Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 6, 2006 12:53 PM. The previous post in this blog was Two percent for Marx. The next post in this blog is He promised to exalt us, but low is the way. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, June 6, 2006

I love the smell of numbers cooking

Portland Commissioner Sam "the Tram" Adams has published a supposed life cycle cost analysis for the OHSU aerial tram [rim shot]. Under this analysis, the tram comes darn cheap. Be aware, though, that in Sam's world, trams last 50 years, major maintenance will be less than a half million dollars a year, nobody pays interest when they borrow tens of millions of dollars, and you don't need insurance. Oh, and the land and the design competition -- those don't count as costs to the city.

It's on the menu under "linchpins." Try it with the teriyaki sauce.

Comments (32)

I love the sequencing, too. Build it, then ask how much it will cost to run. Bankruptcy, here we come.

It'll last 50 years? Great, that way when the South Waterfront District is finally ready to contribute to the city tax revenue we can use the money to build another tram.

Would be interesting to compare to the 40 years that Jackson Hole got out of their tram, and Total Cost of Ownership.


In 50 years, I will be 75 years old. Maybe by then I will NEED the tram!

(That is unless some kind of flying personal transport is invented by then).

Harry: the Jackson Hole tram only operated for 8-9 hours per day, depending on the season.

If OHSU operates "their" tram for 18 hours per day, it is unlikely to last 10 years LONGER than Jackson Hole's.

And don't forget folks--Sam's Tram is closed on Sundays and holidays.


We really still do not know the "TRUE" life cycle cost. (TLCC)

As Jack posts, life cycle costs are usually performed early in proposed projects to determine their feasibility and comparisons to other possible solutions. "Waiting for the final construction bids, tram operation and maintenance contracts" as PDOT's Rob Bernard (tram project manager) posts is not standard procedure in TLCC.

In the tram's case, TLCC was requested over three years ago by the PATI Citizens Advisory Committee in a letter to city council. And again requested in Nov. O5 by the PDC NM Urban Renewal Advisory Committee to PDC and city council. Commissioner Adams promised a TLCC over seven months ago. You do not wait until a project is almost completed before you develop your TLCC, or you have something to hide. And what good does it do?

The tram's PDOT TLCC is missing some essential, normally included items that increases total cost substantially. Some items not included:
1)Financing costs on $57.7M hard costs plus on all costs incurred prior to construction.(Well over $3M per year)

2)Land Costs; two vacated streets w/land value of at least $4M

3)Design Competition and associated costs

4)PDC,PDOT, City Staff costs attributed to tram

5)Waived/reduced building permit/review costs

6)Special liability, etc. insurance

7)Federal/state Bond Costs for aerial rights over 1-5, Barbur and Macadam

The city's PDOT using a 50 year life cycle cost is also very suspect. Life expectancy of heavily used trams throughout the world has not achieved 50 year life spans. A more realistic life span, especially operating 18 hrs per day, 365 days a year (much more than most tram usage) would be 20 to 30 years. Your TLCC goes up as your life span decreases for a given period. Palm Springs had to replace their tram a few years ago at costs higher than it's initial cost.

Having the city's Portland Department of Transportation perform the LCC is also a "conflict of interest". Remember that PDOT's Matt Brown was
the "tram guru" who now works for Homer Williams/Developer in NM. Matt was a strong tram advocate who "mislead" many agencies and the public on the real tram hard costs. Having the same Department perform a LCC is unethical and not a general practice of those companies, agencies capable of performing a TLCC. Industry Planning groups frown on such practices. An "outside" TLCC should have been performed. Yes, my car only costs 18 cents per mile to operate.

As a member of NM URAC I am disappointed in the continuance of the "tram scam". I and others have projected at least a $260M TLCC for a 20 year period over a year ago based on the projected hard costs at that time ($45M). If all the items noted above were included in a TLCC for a 50 year period the TLCC total would be well over $325M and not the todays PDOT's projection of $273M.

When the tram's hard costs were projected to be $45M, the ridership cost for each trip was approaching $65 dollars based on PDOT/PDC trip total projections. Now, what will it be?

A gold plated cadillac ride with a tuxedo driver?

A week ago Sam said on his blog, "I'd like to believe we have nothing to hide"

This week the TLLC os hiding more of the SoWa folly.

Sam was provided these links below to assist in getting a legitimate TLLC.
He and PDOT chose to do their own.
They know they can come up with any number they want, not document any of it, never face any consequences and have their lap dog groopies (you know who you are) praise them for their work.
Private firm provides life-cycle cost analyses.
Life cycle cost analysis as a decision support tool for managing
municipal infrastructure
We work for government agencies. Our independence guarantees unbiased and untainted Life-Cycle Cost Analysis supported by facts and diligent research.
1. Perform a "reality check"
-All costs for the full system life cycle must be included.
Complete Product Life Cycle Cost Analysis Tool
Life Cycle Cost (LCC) analysis provides methodology for computing the cost of over its lifetime.
Life cycle cost tools endeavor to provide a picture of true cost over the life of your product.

I just called the Jackson Hole, Wyoming's Public Works Department and it DEFENDS their tram only lasting 50 or so years saying "How long would you last hauling Deadeye Dick Cheney's big, fat white @ss up the slopes all day long with his growing team of doctors, lawyers and syncophants?"

Hmmm... not very long, we guess.

Daphne: lap dog groupie AND one-trick pony....


I love it when you're angry. Would you be willing to call me on the phone and say "synchophant" over and over again?

"I want your linchpin..."


Given their willingness to build/operate the TRAM no matter how expensive it gets, I don't understand why they are trying so hard to low-ball the total cost.

The operating costs could double or triple, but we all know they're still going to operate it.

I don't understand why they feel the need to maintain the game of charades?

I and may other people would like to know what's going on here.

Did Commissioner Sam instruct Roland to post this reason why a professional life cycle cost was not prepared?

Has Mr. Barnard ever prepared a project life cycle cost before?

Who instructed Mr. Barnard to exclude debt service and other fundamental costs?

Who told Mr. Barnard what to include?

Was there an earlier draft or two?

Who Ok'd the final draft?

Did Mr. Barnard use professional Life Cycle cost estimating software or any other helpful means?

Is Mr. Barnard free to openly discuss his estimate?

Can Mr. Barnard be interviewed by a local journalist?

Can Commissioner Adams office obtain the full life cycle debt service costs?

If a professional company is willing to complete a thorough and complete full life cycle cost for a nominal fee will the city pay for it?

Will it take months to get
any more basic information?

Who keeps track of money spent on SoWa?

Where can one get a list of all SoWa payments to date with names or recipients and what the payment was for?

How many other projects in SoWa are over budget?
What is the current estimated budget overrun?
Where is a genuine SoWa budget to be found?

What is the current TIF interest rate the city is paying? What rate was used in the original 1999 SoWa plan estimates?

Should the city answer these question?

Pete Kohler may have recklessly endangered OHSU's fiscal stability right along with the PDC risking the city's.

His commitment of OHSU millions every year for decades towards this boondoggle Tram will hobble funding for all of their core missions.

OHSU employees should probably be up in arms.

Well, not the doctors.
The first SoWa OHSU building is owned by the OHSU doctors group, a 501c3, will pay no business taxes, no property taxes and no TriMet taxes. It will house doctors offices, a clinic, a health club, administration offices and "some research space".

All of which could have been acquired without the insane Tram.

But, it's not just the Tram.

The city is also providing the streets and other infrastructure as they poor millions into SoWa. The 1999 SoWa plan called for $288 million in projects and another $160 million in debt service over the first 20 years with millions more needed to retire the debt and to cover cost overruns.

It may be that the debt service itself is a much larger cost overrun than the Tram or the rest of the project overruns.
If the 1999 plan did not assume rising interest rates it may be that debt service is well on it's way to doubling.
ALL of which will be paid for decades with property taxes desperately needed by basic services general fund budgets.

That's why it is important to maintain updated and complete budgets.

Putting a happy face on this is no substitution for prudent management.

"""It'll last 50 years? Great, that way when the South Waterfront District is finally ready to contribute to the city tax revenue we can use the money to build another tram"""

Good one Bill.
That's about right too. It will indeed take around 50 years for the debts to be retired and the other losses break even.

At that point the city will need Urban Re-Renewal

Lord have mercy. There'd be more oxygen in these here parts if you weren't violating the living daylights out of the COMMENTS POLICY.

Cogent, salient, topical contribution.

Thanks Sebastian.

Lord have mercy. There'd be more oxygen in these here parts if elected officilas weren't violating the living daylights out of their FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES.

If the bond buyers want to maximize their "business" opportunity, and are complicit, who then would be the injured party to deceit? By the same token, would such knowing participation to defraud the little locals defeat the opportunity for the bond buyers to avail themselves of the benefit of judicial enforcement in any federal or state court, even a bankruptcy court?

If the DA had Mayoral ambitions then he could be like Rudy to Drexel. (Instead of a lazy slob, with no ambition; a common ordinary bum.)

There's a guy sleeping 15 feet from my bedroom, under the eve of a church; the DA better go do a "sweep" in the public interest similar to the demands of the St. Johns Negro Removal advocates, but this guy is easy pickin's because he's WHITE.

See generally Drexel Burnham Lambert.

A commenter at Amazon regarding "Den of Thieves" complains as follows:

"Anyone that knows anything about Milken knows that the guy created millions of jobs, and contributed much more to society than people like James Stewart, who often act like parasites at the expense of others."

There is always this kind of possibility:

Google diego pension "promoted to obtain better pension benefits"

Young Stennies:

From "Drexel Burnham Lambert: A Ten-Year Retrospective"
"Unlike other crusaders from Berkeley, I have chosen Wall Street as my battleground for improving society because it is here that governments, institutions and industries are financed." (Reportedly written by a 24 year old Milken)

It is all for a good cause, by any means necessary. I want the good folks at Orrick (and other bond counsel) put behind bars -- their obligation is to the locals and not the bond buyers. "Professional" parasites?

The DA is up for election in 2008. Who would bring charges in January 2009?

(Steve -- please keep good searchable records for such an event. Or write a book.)

Schopp 1 Sebastian nil.

I'll shoot for another.

It's more than a safe guess that not a single commissioner, either at the PDC or city council, (or their staff) can tell us how many $millions the PDC has already paid and is planning to pay OHSU during all this so called negotiations for Tram shares.

Since the South Waterfront Urban Renewal Citizens Advisory Committee, and their budget subcommittee has never been provided a running account, full budget or summary of money spent my bet is nearly a sure thing.

Equally bizarre is the inability for city hall groupies to recognize the recipe for fiscal calamity and maleficence this certainly represents.

Many of them toss out, with ease, all reasonable skepticism by way of "but look how pretty things are" or "you live in Tualatin, so shut up".

You got it SS. Last night I watched the documentary "Outfoxed" about how newsmedia gets co-opted by one political hard line. Very interesting. Made me think about the Goldschmidt gang's relationship to the big O.

But one thing I saw on Fox that I really liked was some citizens talking about the Kelo decision permitting local government to condemn private homes for economic development purposes. One guy used the other F word (fascist) to describe New London's relationship with the local redevelopment agency. I think Fox remains popular despite the fact that it is ANYTHING BUT fair and balanced because it allows discussion on issues the "left" isn't touching.

Hi boys. I am not angry. I'm part of the 75% (Zogby) of the USA that is way too busy laughing at W ad BigFatDick bringing "honor" and "integrity" back to the White House.

What's next, installing Goldy as White House pool lifeguard?

DeLay as Budget Director?

I'm laughing so hard I'm crying.


Can we assume you see a linkage between City Hall's lying about and hiding South Waterfront's financial woes, and the Bush Administration's lying and hiding from their critics?

If there is no linkage, then please find another thread to discuss Bush/Cheney.

Speaking of cooked numbers, did anyone read yesterday's Trib article about Portland mass transit? (with apologies to Jack for hijacking the thread...)

Larry scores a DIRECT HIT on Mister T, sending him back to his drink, minus the mix.

Gosh, I loved the "A Team". Didn't you?

Once again -
It appears "prominent," "reputable," "responsible," "heavyweight," citizens, or citizens otherwise described in the Oregonian, have become so morally seduced as to feel comfortable enough to bribe or blackmail city officials, lie, or hide facts from City Council in order to obtain taxpayer monies for their pet project.

It is time for citizens, if not the Portland City Council, to demand an immediate, complete and independent investigation with the objective of recovering those taxpayer funds paid to the City by its taxpayers.

It should include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following objectives:

1. Recover the additional tram costs from those responsible individuals and organizations found culpable for the increased costs;

2. Consider the potential of charging responsible parties with bribing/blackmailing a city official;

3. Because federal funds are involved, request the local Federal Attorney General to investigate whether the $11 million Commissioner Leonard states was granted OHSU (requiring a $3.5 million payment from the City of Portland) was based on fraudulent actions.

To allow "Portland heavyweights," or anyone, for that matter, to play fast and loose with taxpayer monies for any reason, particularly based on false and material misrepresentation, should not be condoned by Portland City Council or any city council in Oregon.

It sends a terrible message to those many citizen volunteers who give freely of their time and efforts participating in public/private partnerships on behalf of their city.

By not seeking the return of the funds, City Council sends the message that they will condone the formulation of public policy based on lies.

Or, they are, in fact, complicit in defrauding the public.

Without an immediate Council endorsed independent investigation, the "lets-burn-the-taxpayers" smell mentioned in a recent Oregonian editorial becomes immune to any political, legal, or ethical disinfectant. The smell eventually sticks to Portland's Council chambers and our city in general.

And we, the taxpayers, get burned while City Council fiddles a happy tune.

Jack, instead of teriyaki, I think you need a jerk rub?

(sorry, I couldn't resist)

Shadow: I hope your call for fed/state/co attorney general investigations become a reality. There is enough substance in all the information publically known about the tram and North Macadam to request investigations. I wondar who will have the political will to step up.

Citizens should be strongly requesting the investigations, and I hope the media joins in. Nibbling at the edges won't do it as the media is doing. State it like it is. Ryan Frank's article on Portland's Urban Renewal Districts with its midleading headline is a prime example of "editorizing" an article.


I wouldn't hold out much hope with headlines like these from the big "O".

"Officials clear Saif of wrongdoing
Workers' comp - The corporation was "sloppy" in turning over records but didn't break the law, investigators say
Friday, June 09, 2006"

when the stories have content like this buried in them....

The investigators said that, with two exceptions, the people and agencies they contacted cooperated. One exception was Cohen, who refused to cooperate with the investigation without a grant of immunity from criminal prosecution.
The other exception was Katherine Keene, who resigned as Saif president in December 2003, after the disclosure that the insurer had a $40,000-a-month consulting contract with a firm headed by former Gov. Neil Goldschmidt. When state police investigators asked to interview Keene, she invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination, the report said.

I guess this is what it feels like to be trickled on...

The good people at PDOT failed to include the effect of WIND on the "parrafin type of oil" that must be applied to the Tram's cables ("ropes" on the below Q&A) annually. Does anybody actually believe it will fall exclusively on the sidewalks?

Q: Will the oil from the ropes drip onto homes below? How frequently will the ropes be oiled?
A: The ropes are over the curb of the street so are not close to homes on Gibbs Street. The ropes will need to be oiled annually. The Doppelmayr representative present at the meeting stated that he did not believe that the oil will drip as it is a paraffin type of oil. If oil does drip from the ropes, property owners should document and report the damage to the City’s Risk office for investigation and resolution. There also will be a Tram Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC) that can help to resolve neighborhood concerns over tram operations.

Should the tram be christened "Sam's $50 million Erection"?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics