Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on July 20, 2006 1:03 AM. The previous post in this blog was Nervous public is reassured. The next post in this blog is Fit to print. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, July 20, 2006

Shame on America

Here -- watch any of them -- and weep with me.

Comments (1)

Er, when their server comes back up, that is...

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 20, 2006 02:44 AM

Yo, Blair!

Sheesh, what an idiot. Personally, I'm not bothered by his usage of "s__t," but that his comment reveal him to be an utter idiot, completely unaware of what's going on in the world, and living in a dream world.

Posted by: Dave J. at July 20, 2006 07:14 AM

Dave J., you're an idiot. What he said may have not been eloquent, but it was spot on.

Jack, I have no clue why you - or the press - care about this at all.

Posted by: tscrib at July 20, 2006 08:16 AM

Dave J., you're an idiot. What he said may have not been eloquent, but it was spot on.

First off, I believe insults directed at another poster are a violation of the commenting policy here.

That said, what did he say that was "spot on." That part about "we need to call Kofi and get him to do something." Oooh, yeah, that was brilliant. In every other speech he talks about how the UN is worthless, ineffective, etc., and then when something bad happens his great idea is the UN. Brilliant!

Perhaps there were other nuggets of genius sprinkled into his conversation, but it was kind of hard to hear over the talking-with-food-in-mouth and the heavy mouth-breathing. (Neither of which were surprising, by the way.) Hard to imagine anyone who could make Bush the Elder look like a beacon of grace and dignity, but whaddaya know.

Posted by: Dave J. at July 20, 2006 08:57 AM

Yes, I agree with your comment about the elder Bush even when he was throwing up on a Head of State he was far less embarassing then his idiot son.

Posted by: tom at July 20, 2006 09:08 AM

I felt for Bush 41 when he threw up, since it was clearly by accident and clearly embarrassed him. The stuff Bush 43 does--the uninvited neck rubs, the "Yo! Blair!" business, the "Let's get to that pig" stuff...this is stuff he's choosing to do, and which doesn't embarrass him in the least, in spite of the fact that he's making his whole country look bad.

The expletive didn't bother me in the least. Everything else does.

916 more days. I hope nothing (else) terrible happens in the meantime.

Posted by: teacherrefpoet at July 20, 2006 09:15 AM



Good sh*t!

Posted by: rickyragg at July 20, 2006 09:17 AM

Interesting. I hadn't seen any of the context for the quote -- just about 10 seconds or so of the part the media want to play up.

I always thought the coarse language was a complete non-issue. But now, after listening to the minute or so just before that, I have to say that I am embarrassed by the substance (such as it was) of the President's remarks.

What I found most painful to listen to was Blair's patient attempt to speak with Bush in a somewhat sophisticated manner while Bush was continuously interrupting him with inane commentary.

How terribly, terribly frustrating it must be for Tony Blair to have his fortunes tied so closely to such a buffoon.

Posted by: David Wright at July 20, 2006 09:24 AM

Eloquence aside, Bush is right. Getting Hezbollah, et al to knock it off would stop the problem. It's not like Israel didn't give the bad guys a chance to not attack them, yet again. Go Israel!

Posted by: andy in korea at July 20, 2006 10:33 AM

Paris Hilton recently said that she and Jessica Simpson act dumb in public but are actually smart behind the scenes. President Bush is a little like that: He acts dumb in public but when you see him behind the scenes he acts even dumber. One tip: Before you take a leadership role in the world, learn how to eat a roll with your mouth shut.

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 10:45 AM

"Bush is right...Go Israel!"
Right on, where the hell does Hezbollah get off dropping bombs on a soverign nation and killing civilians. Sheesh, this is the 21st century guys get with the program haven't you ever heard of a little something called diplomacy?

Posted by: tom at July 20, 2006 10:57 AM

I realize how low the bar has been set when Bush apologists don't realize how embarrassing and telling that trip was. You'd rather yuk it up, claiming a hidden genius in his levity. And yet, while the foreign press was questioning (repeatedly)what his response was to the grave, new fighting between Isreal and Lebannon, he was obsessed with friggin' roast pork.

Yes, indeed, we all missed the genius of his ways. All we needed was for Bush to step out of his sheltered existance/treatment he has here in the states, and whammo!, we have instant perspective on how universally wrong this country was to elect a ne'er-do-well fratboy as the 'Leader of the free world'. Because hey, we wouldn't sent civil engineers into nuclear engineering positions, but we damn-well need to be able to sip Bud Lite with a man who should have more responsibility than ANYONE. Indeed, Clinton's history as a Rhodes Schollar in Economics and work creating a budget surplus WAS FAR TOO ELITIST FOR JOE SIXPACK.

Are Republicans' egos so fragile they can't admit they were so deaf, dumb and blind to GOP hackery? Come on, isn't this the pinnacle of Conservatism, in it's most unadulterated state, controlling all branches of government? All the layers of onion, peeled away for everyone to see... and the hits just keep on comin'. I think Goldwater conservatives are counting Bush's days in office more studiously than Dems at this point, it's THAT bad.

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 11:24 AM

The merits of Israel's case against Hezbollah, just point out how wrong President Bush was to do a premptive strike on Iraq. What would Bush supporters say if the President had said, "Hezbollah is just doing a preemptive strike so it's all part of the Bush Doctrine."
Israel acted in self-defense here. There were no rockets coming down on us from Iraq.

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 11:28 AM

But.. "that deaf, dumb and blind kid sure plays a mean pinball"

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 11:40 AM

tk it must really irritate you that as bad as bush may be, your side couldnt field a candidate to beat him... says a lot doesnt it.. clowns to the left of me, clowns to the right and tk here i am stuck in the middle with you... (two more years) joco :)

Posted by: jocoze at July 20, 2006 12:22 PM

p.s i meant to say clowns to the left of me jokers to the right... ill play the role of joker. weeping? come on jack.. man up... :)

Posted by: jocoze at July 20, 2006 12:26 PM

George W. Bush is President because God wanted him to be. The Almighty is running a bit behind schedule on the Apocolypse and needed someone to speed things up.

Posted by: tom at July 20, 2006 02:00 PM


I lay part of the blame at the feet of Beltway Dems and TV pundits for making an issue of Howard Dean's scream, so they could put a Vet (Kerry was seen a safer choice in the hysteria following 9/11) on the ticket. Dean was the only clear choice for any rank-and-file Dem who though our country needed a housecleaning. And yet the media chose to focus on the inconsequential 'scream' rather than anything of substance. Fair and Balanced (my ass).

So yeah, a lot of Dems are pissed at the party and their hack consultants who play it safe. But still, John Kerry was still a much, much better choice than Bush. So who's fault is that? Our passive, ill-informed citizens, to start.

I urge everybody, conservative or liberal, to take a closer look at Russ Feingold for '08.

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 02:46 PM

Oh and Jocoze... aren't you man enough to weep when you see the country you love being led down the sh*tter?

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 02:59 PM

Yeah TK, everybody's ill-informed and ignorant, except you of course. Can you be any more arrogant?

With attitudes like yours, no wonder Liberals are losing ground in this state (and country).

Funny how you lay Iraq squarely at the feet of the GOP, when congress overwhelmingly supported going to war.

Or are you one of those "Bush Lied" nut-jobs?

Posted by: Chris McMullen at July 20, 2006 03:53 PM

"lay Iraq squarely at the feet of the GOP"? Didn't you get the memo? Iraq is going great.
I'm actually encouraged that Bush supporters are starting to talk about Iraq in realistic terms. Not wanting sole blame for this disaster is understandable. Of course, if it had turned out great, you'd have creditied it all to the GOP's decisive leadership and greatness in foreign policy, but I guess that possibility's not worth holding onto now. Maybe some kind of middle ground would work for the next spin. How about, "It would have gone great but that darn Cindy Sheehan screwed it up"?

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 04:17 PM

The 6+ year tantrum continues...

Ignore inconvenient facts, blame others, never entertain other points of view. Feeling right is all that matters. Surround yourself with like-minded drones and lash out!

Posted by: rickyragg at July 20, 2006 04:17 PM

I'm a lot more concerned with 20,000 plus young people missing limbs, etc... from fighting in a war that didn't have to happen, than how you're handling the harsh words.

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 04:22 PM


Any and every poll suggests a majority of Americans are ill-informed about our country's matters. When more people vote for f-ing American Idol than a presidency, I don't think I'm being arrogant at all. How else do you explain an asshat like Bush getting 'reelected'.

And are you serious about liberals losing ground? Your vaunted conservative movement is projected to take a nosedive this November, pal.

Yes, count me in that group that says 'Bush lied'. Try picking up a paper sometime... and for God's sake, turn off Fox News. What do you call using fake evidence to go into a pre-emptive strike/invasion?? A fib? A tall-tale? Wake up...

The illogical, grasping-at-straws defense can only signify Bush's ideals are 'in its last throes'...

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 04:23 PM

Weep with you?

Jack, there's no crying in blogging! I have to admit it, though, George W. is in some kind of league of his own.

Posted by: Robert Canfield at July 20, 2006 04:29 PM


Even if Iraq was a peaceful place today, the GOP would have a lot to answer for. Like, 'Who actually thought an American occupying force would bring stability to the middle east?" or "This preemptive strike and occupation... Do we have double standards for ourselves and the rest of the world?" I realize you're against Bush too, but people seem to forget that the ongoing violence in Iraq isn't the only reason the invasion was a huge mistake.

Thanks for the deflective rhetoric. Now, would you care to actually defend your Clown Prince? Nothing? I guess that would explain the deflective rhetoric.

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 04:36 PM

"George W. is in some kind of league of his own"
You mean Bush League (rimshot)

Posted by: tom at July 20, 2006 04:38 PM

This is depressing.

Bush at the G8. The Middle East. The people in here sniping at each other. Even the truck I saw today with its "Proud to be an American" bumper sticker. And it's really depressing that I think that that is depressing.

Hey, Mr. President, I could really use a backrub right about now!

Posted by: ellie at July 20, 2006 04:44 PM

TK, it's more fun watching you wet yourself than rebutting your nutty, misguided inanities.

And Bill, when did I ever say I was a Bush supporter? I merely stated Congress (many Dems included) overwhelmingly voted for the war.

"...If Saddam defies the world and we fail to respond, we will face a far greater threat in the future. Saddam will strike again at his neighbors; he will make war against his own people. And mark my words, he will develop weapons of mass destruction. He will deploy them, and he will use them.” – Bill Clinton, 1998.

Or did the Clinton administration manipulate intelligence, too?

Posted by: Chris McMullen at July 20, 2006 05:01 PM


I don't know that I'd describe my factual statements as 'wetting myself'. But I know the conservative response to terrorists has been what I'd describe as 'bedwetting'. You know, with knee-jerk 'solutions' that violate everyone's civil rights, ignore the constitution, and get us into an occupation that had NOTHING to do with 9-11. And we can thank you, honorary member of the 101st Fighting Keyboardists, for putting political party ahead of country.

So, you're saying you don't support Bush? You must be one of the growing number of Republicans who are conveniently backing away from Bush, hoping nobody notices your previous positions. Nice.

As for Clinton, I think he was smart enough to know not to conflate Al-Qaeda and Saddam/Iraq (hint: they HATED each other). Nor was he stupid enough to invade Iraq, expecting parades, flowers, and unicorns. Let's not forget that Clinton actually did something about both Al-Qaeda and Iraq.... they're called 'surgical strikes', so they don't make for entertaining political power-grabs like Bush's war does for mass media.

I seem to remember Republicans screaming "NO WAR FOR MONICA!" as Clinton was going after Osama in Afghanistan and Africa...

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 05:20 PM

Chris, Sorry if I misread where you are coming from. Bill

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 06:30 PM

"Or are you one of those 'Bush Lied' nut-jobs?" Chris Mullen

"The British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." GWB, State of the Union Address 2003.

"And I don't know if we're going to find out the senior administration official [who leaked Valerie Plame's identity]. Now, this is a large administration, and there's a lot of senior officials. I don't have any idea. I'd like to." GWB, 10/7/03.

Question: How can you deny the above are both deliberate lies?

Question: Why would a non-Bush supporter deny they are lies? Do you get paid to do so?

I ask because the inconsistency reminds me of Bill O'Reilly, who IS paid to deny being a Bush supporter yet deny Bush lies. It's a propoganda technique of coating blind loyalism to Bush with a thin coat of feebly asserted "independent" thinking. The speaker's self proclaimed independence fools the casual observer into accepting the absurd pro-Bush lies he spouts as trustworthy.

If you are not getting paid to employ this propoganda technique, why are you doing it? It's an honest question.

Posted by: Sam at July 20, 2006 06:53 PM

Of course most everyone would have liked President Bush to speak more eloquently. But, I would have to admit that most of my friends, associates, business contacts, even some government employees speak/ act in just this manner/ways (especially at home and play). Why just look at Bojacks Blog and Blogs in general and it is difficult to find "perfect" dialoge-right Jack? And this isn't a critical remark, for me atleast it is reality. Some of us can't even spell or punctuate, like me.

Posted by: Lee at July 20, 2006 07:18 PM

Do the men at your workplace walk up and start massaging the shoulders of the women? I'm sorry, but that was lame. Not being able to talk well is one thing, but that kind of behavior is now seen as just weird and creepy.

Posted by: Bill McDonald at July 20, 2006 07:22 PM

Gosh, I just reread all the above postings. I found more cuss words, etc. than I hear from my friends and at construction sites. I won't comment on some of the poor logic I read.

Posted by: Lee at July 20, 2006 07:24 PM


That's an honest question, but... When have we ever seen a glimpse of any thoughtful, intelligent argument from him? It's not just bad that he talks horrendously, he also very obviously avoids getting into any details. He's a shallow man, plain and simple.

He's a high-level kinda guy. You know, that guy at every office that, through nepotism, has attained management positions without working half as hard. The guy that jokes and grab-asses while everyone else hammers through a to-do list. Bush is, most certainly, that guy.

Why shouldn't we all expect an intelligent President?? He has a leeeetle bit more responsibility than the branch manager at some bank...

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 07:40 PM

Think back to Ollie North being characterized as a rogue.

Isn't the relationship between the Lebanese Hezbollah (The Party of God) to the official Lebanese government like that between Ollie North and the Reagan Administration?

Think of the UN resolution directing the Lebanese Hezbollah to disarm as the Boland Amendment to Reagan's Freedom Fighters.

It is definitionally impossible for a "terrorist" to engage in an act that can be characterized as an act of war; for only nations can do that.

Why not call a spade a spade, that we (the current set of US leaders) have already "lost" Lebanon to the terrorists in the War on Terror? When I use the word "lost" think in terms of Central America and the fear of the administration of being labeled as having "lost" one or another country to the Communists.

Lebanon had already been "lost."

We are in denial, as evidenced by the blame-game-need to point to someone else, like Syria. Unless the plot is, or was, to go after Syria all along?

I always believed that Reagan suffered from actually believing the rhetoric he spewed; Bush 2 seems to show the same gullibility. Perhaps he too gets his funding from, and takes direction from, Saudi Arabia. I predict, btw, that the recent record profits for foreign oil companies (including those traded on the US stock exchanges) will be shattered once again.

How does it feel to work for Saudi Arabia? How does it feel to have relinquished our nation's foreign policy to Saudi Arabia?

Posted by: Ron Ledbury at July 20, 2006 08:23 PM

Well said

Posted by: TKrueg at July 20, 2006 08:46 PM

Bill: I guess I somewhat identifiy myself with Bush. I have some of his traits in not being able to speak brillently, and having grown up on a farm and in the woods with plain speaking folks. And their mannerism are sometimes questionable-but they are people, and they met well.

TK: I have listened to several interviews (Barbara Walters, NBC News,etc.) where his dialogue was better than most poeples. If you know presidential history, you'll find many of our former presidents lacking several aspects that you are making fun of. Johnson and Ford in interviews were not spectacular, nor their writings. And I could go on. And those two are not thought of as our worst presidents. Trashing and bashing gets old. Then read some of Teddy Roosevelt's writings and quotes, or Hardy. Ever read/hear Clinton's cussing, or his wife's?

Posted by: Lee at July 20, 2006 08:57 PM

Gosh again, my spelling and tenses aren't all that great. I better proofread next time, I write like Bush.

Posted by: Lee at July 20, 2006 09:10 PM

This isn't about eloquence, as much as it is about substance. When he tells Putin with a straight face that he should try to make Russia more like Iraq, we are the laughingstock of the world. To go along with the most hated. Then there's that pitiful "Just wait." Yeah, George, that wonderful Iraq you promised is right around the corner.

What a dope. God help America.

Posted by: Jack Bog at July 20, 2006 09:19 PM

Bill; I do have several friends that come up and message a persons neck in knowing there is a lot of tension, stress present. Of course, some of my Italian friends even show some hugging occasionally. I'm sure some of us have families that naturally are more demonstrative than others and touching is normal. I've recently seen at public PDC meeetings members of commissions/committees coming up and giving a light touch, rub. Creepy? I didn't get a sense of ulterior motives.

Now, if Bill Clinton did it, that is creepy; as he did to a female friend of mine here in Portland, then asked her if she would like to join a more "private party" after the Portland fundraiser-that is creepy. Her husband was standing near to his wife when this happened.

Posted by: Lee at July 20, 2006 09:27 PM

Lee, there's a difference between being "plain-spoken" and being, as Jack said, a dope. There's nothing wrong with down-home wisdom from uneducated "country folk". The offense, here, is that there just ain't much wisdom in our President, down-home or otherwise.

Perhaps you identify with him, but GW Bush wasn't raised on a farm or in the woods. The man attended prep school in Andover, then graduated from Yale, and received an MBA from Harvard Business School for crying out loud. One might expect such a person could express a coherent thought once in a while. Instead he is, as I said up-thread, a buffoon.

And anyhow, when did we decide that it was important for our leaders to be "regular Joes"? Personally, I want the President to be a well-educated, well-spoken, yes even elite member of our society. He (or she) should represent the very best of our country. We deserve no less.

Er... on second thought, scratch that.

As John Adams reminded us over 200 years ago... "There was never a democracy that did not commit suicide." Perhaps we deserve exactly who we, collectively, put in office...

Posted by: David Wright at July 21, 2006 12:54 AM

Sorry TK, but I cannot let this one go...

"Let's not forget that Clinton actually did something about both Al-Qaeda and Iraq.... they're called 'surgical strikes', so they don't make for entertaining political power-grabs like Bush's war does for mass media."

I'm sorry but that is so incorrect that it's laughable. Clinton did very little to halt Al-Qaeda and missed several golden opportunities to take out Osama.

I'm no Bush apologist, but claiming that Clinton was anything more than ineffectual at dealing with Al-Qaeda is a total joke.

Posted by: Larry at July 21, 2006 08:12 AM

Larry- He did everything short of invading a country. He tried firing missles into what was thought to be Osama's camp (while the GOP screamed NO WAR FOR MONICA)... that it didn't kill Osama is hardly Clinton's fault. As Clinton's administration was briefing the incoming Bush cabinet, they warned them Osama and Al-Qaeda were an ongoing threat they'd worked really hard on... and Bush's team basically said, "OK thanks, we'll get to it". Then when 9-11 occurred, we use Iraq as some sort of angry punching bag?? Okaaaaaay.....

I seem to remember Bush saying a year or two ago (paraphrasing)about Osama that he "just doesn't think about him anymore... doesn't spend too much time on him".

Clinton HAD an anti-terrorism task force that Bush disbanded after he took office. Bush ignored intel. briefings. How can anyone say the Republicans are better for Nat'l Security??

Posted by: TKrueg at July 21, 2006 09:05 AM

"I seem to remember Bush saying a year or two ago (paraphrasing)about Osama that he "just doesn't think about him anymore... doesn't spend too much time on him"."

He is no longer wanted dead or alive, it would be better if we just all forget about him. He probably never had anything to do with 9/11 anyway, he just took credit for it to boost his reputation in the Middle East. I suspect that as the Bush years settle on the ash heap of history this will become the official story on Osama whats-his-name.

Posted by: tom at July 21, 2006 09:20 AM

"He did everything short of invading a country."

He did nothing of the sort. Clinton's responses to several terrorist attacks were extremely limited and weak.

Lobbing a few missiles into a camp that was already known to be deserted is not a strong response.

Telling fighter/bombers to stand down as they're getting ready to launch off an aircraft carrier on a mission to get Osama is not a strong response.

The attack on the USS Cole? We allowed the Yemeni authorities to absolutely handcuff our investigators. I can't imagine GWB doing the same.

The embassy bombings? Did anything come of that? No.

Remember how he insisted on calling the first WTC bombing a crime instead of an act of terrorism? So we captured a couple low-level operatives, sentenced them to prison, and did nothing beyond that to destroy the larger organization.

TK, I have no patience for folks who are Bush shills, but similarly I also have none for Clinton groupies. BOTH parties have been neglectful in dealing with the growing threat over the last 15 years....

Clinton may have been many things, but tough on terror was not one of them.

Posted by: Larry at July 21, 2006 09:50 AM

"BOTH parties have been neglectful in dealing with the growing threat over the last 15 years...."
Both parties have also been pretty much neglectful about Israels role in keeping the pot boiling in the Middle East as well. Looking the other way while Israel defends itself against Hezbollah by decimating Lebanese civilians isn't helping our cause in the Middle East either. Our lack of response in this situation may prove more dangerous then invading Iraq. I would also like to add that being critical of Israel doesn't make me or anyone else an Anti-Semite.

Posted by: tom at July 21, 2006 11:06 AM

Larry- Clinton's record on terrorism has been the subject of one smear and mischaracterization after another. The Right, knowing full well that Bush dropped the baton, has gone to great lengths to marginalize all the efforts Clinton put in place. I'm not saying you're a source of that, that simply you've echoing what has been tossed around from the pundit's perspective. Clinton knew that any overt occupation would stir the hornets nest more than quietly and covertly going after the cells.

Just to clarify, are you saying that Bush is or has done more to combat terrorism than Clinton did? What about Richard Clarke?

Posted by: TKrueg at July 21, 2006 11:19 AM

Totally in agreement with Tom... and let's not forget the monetary incentives for some wealthy elite in this country to keep the mideast in turmoil. Israel is a big customer of our defense contractors, and a neverending war for us means a steady gravy train for those same firms.

Eisenhower warned about the dangers of war profiteering after seeing what happened during WWII. If he had any idea our foreign policy would be partially dictated by it, to the extent we see today, his words would be even more dire. The Neocon wet-dream is our nightmare...

Posted by: TKrueg at July 21, 2006 11:26 AM

Oh yeah, Clinton and Richard Clarke really opened up a can of whuppass on Osama.

Al Qaeda torched two U.S. Embassies and attacked a US Navy Destroyer (the Cole), so Clinton tossed a couple of cruise missiles against a pharmaceutical fab and a few empty tents in the Desert.

Declare Victory and Go Home. Problem deferred.

Posted by: Mister T at July 22, 2006 07:33 AM

Mister T- So why did Bush wait until 9-11 to do anything? Prior to that point, they dropped many of the efforts and leads that Clinton's team was working on. They didn't even want to be briefed! They did so, only reluctantly, after Clarke begged them.

The moral of the story is, don't believe the GOP when they say they're the party for Nat'l Security.

Posted by: TKrueg at July 22, 2006 10:56 AM

Bush was too busy working on creating a strong economy. You remember what a strong economy was don't you? We had one for eight years before Bush came along. Once he screwed that up he decided to do the same for the Middle East. To paraphrase an old joke , It's too bad George can't do to Laura what he has been doing to the country for the last 4 years. Oh wait he's been doing that with Condoleeza.

Posted by: Tom at July 22, 2006 01:30 PM

[Posted as indicated; restored later.]


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics