, the other hospitals could just expand the definition of untreatable indigent care and send even more of their indigent patients to OHSU.

Note also that the level of indigent care provided at OHSU (over 50% of patients are considered indigent care) augurs for OHSU's support of a liberal Oregon Health Plan and also means that its "competitors" keep their mouths shut about OHSU minor abuses, so they can continue to divert large amounts of their indigent care to OHSU.

I personally don't know why anyone who had decent health care insurance would EVER want to go to OHSU for their care....unless, of course, their affliction is so unusual that nobody else treats it locally.

I've seriously considered a Medic Alert braclet that clearly states, "No, no, NOT the Hill!"

Posted by: godfry at July 8, 2006 09:36 AM

For anyone interested in the facts, OHSU is a public corporation. You can find the enabling legislation in ORS 353 and read for yourself the laws under which the organization operates.

In recent years, state support for both the hospital and university has been greatly reduced, from 30% of budget some years ago to 4% today. If the hospital doesn't make a profit, it can't afford to make the capital investment that keeps its facilities up to date, and thus would lose the ability to attract both paying patients and top physicians. Lose the paying patients, and you end up with a "charity hospital" that would require massive state aid just to stay open.

So you can raise the liability cap or eliminate it, but that will inevitably have other financial effects -- as in more state aid, or less care for the uninsured. Pick your option.

Posted by: Jim Holman at July 8, 2006 05:14 PM

This is my understanding of the status of quasi-immunity as of now. The Tort Claims cap applies to the quasi-governmental entity but not it's employees. Plaintiff may sue the individuals responsible for negligence and recover damages limited to the financial condition of the individuals (liability limits of insurance). While the entity liability is capped at 200k.
Here's the interesting part. The entity by statute must pay the employee defense costs and indemnify damage awards against it's employees for any vicarious liability as determined by the jury.

Me thinks the Supremes will clarify the murk. Stay tuned.

Aint the law grand!


Posted by: geno at July 8, 2006 05:31 PM




Jim -- You are mistaken about OHSU's level of uncompensated care. See the WW's article from December 2005 on the subject. In 1995 OHSU provided 39% more charity care than the average Oregon hospital, but that has been declining for 10 years and in 2004 they provided 12% LESS than the average hospital. So other hospitals in the state provide more uncompensated care AND they are liable for appropriate damages in malpractice cases.

Also, let's be honest about the costs we're talking about. OHSU's own analysis showed a worst-case scenario of $43 million a year (which is absurdly high unless their doctors are really, really bad). That's about the same as they are spending on the tram, and even though that's a one-time cost, if you factor in the debt service on the hundreds of millions in construction they have done or plan to do, you're probably not far from that worst-case figure. Paying for malpractice will certainly cause them to cut back in some areas -- although uncompensated care isn't one of them because they've been slashing that for a decade -- but it's the morally right thing to do and a little more focus on medicine and less on expansion might do them some good.

Posted by: Miles at July 8, 2006 05:44 PM




From the little I've read, the cause of Jordaan's horrible catastrophy was that an alarm wasn't plugged in, so that when his airway dislodged, no one knew in time. Typically, this would be in the perview of a particular nurse, respiratory therapist or even doctor, wouldn't it?

I'm sure everyone involved was mortified with guilt and despair. Does anyone dispute that? I suppose I can understand the human need of all the onlookers to execute (punish) the person who made the mistake, but I suspect he or she was already suicidal over what happened.

If there is a matter for justice, isn't it about that one person who made the error? Evidently, even the most cruel and vicious onlookers have some compassion for the person at fault, the person who did the malpractice. I've seen nothing about individual punishment for an individual negligent act in this blog.

I understand why every person and entity up the chain is sued. They are remote and practically anonymous. But you know as well as I that it is about the pursuit of deeper pockets than those of a nurse or respiratory therapist, or even a single doctor.

I understand why the law firms involve themselves. Otherwise, the mother and son have no other way to ever hope for financial survival. Of course, altruism and heroics from the legal people would be a bit more convincing if Joordan's award weren't ultimately to be discounted by a 40%, or whatever, contingency fee.

I even understand why doctors and hospitals bill for bad outcomes: To to do otherwise is to admit responsibility and guilt. Of course, in this case that apparently was immediately stipulated. So in this case maybe no one has thought to break rank, see how unfair it is and make it right.

But, for Jordaan's tragedy to be displaced to the topics of monetary caps, malpractice insurance rates, legislative remedies, and constitutional amendments, that is a sham, that I don't understand.

The central problem here is not about liability caps and big malpractice awards. The problem is that all our friends and neighbors regularly accept catastrophic outcomes from life...from malpractice, accident, natural causes, aging and disease...and receive nothing from their fellow man but the indignity of Medicaid and occasional glances of sympathy.

Rather than indexing the liability cap, I suggest citizens find a way to self-insure the catastrophically unfortunate, starting by diverting the money now pouring into insurance premiums, legal fees and administrative costs.

Take all that money squandered on scavangers and opportunists and hand it directly to our growing class of castaways.

Posted by: WoodburnBob at July 8, 2006 06:54 PM




all our friends and neighbors regularly accept catastrophic outcomes from life...from malpractice, accident,

If the bad outcome is from malpractice -- negligence -- then your friends and neighbors are entitled to recover damages from the negligent person, and his or her employer. It's been that way in this country ever since it was founded. Even an "accident" (unintentional act) gives rise to damages if it is caused by someone's negligence or a defective consumer product.

The no-fault "system" you envision doesn't exist in most places -- although I think New Zealand has something along those lines. But everybody there pays for (and must live with the limitations of) that system. Here, everyone else pays, but OHSU gets a largely free ride, and its victims suffer more than victims of other wrongful acts. That's not right.

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 8, 2006 07:56 PM

I believe forcing OHSU to address this aspect of their care, would be doing them a favor, in a free market way. Why? Because it will make their product more attractive to those who do have insurance. Right now anyone who has surgery there is risking everything, because there is virtually no financial recourse should OHSU do something wrong. If your lifestyle changes dramatically because of their mistake, you must come up with a way to pay for it. That should drive a lot of business elsewhere. I believe they've gotten away with it because the community was not as aware of the cap as they are now. One of the side effects of the tram debate is that it drew OHSU into the spotlight, and when the story of the kid broke, the full downside of the current arrangement came into view. I also believe fixing this will help with the human element. If I were in the medical field, I'd feel more at ease knowing that my patient wasn't facing financial ruin if I made a mistake. The patient's safety net would also take some pressure off of me, and if something did go wrong, it would lessen my guilt. No one is trying to claim these people aren't doing heroic work. Let's not forget they were trying to help this kid. Can you imagine doing a heart operation on a baby? It's a lot tougher than anything most of us have to do. Now it's just up to the courts and the community to do a little corrective surgery on their financial set-up, for their own good.

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 8, 2006 10:02 PM

It's been that way in this country ever since it was founded.

Just my point. Time for change. Wouldn't just this argument for the status quo have been marshalled against the XIII and XIX amendments, "no-fault divorce, "no-fault insurance"? Should those movements have been properly terminated by the principle of tradition?

Don't get me wrong here. OHSU's transformation from medical school, indigent municipal hospital and regional referral center into a Machiavellian kingdom serving Mammon is a disgrace, if not a high crime.

Posted by: WoodburnBob at July 9, 2006 08:43 AM

[Posted as indicated; restored later.]


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009

The Occasional Book

Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 225
At this date last year: 71
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics