Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 16, 2006 10:53 PM. The previous post in this blog was Oregon at age 147: sick. The next post in this blog is Skot reflects on Torino. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, February 16, 2006

The Tram That Would Not Die

Just as I thought, speculation that the OHSU Medical Group aerial tram [rim shot] is on its last legs was greatly exaggerated. Our correspondent, Butterbean*, closely followed the press event in the SoWhat district this morning, and he reports that it was just a p.r. spiel from the promoters of the emerging Condo Towers Amidst the Contamination.

Oh, and I swear, I am not making this up, Sharon Kitzhaber, the ex-guv's ex-wife, is the new SoWhat ambassador to the condo-buying public. Sing with me, people: "It's a small world, after all...." Not to disrespect "Louie, Louie," but that annoying Disney classic ought to be the theme song of Portland. They definitely need to have it going 24/7 on the Muzak system at the SoWhat "discovery center." ("Honey? I just discovered that my wallet is missing!")

Meanwhile, the City Council tram "work session" originally scheduled for tomorrow got pushed back a week, but apparently it's full steam ahead now that the mayor is back from his CIA mission to Taiwan. It sounds like Sam "the Tram" Adams and some others on the council (they're there for now, at least) are going to come up with more "urban renewal" (a.k.a. Average Joe property tax) revenues to throw at the tram, currently budgeted at $55 million, up from the original liars' budget of about one-fourth that. Suit yourself, guys, we'll see two of you at the ballot box very soon.

And did you catch how the negative polls that killed the school tax had disgruntled voters complaining about the tram? Note to Mayor Potter: If you want to save the schools, first you'll have to kill the tram. More study committees and a couple of road trips to Salem (BTW, stay out of the Chinese restaurants down there) won't be enough with the Most Irresponsible Public Works Project Ever staring voters in the face.

Meanwhile, OHSU is actively advertising for a new tram operator, now that Mike Lindberg's nonprofit corporation, which was supposed to get the gig, is being folded up in irrelevance (or was that disgrace?). The request for proposals is here, according to a reliable source. There's all kinds of interesting tram stuff in there (and in the form contract), including the proposal that the tram operator will take out $15 million of liabililty insurance, which will also cover OHSU and the city.

And the Pill Hill types are still eagerly talking with the city about which of them will actually do what, once this monstrosity is supposedly up and "running." Says OHSU:

Pursuant to a Memorandum of Understanding between OHSU and PDOT [Portland Department of Transportation], OHSU and PDOT have agreed that they will work together collaboratively on tram operations. OHSU will serve as the lead agency in issuing a Request for Proposals for a Tram Operator, selecting a Tram Operator, negotiating a contract with the Tram Operator, and supervising the Tram Operator's performance, all with the input and concurrence of PDOT. OHSU and the Portland City Council will formalize this relationship in an Intergovernmental Agreement that is currently being negotiated and is subject to approval. References to OHSU herein refer to OHSU acting as the lead agency. OHSU's authority to negotiate and/or contract for Tram Operations is subject to the Intergovernmental Agreement referred to above.
They say they want someone with "demonstrated experience in aerial passenger ropeway operations." Hmmm, that's either a ski resort owner or the Klan, no?

Prospective bidders, if you really want this one, let me give you some advice: Hire one of the good old boys' wives.

* - Not his real name. He uses "Butterbean" only to escape assault while incarcerated.

Comments (34)

Wow.... the place will be so devoid of community that they've got a social activities director? What next? RAs in the dorms, er, condos?

"These people will come out of their beautiful homes and what is there to do? So I will be in place helping them to come together to create activities and opportunities where they can get to know each other."

"Shuffleboard on the greenway at 4!"

If this is true, then I see what Sam Adams meant by the tram not having a blank check. Instead, the tram will have a filled-in check with lots more money.

The tram is going ahead, folks. The only trick is how to get three votes on the City Council for a much bigger city contribution, and still give four of them a way to say they're against it.

You can bet they've been working on it. The scapegoats are gone. Now it's time to hand out some more city taxpayer pork.

Nothing like a delightfully delicious and devilish detail to start to the day.

Thanks for the “Ropeway Operator’s” RFP.

Skip on down to Item 15 (Hours of Operation): “No Sunday or Holiday Service.”

Isn’t the “compelling purpose” for all this supposed to be an internationally-acclaimed tourist attraction? How does that work if it’s closed on Sundays and Holidays?

Is this how we’ll monitor the Republicans when they come to town for their national convention?

Bog: The only trick is how to get three votes on the City Council for a much bigger city contribution,
JK: And with two of them up for re-election. Not up for election: Randy, Sam & Potter.

Didn't Randy swear not one cent more? Where do three votes come from? Broken promise or a broken re-election campaign?

The C&Es should be verrry intersting.

Thanks
JK

I assume that most of you are involved in your respective Neighborhood Associations and I'm sure that you respect the effort and time it takes to build community. With that said, if you want to direct your negative remarks at fiscal management of the southwaterfront...fine, but please don't make fun of a community that has yet to form. They need our support, not our sarcasm.

Thanks.

"... road trips to Salem (BTW, stay out of the Chinese restaurants down there)"

Hey now. Kwan's is excellent, as is the teensy hole-in-the-wall Tong King Garden on SE 12th.

Can't say as I'll ever darken the doorstep of Golden Palace again, though.

You have to admit, the tram will make it easier for Junior Kitzhaber to join his dad for lunch at the OHSU commissary.

Couple of other Tidbits from the “Aerial Ropeway Operator” RFP:

First, all bets are off if at least two of the operator’s “principals” don’t have “substantial experience in the operation of ‘aerial passenger ropeways.’” Can’t begin to guess how much or how long any of that has to be.

Last, the Judge and Jury is OHSU and nobody else. Others get to serve on the “Evaluation Committee,” but their votes don’t count. “OHSU may reject any Proposal … upon a finding of the OHSU that it is in its [OHSU] best interest to do so…”

Not sure what all that might mean. It’s not uncommon for RFPs to be non-events because no qualified submissions are received. Bid opening is scheduled for March 1 though.

Still processing why “Ropeway Rides” won’t be part of next year’s 4th of July celebration. I’m broken-hearted!

I'm with ya, Kari -

"These people will come out of their beautiful homes and what is there to do? So I will be in place helping them to come together to create activities and opportunities where they can get to know each other."

Whatever will they do??? You gotta be kidding me. Are these foreign exchange students or something? Maybe California really IS a foreign state. Are we going to spring for "Oregon as a Second Language?"

Lynette: with all due respect, you must be new in town. What tends to happen with the neighborhood associations is that a certain faction that defines itself as ULITMATELY PROGRESSIVE takes over the debate. Legitimate legal concerns cease to matter. Facts cease to matter. (See Jack's recent post on neigborhood concerns from a few days ago). Lots of people who read this blog have been there and done that. Laughing about it is good therapy.

please don't make fun of a community that has yet to form. They need our support, not our sarcasm.

Lady, we are going to have some fun with you.

They already have our "support" in the form of deferred property taxes and municipal subsidies. As if they needed it. The people who move into those condos are going to have a much greater capability of paying the legitimate property taxes than 90% of the Portland population, yet they get a deferral. That deserves our sarcasm.

As for short-term and long-term, I remain unconvinced. How many years will it be before the deferrals are covered? 20? 30? 50? Before they tear down the ugly old buildings and start anew with yet another URP?

"please don't make fun of a community that has yet to form."

Lynnette - My property tax dollars and my friends schoolchildren are losing school funding to help form this community, why can't I make fun of it?

Being jaded and cynical never solves anything, even if it is veiled in laughter. Misery does, however, love company... this blog proves it.

As someone who has lived in Portland five years (still new by your standards, I'm sure)and has participated in the NA system, I can tell you that the experience is what you make it. Things cease to matter when you stop caring. I'm not saying participating is easy... it's very difficult. Buck up and get back into the game and maybe you'll change things. Whining gets you nowhere.

Steve,

Not all property taxes in the Pearl are diverted to repay the urban renewal bond (only the value assessed above the fixed base). The fixed base is allocated to other taxing jurisdictions. It ain't much (in relation to the diverted amount), but it's what you would get it if urban renewal didn't happen and the Pearl was a desolate warehouse district.

Fortunately for you, your kids, their kids and so on... the urban renewal period for the River District (which encompasses more than the Pearl) will end and then all of the tax revenues will be YOURS. Until then, support what will become a large source of revenue for Portland and specifically, your family.

That's why you shouldn't make fun of it.

PS You shouldn't shoot yourself in the foot either.

But Lynnette - what about the taxes that would have been paid on that property had the city merely allowed it to be developed (and remained ON the tax rolls) as several prior developers wanted to do? And don't deferrals sometimes get renewed?

And I think you're making an awful big assumption when you say things like, "Buck up and get back into the game and maybe you'll change things." Some of us here that post are very involved in our communities. Some of us volunteer our butts off, which only makes us MORE po'd when we see million dollar condo owners who pay $200 a year in property taxes.

If I remember right, you're the same gal who tried telling us that there are tons of children and middleclass folks living in the Pearl, and I find that hard to swallow as well.

I laud your desire to build "community". Unfortunately, the communities you speak of (the Pearl, the SoWhat) are FAR outside the reach of 80% (my guess) of Portland residents....

Lynette

That arguement sounds fine until you look at something like the recent purchase of the Public Storage building in southwaterfront, and you find that the current tax assessment has nothing to do with the reality of what the property should be valued at or what the City paid for it with your tax dollars.

The problem is the theory is good the pesky reality of the situation is what breeds the cycnacism and how the system seems to be manipulated to benefit a few folks.

I may be wrong, of course you can't track the obvious at this point. The difference in the assessed value of the Public Storage Property, what it actually sold for, and what tax "increment" it would pay because it went into public ownership, but if the ratio holds up, it would make for some interesting math.

No, Lynette, I have never stopped caring. But have come to the conclusion that participating in the neighborhood associations is not the best way to solve problems in Portland. I used to believe as you do, that the experience was what you make it, so in the late 1990s, I convinced a couple of my neighbors that we could solve a particular problem through the neighborhood associations. Our problem at the time was that we had followed all the city's requirements for creating a local improvement district to fix our street. But some of our "neighborhood leaders" decided they did not like local improvement districts. I would argue that they had many valid points-especially when it comes to developer generated LIDs-and they raised some good issues when it came to citizen LIDs like ours as well. So I called them to talk about it. The one who did return my call hung up on me for disagreeing with her on a point. My theory is that these two were sicked on our project by Vera to divert attention away from the developer LID projects-the old divide and conquer tactic. They got an award from the mayor. And my neighbor paved the street by the bootleg. Lawlessness begets lawlessness. Now I see the neighbors who had given up as wiser than I. Bring on the sarcasm.

Larry,

How long did the property of the pearl and southwater front lay in wait for a developer? And what happened with the particular developers you referenced?

The Pearl today is a long cry from its roots. It took vision, planning and patience to get us to where we are today. It didn't just happen because someone built a condo tower. It happened because someone had a master plan and has worked hard (and is still working hard) to make it a neighborhood rather than a project. I honestly don't think this could have been achieved by an individual developer...

And just because you think that only 20% of Portland are able to enjoy this community (see the thread under "When Condo Mania is a Bust), that doesn't make building community here any less valid than any other neighborhood.

Lynnette -

But the problem is that places like the Pearl are "building their community" on the backs of the rest of us. You know, the silent majority here in town that don't have the income to afford the condos whose owners are not required to pay property taxes.

Just answer this one question for me, Lynnette. Do you personally think it's fair that a $200k homeowner will pay a couple thousand dollars in property taxes with a $1m condo owner may pay a tenth of that?

The Pearl didn't come about because of a sudden influx of "vision, planning, and patience", it was because of a sudden financial giveaway. And what do you mean a developer couldn't handle that project? Who do you think built all the other communities in this city over the last 100 years?

Others here have more knowledge than I do (and I hope they chime in), but it's no secret that developers were stopped several times in their tracks in their quest to develop the SoWhat area. They had plenty of "vision, planning, and patience". But I guess the city felt like they had more.

Cynthia,

I'm truly sorry about your experience. Obviously, it really impacted you. :-( Like you, I see the value in having different avenues to getting my goals met. I don't rely on my NA alone, but I do respect its efforts enough not to treat it with sarcasm. Sarcasm is destructive and I don't want to tear people down (even if I disagree with them).

Thanks!

Goodbye, Lynnette.

LF, I doubt you knew what impact your posts would have, but... well, you could hardly have struck more nerves if you'd been trying.

Go back and read some archives (in particular anything to do with the tram or the SoWa development) and you might see why your posts got such a hostile reception: You're (indirectly) standing up for property owners that have, in the eyes of this particular community, already received a great deal of undeserved charity at the community's expense. These folks won't willingly give them any more, even if all you're asking for is kind words.

Although I can't say for sure, I suspect Jack decided to give you a timeout to forestall a raging bonfire of a flamewar.

I had no intention of "flaming" Lynette; I was trying to carry on a conversation with her. And I think our interchange is instructive as to why this doesn't seem possible in Portland: our forums for problem solving and conversation-neighborhood associations and the press, among others are being manipulated to the advantage of insiders whether or not they are operating within the realms of the law (and good taste for that matter). (I gave an example from my neighborhood above. Those of us who try to play straight and to keep the conversation going get cast as those who can't tolerate disagreement, when actually,methinks, it is the other way around. My guess is that Jack sees through this. But let him speak for himself. My opinion is that sarcasm an understandable method of communicating in such a sick twisted place. And it might even be the duty of the literate.

lynnette fusilier 2/17, 2006 07:28 AM They need our support, not our sarcasm.
JK: They already got our support:
$200 million in the Pearl.
$500 million (projected by critics) in your SoWhat.

lynnette fusilier 2/17, 2006 12:57 PMFortunately for you, your kids, their kids and so on... the urban renewal period for the River District (which encompasses more than the Pearl) will end and then all of the tax revenues will be YOURS. Until then, support what will become a large source of revenue for Portland and specifically, your family.
JK: And we will start getting those tax payments? About 30 years AFTER they decide not to extend the life of the UR district any more. Just in time to educate your great-grand childern. Assuming that they don't qualify for a new UR by then. Or maybe an historical tax freeze. Or just tear down all those obsolete buildings and build a new community.

And what will all those payments be worth? —$0.10-0.25 on the dollar due to the time value of money? And in the meantime, they don’t just pay almost nothing, but ALL OF US PAY FOR THEIR BASIC SERVICES. Bunch of tax freeloaders.

BTW do you work for PDC, a developer, or in any field that financially benefits from urban renewal or urban planning, including building toy trains all over town?

Thanks
JK

Misery does, however, love company... this blog proves it.

When I read that, it was the end of Lynnette's brief appearance here.

Lynnette has so much wrong she must be dating Homer.

Thees districts take up a lot of area which was already developed. Every regular yearly property tax increase for every piece of property is diverted away from basic services for decades.

The idea that only tax increases from the new development go to pay back the UR borrowing and spending is a deliberate falsehood. To put it kindly.

District-Created-Acres
Airport Way 1986 2780
Interstate 2000 3744
Central Eastside 1986 681
Convention Center 1989 601
Downtown Waterfront 1974 309
Gateway Regional Center 2001 653
Lents Town Center 1998 2472
North Macadam (SoWa) 1999 409
River District 1998 310
South Park Blocks 1985 161
Wilammette Industrial 2004 751

Lynnette is no doubt a sincere, earnest, recent transplant to Portland, with no monetary or family connections to anyone who's making money off the Portland "urban renewal" juggernaut. She's gone now -- I quickly tired of her critique of this blog, as opposed to the points it makes. Eventually, she'll understand how this place really works. It took me the better part of 20 years. In the meantime, let's all support the emotionally needy souls in their $800K condos.

Did any of you catch the Feb 1 work session of the CoP and PDC regarding the Central Eastside URA? Holy cow, Lynette would have been in heaven. Except for the citizen member who kept saying (parapphrases all) "There are 17,000 jobs here that we don't want you, the City, to f%&k up." Potter said, "Those jobs are going away anyway. We want a sound stage." Sten said, "What if we made it even bolder?" And Saltzman didn't say a word. The PDC guy, I think it was Bruce Warner, but I'm not sure, said, "We need to be able to control what goes in there." And Sam said, "Is $35MM or $51 MM better?" Guess what the PDC reps said?

Oh boy.

The Pearl didn't come about because of a sudden influx of "vision, planning, and patience", it was because of a sudden financial giveaway. And what do you mean a developer couldn't handle that project?

Better than 15 years ago, when I was looking for a home to buy, I approached several building owners in what's now "The Pearl" about buying their falling down, unoccupied warehouse buildings. "Not for sale" I was told, they were waiting (the "patience" part) for the City, for PDC, to step in and "incent" them.

How many times have we heard, in City Council chambers, that you "can't build residential housing downtown without a subsidy?"

The saddest part of PDC's policies (aka "the rest of us subsidizing") is the gross distortion of the market it creates, and the damper it puts on real entreprenurial spirit.

One aspect of the urban renewal grease game I have yet to hear much about is who does the investment banking?

Which firm underwrites the urban renewal bonds, and who buys them?

Whaddya wanna bet that the firm that gets all that business is just another insider?

Anybody know?

Well, there's the "Portland Family of Funds." There's a grease pit.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria DermoÈ—t - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 119
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics