Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 2, 2006 5:11 PM. The previous post in this blog was Fascinating. The next post in this blog is Crowded house. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, March 2, 2006

Close six more schools?

The current budget mess at the Portland School District has reports circulating that six more schools may have to be closed. The term "downward spiral" is definitely coming to mind.

Don Smith, who's running for City Council, sent me a statement on this today that might get an interesting (ahem!) conversation going. He writes in part:

San Francisco is the Portland of 2020 in many ways. A booming city center that is too expensive for middle-class families and a suburban outlying area with many schools that outperform their inner-city rivals. Portland is seeing this exodus now and has a chance to stop it. To quote Kris Anderson, Irvington parent, from last night's school-funding town hall meeting, "There is going to be a massive exodus, and you will never get these children back."

Coincidentally, I read an article last night outlines about how San Francisco has moved to a decentralized, follow-the-kid funding model that has raised performance in every single school in the district without raising costs. Essentially, kids can apply to any school in their district and there is a funding formula that gives schools more money for attracting special-ed, low-income, or non-English-speaking kids.

We are in crisis mode right now, but the reason the voters aren't willing to pony up is that they won't spend money on a jalopy. We want at least a late-model Chevy, but San Francisco has proven we can get a luxury car for standard-model pricing.

Vicki Phillips said last night that closing more schools is on the table. Which schools will be closed? That will be decided by Central Administration. Not the parents. Not the kids. In other words, not the customers. If closing our schools is on the table, then why wouldn't this be? At least give the schools the chance to individually improve enough to justify staying open rather than closing another Smith Elementary (one of the best in the system).

Join me in urging our leaders, specifically Vicki Phillips, to consider putting the weighted-student funding option on the table immediately. SF had a one-year pilot and went full-scale in year two. I see no reason we couldn't do the same. The communities and parents in particular have been wildly enthusiastic about the revitalization of their neighborhood schools.

As we say on the final exams, "Discuss."

Comments (25)

At the risk of being verbally bludgeoned to death, I'll toss out that "...a decentralized, follow-the-kid funding model that has raised performance in every single school in the district without raising costs." is just more rearranging the pieces on the board while the whole district goes bankrupt.

And there's already been a massive exodus of students which shows few signs of slowing down. Those leaving aren't going to be slowed down by another "promise" from PPS or the county or city. They're leaving because they can't afford to live here. The schools aren't the reason - thats a red herring that serves only to provide cover for the usual suspects to avoid taking responsibility and making tough decisions.

"Vicki Phillips said last night that closing more schools is on the table. Which schools will be closed? That will be decided by Central Administration. Not the parents. Not the kids. In other words, not the customers."

Closing schools better be on the table and why shouldn't Central Administration decide? It's part of their job! The parents and kids are not the only customers - they're a minority of the customers. It's ridiculous to think that they would ever agree to closing any schools. The board has a responsibilty to all the taxpayers - not just those with children.

I'll save Randy Leonard and the other drones the trouble of the usual demagoguery - I hate children because I'm a greedy, selfish a**hole.


I appreciate the skepticism. I think parents who have left aren't going to come back based on a promise. But if a school district the size of SF can have the kinds of improvement they've seen in just 4 years, we're likely to have a similar result, so let's debate it.

Besides, why do you hate children? Oh, wiat, you beat me to the punch. LOL.

Seriously, I'm a choice advocate. I think Kremer's on the right track, but politically it won't fly here. If you look at SF's experience it has saved the very schools that were "ghetto" and "horrible" to hear it told. There are public school advocates out there (Mike Miller is one) who believe that the only solution is to force poor kids to go to their bad neighborhood school until the district gets around to making it a good one. Experience has taught us that only competition makes things better. (See, e.g. any monopoly on anything)

SF has demonstrated that opening to competition within a district and MOST IMPORTANTLY giving each school control of its own funds makes all of the schools better.

I just want the option looked at and honestly explored.

I can't have kids because I can't stop reading this blog long enough to go do what is necessary. Your fault, Jack!

What I'm curious to know is, would people take a voluntary 25% cut in their estimated house value if it meant that more people with kids could move in next door?

I think part of what's happening in Portland is the "aging in place" problem. People move in, their kids go to the schools and then people stay in that house even though their kids are long gone. I graduated from PPS over 15 years ago and yet many of my old friends' parents are still in the same houses they were living in when I graduated. Makes it awfully hard to have families move in if people won't leave. Not saying they have to leave, but it just reduces the housing stock within PPS boundaries.

These school funding threads are always good for a laugh, as the tightwads come out of the woodwork to assure us that they don't hate kids, they just hate the idea of providing them with an adequate education.

Don't think of them as 6 closed schools. Think of them as 6 new McMenamins.

I break that joke out every round of cuts and it's getting old: The joke and the cuts.

Yet another event proving the total political ineptitude of Paul Allen. Honestly, could he have picked a WORSE time to come to the people of Portland with a tin cup in his hand?

Let me pose this question

Given that WA is paying 6% of school payroll towards pensions and Oregon is paying 20% of school payroll towards pensions,
are we to do nothing about this while our schools
are devastated?

If our school employees were paid 66% more than Washington towards their pensions it would be half of what we pay now and result in a huge.

Do our unions claim that getting 66% more than their equals in Washington is not enough?

Well thank god the Oregon kicker goes back to out-of-state corporations instead of saving our schools. Being shamed in Doonsebury wasn't enough, maybe we should do a comparison to some third world countries and show how bad we treat our kids here. How did we ever end up in a mess where Karen Minnis and her ilk were able to buoy up more money per kid for rural schools, but leave Portland to dry up and die.

Rickynagg, have you set foot in a Portland school in the past five years? Are you friends with a single staff person for PPS? You seem quick with the cliches of the VRNM, but how about being in touch with Portland? Or does Lars Larson keep you as informed as you need to be? And, how do you feel about in addition to short changing the kids out of a decent education we strap them with 30K in federal debt. Call that the "birth tax." You cool with the borrow-and-spend Republicans running the show and the see-saw of Oregon tax revenue that comes with state taxes tied to federal taxes?

craaack, splinter!

there, I'm out again.

Don, I don't doubt the efficacy of the SF model at doing what it was designed to do. It's just that I don't think it addresses the problems here. It's just another (probably) good solution in search of a problem. I'm not saying there aren't wide disparities in school quality in PPS, they just aren't the main problem.

I just don't think we can afford to wait and see while another "solution" gets batted around by the district, PAT, the teachers, parents and all the myriad "stakeholders" that come out of the woodwork to tell us were all tightwads if we question ANY aspect of business as usual. If the proposed solution isn't comprehensive, susutainable and saleable, it just prolongs the agony. Even accomplishing its intended goals "...without raising costs." doesn't cut it. We're already $57 million in the hole.


I already said I hated kids.

It's Bush's fault.

or Lars', or the corporate kicker's, or Karen Minnis', or, oh, you've got the list... Just don't look over there...under the PAT sign. They only threaten to strike "for the children".

Screw Doonesbury, he your moral compass? Gosh, he's better than Lars. Far more sanctimonious, at least.

I've lived here for over 50 years and have a child in high school in the PPS. I'm deeply involved at her school and will continue to be - for her sake! I have a brother and sister-in-law who have taught here for 30 years and I don't belong to ANY organizations. I don't have to justify anything to you, but I'm polite - and you asked.

Lars doesn't pull my strings - but he obviously jerks your chain.

Try your talking points and insults on somebody else.


Those darn folks who are "aging in place" do have and have had the good grace to die, eventually. I guess that's "leaving".

I have sent Don Smith links before on voucher and choice programs. Their performance as a method of cutting costs and improving performance is mixed at best (the most recent evidence shows a small improvement in performance in voucher programs with no cost savings).

Don's proposal is a thinly veiled choice proposal.

Schools aren't like boxes of cereal on your store shelf. You can't just take the Wheaties off the shelf if folks don't buy them any more. Schools require significant capital investment.

What I find ironic about this proposal is that Don claims to be looking out for the kids when opposing a plan to close schools... yet hasn't he posted in other fora complaining about the cost structure of PPS?

The small and underpopulated schools are likely the ones to be closed. In that respect, students and families *are* the ones talking.

Portland Public IS a district of choice.

Any family can apply to ANY school in the district. They put down their top three choices, and it's a lottery system for the kids that aren't part of that neighborhood. A kid in the Abernathy School neighborhood can apply to Irvington, Chapman, and Kelly, for instance.

They can also apply to Portland Public sponsored charter schools, of which there are several, including Emerson, Opal, Trillium, and several new charters this year including a Waldorf school. Each charter school has it's own lottery system, separate from the general PPS system. A parent can apply to their top three choices in the regular PPS system, PLUS then apply to all the charters.

So it's ill-informed to say that PPS is not a district of choice. The dollars DO follow the student. And Title 1 schools- schools with a population of 40% students who qualify for free and reduced lunch, which is the way poverty is defined- receive money that non-Title 1 schools do not, for additional services determined by need.

Those are the facts.

The Mrs and I fit the demographic. We are young professionals that live close in Irvington. We both work downtown and enjoy the 15-minute door-to-door commute. The convenience of the commute and the nearby shopping, restaurants etc. made it easy to overlook being burglarized and the occasional car prowl. As much as we like living here, the school situation is why we are going to pull the plug. We are not alone, at least half of the houses on our block have turned over and only one family with children has moved in. Our plan is to head to Washington where we can choose a good school district with stable financing and a neighborhood where there is some space. It is too bad, but for the schools we would probably stay.

Okay, I'm not crazy about the my taxes either, but that is a different thread.

Let me politely suggest that all the educational philistines responding to this post, especially Don Smith, take the time to read the reactions of the Neighborhood Schools Alliance to Vicki Phillips' proposals for school closures.

I recommend Ruth Adkins piece "Lost in Translation", Mike Miller's "Heckuva job, Vicki!", and my own take on school choice.

Send your reactions either to the NSA site or to my blog.

I can see the benefits of the choice mode. San Fran's plan sounds like a voucher program, which I have no problem with in the grand scheme of things, but about which I would have stability concerns. How far ahead could a school plan under such a funding model? 1 year? 3 years? 6 years? Unless there was a provision to provide adequate funding for the schools, outside of student choice, then I'd be a little concerned about the long-term health of the system.


You missed my point entirely. I said that this is not to reduce budgets, it's to increase performance without increasing our budgets. It's also not a thinly veiled anything. Choice is a completely different model (one I proudly back). However, this is a model that operates within the public school model and that is different from charter schools or magnet programs.

The thrust is that principals are hired, given a budget for them and a single staff person. Then, tehy get money based on how many kids enroll in their school. What programs they fund and what type of kid they try to atttract is up to them. More "expensive" kids (spec-ed, ESL, etc) get more money from the district.

San Francisco's result is that even their worst schools have gone from 3's on a scale of one to ten to 6s and 7s, and their 7s and 8s have gone to 9s and tens.

This is not a solution in search of a problem. There is a huge disparity in our schools and there's been a slide in our overall quality. The people of Portland don't want to give more tax dollars to a crappy system and I'm with them on that.

Just closing schools won't solve the problem. We need a new model.

We know the system in PPS is broken, we know there is too much going towards pension costs, we know parents are leaving, we know people are fed up, so what can we do to force fundamental change? Do we just let things continue until the PPS goes belly up?

As for a comment made about Portland getting too expensive...It's not any cheaper in the close in 'burbs with good schools. People aren't leaving Portland because they are getting "pushed out" due to high housing costs. They're getting out for a bigger newer house in a pretty new neighborhood with nice paved roads and amenities like enough police and basic services that Portland ignores.

I read some stats a while back that the average Portlander's income is declining. This isn't because people's paychecks are being decreased, but because the person moving into the city is a "lower" demographic than the ones moving out to the 'burbs. Remember, it's the "creatives" that the city is trying to attract, not the professionals who coincidentally probably make more money than the "creatives".

I'm curious why Don and others haven't responded to Mary's post. She is right -- Portland already has the SF system you are referring to. I don't remember the exact stats, but I think something like 70%+ of all intra-PPS transfer requests are granted. So kids are already choosing, and the money follows them.

School Voter:

Regarding Mary's post, the SF model isn't just about choice. The critical aspect is that schools, individual schools, determine their budgets, program offerings, hiring of teachers, length of school year, etc.

The number of kids who sign up for a given school based on its attractiveness to families determines that principal's budget. We don't have that system at all.


Welcome to Washington.

My Mrs. and I have been happy raising our kids here. Started in PPS, but with Measure 5 looming (this was a long time ago) we thought we could see what was coming and, lo, it has come to pass.

Plus we haven't seen any syringes on the school playground like we did almost daily in Portland.

I used to love Portland and still think it has some fine things going for it. Unfortunately, its local government and schools aren't among them and, in our opinion anyway, have had a corrosive effect on some of the things we used to like.

FYI, I think the article Don references was in "Reason" magazine, the propaganda arm of the Libertarian Party.

And yes, I read the same article, and yes, the magazine comes to my house, but I promise, it was a gift!

Quality of education or fiscal discipline: they are really two separate issues.

In the midst of all the shouting about whether or not to give PPS more money, who is asking for a detailed public audit by a private and independent entity as to where PPS is spending or using the money it already has?

Naysayers to the public audit concept usually say that PPS just wouldn't shell out the funds to pay an auditor, or that an auditor won't do their job too thoroughly in the interest of getting rehired each year.

How about a self-funding audit of PPS (or any public entity, for that matter)? Allow an auditing firm to keep 10% of any systematic waste found, and 50% of any fraud leading to a criminal conviction. Let independent auditing firms estimate what they'd find and submit competitive bids to pay PPS for the opportunity to audit.

Audit rights go to the highest bidder. PPS doesn't pay a penny, and the auditor only makes money if they find enough waste or fraud. PPS would only make money on the deal.

All findings would become part of the public record. I'm sure the auditor would find lots of waste that PPS would refuse to recognize as waste, but that would end up in the courts and would give the taxpayers plenty of time to observe and comment.

Is this a pipedream? Can anyone point out a solution that has actually fixed our school funding problem?


I hate to break it to you but the Libertarian party is far too disorganized and factional to have a propaganda arm. :) Trust me on that.

Reason is, however, libertarian. Just lower case. And it's got scathing commentary on issues that bashes both sides of the aisle. Love it.

But read articles in SF Gate and the Bay Guardian about it. Even the SFUSD web site has info on the weighted formula funding program. It's very well regarded. The Trib had an atricle in their ReThinking Schools pullout about Edmonton that I missed until today, too. Edmonton pioneered the concept.


That is not accurate. That is the rhetoric but not the reality. It was apparent to me when I moved here, and I broke my financial back to get into the Duniway district.

"Why do it?" people asked me, this is a choice system. You can always just choose Duniway.

But I'd lived through such systems once fiscal strain hit. And that reality has hit PPS.

Many, many schools now have lotteries and can only fill a small number of their "choice" slots.

The era of a "choice" system in Portland has ended.

Don, honestly i don't know enough of the specifics of the San Fran system. The city has undergone dramatic demographic shifts, however, so I'd be leery of attributing all improvements to a choice system.

My worry with any choice system is the infrastructure costs required to build a school system. So say a principal doesn't do a good "sales" job. What do you do? Can the principal? Close the school? But the kids have to go somewhere...and the other schools are now overcapacity. So you build another? Or a new principal in the old one?

Schools just don't work that way.


Jim P. and Pat : we are in the same boat. Can you email me with some ideas about where to look? I need to commute down I-205 to Reed College, but can travel on off hours. Email is


It's just been implemented and SF DOES attribute the change to the system. They point to nothing else to explain it.

And, yes, you do just can the principal if it doesn't work out. However, principals work with neighborhood groups to determine the kind of schools those families want (market research) and concentrate on that kind of school. Highly immigrant neighborhood? Bilingual focus school. Regular neighborhood? Regular neighborhood school. And so on.

Also, this is not a funding fix. It's a quality fix that makes Portlanders more likely to be willing to fund the schools.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics