Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 10, 2006 6:06 PM. The previous post in this blog was Ten I admire. The next post in this blog is So go the days of our lives. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Grampy to baseball: Wonderful, thank you, now get lost

Yesterday's visit to Portland by the top brass of the Florida Marlins baseball team rekindled hopes among the city's baseball fanatics that some day a major league team will find its home in the Rose City. Team officials met with the governor and the mayor, and drove around looking at potential sites for a stadium. It's clear that Portland is on a short list of some sort with the team.

But although there were a lot of feel-good sentiments expressed, at the end of the day (literally) the mayor didn't just throw cold water on baseball's prospects here -- it was more like dropping an iceberg onto them. Here's what transpired, according to the O:

[D]uring a meeting with Mayor Tom Potter, the subject of public financing for a baseball stadium -- something Potter strongly opposes -- never came up. Potter reiterated after the meeting that "publicly financed baseball would not be coming to Portland on my watch."
* * * * *

Asked whether most Portlanders couldn't care less about a baseball team, Potter said: "That's my very strong sense."

Potter did not dismiss the idea of economic development that a stadium project might bring, although he said he had no specifics to go by in this case.

Today some of baseball's local backers responded. And although they're smiling through clenched teeth, they're obviously pretty steamed. In a press release (which I am reading second-hand from a trusted source), Drew Mihalic of the Oregon Sports Authority offered these thoughts:

I want to thank Mayor Potter for taking the time to meet, and I want to make clear that I have a great deal of personal and professional respect for him. In fact, as someone with children in Portland Public Schools, and as the leader of an organization that has twice saved PIL spring sports seasons, I share his position that education is an absolute priority for the City of Portland.

Yesterday served as a culmination of many years of hard work and dedication for a countless number of Oregonians who have spent considerable time, passion and energy on the quest to position Portland as a home for Major League Baseball. We were disappointed not to have the opportunity, prior to the Marlins visit, to present to the Mayor the reasons behind our passion for this quest. Hence, we were unable to provide him with a full explanation of how baseball in Portland can happen in a way that makes sense for our City.

While yesterday's visit was a total success in almost all aspects, the one unfortunate result is a headline distributed across the country that reads: "Mayor: Most Portlanders don't care about getting a team." While the Mayor spoke positively in general about the visit, when a reporter asked if he felt Portlanders couldn't care less about baseball, he stated that it is his "very strong sense." Again, we are disappointed not to have had the opportunity to present him with substantial evidence that convincingly demonstrates Portland's profound interest in Major League Baseball....

While the evidence clearly points to a significant level of support for baseball in Portland, we recognize that the Mayor is fully entitled to his opinion. However, if the people of Portland do not share that opinion, we hope they will communicate to the Mayor that they do in fact care about this remarkable opportunity -- in a polite and positive manner. We encourage people to do so at

We know that we must do a better job of communicating to the Mayor that the City can play an appropriate, yet critical role in the financing of a ballpark -- one that meets his stated concerns regarding the protection of Portland taxpayers. I truly, and strongly believe that if the Marlins situation develops as we envision, and the Mayor provides us with the opportunity to sit down and work through these issues in earnest, the end result can be an incredible accomplishment for him, for the City of Portland and for the entire state of Oregon. We sincerely hope that we are afforded that chance.

It doesn't take too much translation to grasp that there's a rift here that's going to be hard to heal. Not encouraging for baseball fans. Not at all.

Comments (33)

I could care less about MLB in PDX. That said, TommyBoy's performance with the Marlin visitors is a true embarrassment for our region. He's a pathetic boor....shoulda been left off the program. Let him wade around the Tryon weed patch....but puh-leeze!....keep him away from honest efforts to bring new life and economic development to Portland. He comes off as totally clueless...inept....repeat: an embarrassment. Lock him in his visioning cell and throw away the key.


MLB is just another scam to line the pockets of private investors with tax money. Additionally, once a huge investment has been made, the team is highly likely to extort other benefits at public cost.

With our civic infrastructure corroding at an unseemly rate, the last thing we need to do with any public money is support any athletic endeavor.

I think Tom did the right thing.


I am a sports fan and a rabid baseball nut, but I am not convinced MLB will bring me a more valuable sports experience than I get watching the Beavers given the extra ticket cost and concession sales. The question I ask is how long will it take for the Marlins to be a good team and is it worth the extra price to "catch" marque players visiting the home team.

That being said, I find Potter's representation of the city very poor and frankly, very elitiest. I get the impression that the Mayor is against MLB because it is too pedestrian for his crowd.

I also have the impression he has not thought through the issue on the level I expect from a mayor of a major city. Regardless of his personal opinion on the value of MLB, the mayor has an obligation to the city to keep an open mind and show some class when a major sports franchaise walks into town to discuss relocating.

On the point that a baseball stadium would be a drain on public resources, I disagree in the sense that the public utility of having a pro stadium would be sufficiently more than virtually every other public project in this city: more of a utility and cheaper than the rim shot, more functional than tax-free condos, have less of an impact on property tax roles than the bloated pension funds, et cetera. It isn't as though the stadium will only be used for MLB.

I've been a baseball fan for 45 years and would love to see a team in Portland. But that said, the city and state have no business financing a stadium.
Most independent studies (ones not financed by teams or by major league baseball) show that financial benefit of a city building a ballpark is negligible.
In San Francisco, voters turned down a number of stadium proposals before the owner actually paid for the stadium himself, showing that it can, indeed, be done.
If the Oregon Stadium Campaign is so fired up about bringing baseball to the area, why doesn't it dig up a prospective owner and some private funding for a stadium?

Spectator sports? Who needs 'em? Solid majorities say they don't care about any current local team, much less the Seattle pro clubs, high-school sports or possible new major sports attractions.

From the recent WW Week Portland survey.

Grampy knows how to count votes. Until the OSA et al can put up (the numbers), they should shut up. No one likes to hear a bunch of whining rich guys. It would seem that Alito should be occupying the PBG President's time these days, not the mayor. But then again, it's all about priorities, isn't it?

Presuming of course that an equal cross-section of the population in Portland reads the WW, not to mention has the inclination to respond to a survey.

Well, while we all might wish that Portland was a little less like the WW's prime demographic, the point is: they read, and they're the ones who vote.

The argument of the stadium backers is "but we've got tv ratings data!" Oooh, big whoop. In a project of this magnitude, in a town like Portland, you've got to have the stones to win an up or down referendum or get a majority of the mayor and commissioners. Attempting to prevail or generate momentum by anything less majoritarian is just wasting everyone's time, and dare I say: bush league.

And can we quit pretending that this is anything but a sandbox for the Big Kids? Specifically, those Big Kids with land interests near the eventual stadium site, PDC ties, or other connections? The position of the vast majority of people who would claim only a psychic benefit from baseball here controls whether or not the Big Kids get to play, not whether Portland becomes "major league". The latter depends on far more than just a baseball team, notably, economic substance beyond watching overpaid millionaires (both on and off the field, if you know what I mean).

If the Mayor's cold water wasn't enough, yesterday's weather surely would have sufficed. That aside, I really can't fault the mayor for opposition in principle to public financing of MLB. We don't need another public money pit, really, do we? And that being the case, what on earth is wrong with hizzoner's forthrightly saying so?

We don't need another public money pit, really, do we?

Like the Public Market?

One might think it crazy, but how I would respond to the Mayor's cold shoulder would be to publically admit that a referendum and/or support of a majority of the mayor or commissioners is going to be required to legitimize this thing, in the eyes of the community AND any MLB team.

Then, if I thought I was close to having enough support and could really sell it to get the last 5-10% or so to get to 50% plus 1, I would announce in the next week or so that Baseball-in-Portland was going balls to the wall and putting an initiative on the November 2006 ballot. Bring it on. I wouldn't be surprised to see a majority of leaders and interests eventually get behind it. Portlanders do want a bigger vision, seem confused on what the Mayor's is, and could perhaps be roped in by such a gutsy move.

If my internal polls (the real ones, not the ones where I asked "would you go to a game?") indicated that baseball truly had nowhere near that support, I would shut up and go home until '08 or 2010, when Portland will have grown a bit more.

That's three - I'm out.

Remember the Delta Dome - long live the Delta Dome!! (of course Portlanders want baseball...they just don't want to pay for it - 45 years running)

We don't need another public money pit, really, do we?

Like the Public Market?

C'mon, Jack. You know there's no place around here where we can find fancy cheese, Oregon wines, and local produce. Government has to step in here to provide this. (Sigh.)

Of course the last "Public Market" helped destroy the already existing food markets downtown. We sure hate to learn from history, don't we?

As much as I disagree with Potter on this issue. I really do think he reflects the mindset of Portland. He also ran his campaign stating "No Public Financing for MLB." So I'm not surprised this has happened.

That said, MLB doesn't have a lot of other great options. They are holding on to DC by a thread. Vegas has way more issues than anyone wants to admit. And San Antonio really hasn't put any type of plan together.

I tend to think the days of publicly funded stadiums are over. If an owner wants to put a team in Portland, he is going to have to shell out a lot of his own cash.

Give the financial uncertainties of this market -- at least as portrayed by the nattering nabobs of negativism on the issue -- I doubt that any ownership group will take any major risk on the real estate aspect. And the Paul Allen situation isn't helping, either.

How many stadiums/arenas does downtown Portland need anyway? Or would the one off Burnside get remodeled yet again?

The old one would continue to be used by the high schools and PSU for a few years, but the condo guys would eventually get their hands on that lot one way or the other.

Please help me understand the public financing part of the stadium plan. As I understand it the "public financing" will come from revenues which come with baseball such as the income tax on players salaries, ticket tax, "enhanced" parking fees and the like. Is the objection to fronting this money? Then let's get the team owner to commit to staying as long as it takes to get the stadium paid off.

Before the condo guys get Civic Stadium they're going to have to get it from The MAC which has first right of refusal if Civic shuts down sports.

Gramps, I voted for you ONLY because of your stand on MLB and I wish you'd reign in any/all of the other Money Pits. That's what you're there for.

Ah ... I mean "rein in".

Don't forget, we already had a full private funding option offered. True there was a significant catch, but seriously, do you doubt that there will be an off-reservation casino in Oregon soon anyway?

I'm as big a baseball fan as any, but for God's sake Portland, don't get caught up in this nonsense. Public stadiums NEVER pay for themselves and never come in on budget. Given that the past few stadiums built around the country cost over $500 million, I gotta guess that a new major league stadium in Portland would be nosing against the $1 billion mark when all is said and done. The famous tram project is just rounding error compared to the cost of a new stadium.

Personally having lived in both Portland and South Florida I can't imagine that Portland is actually a better baseball market. I would be shocked if this wasn't just all a big feint to get more money out of Dade or Broward counties for a new stadium in Florida.

I would be first in line to buy season tix if Portland got a baseball team...but taxpayers shouldn't have to pay for my love of baseball...just like I shouldn't have to pay for other tax payers love of the automobile and driving alone.

There's been a legitimate poll on Baseball?

Has there been any legitimate polls, or public votes, on the Tram, on the Convention Center Hotel, the new Light Rail lines, the Transit Mall, the Burnside Couplet, or the Tryon Creek farm?
Perhaps Mayor Potter will recommend more polling or voting?
He may even want to ask the PDC to produce those State law required yearly Urban Renewal impact reports they don't currently provide.

Anyone curious?

"'We don't need another public money pit, really, do we?'
Like the Public Market?"

Hey, if the city takes over PGE, the "tax" collections from ratepayers could pay for the stadium AND the cheese stall. Not to mention the tr . . . . never mind.

If the Marlins were looking pay their way and invest in Portland like any other corporation, then they would have no real reason to meet the mayor in the first place. And certainly wouldn't need to rely on him to characterize the public sentiment in Portland.

No, if they were looking at Portland as a potential market to invest their own money then they'd be doing their own market studies and talking with real estate interests not political interests.

But if course if the Marlins were simply interested in investing their own money rather than living off the public trough, they'd never in a million years be considering abandoning South Florida for Portland. The only reason they are even considering leaving is because Miami refuses to bribe them with enough public dollars to stay.

South Florida is the 6th largest metro area in the US at 5.07 million people if you include Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties. Portland comes in at #25 with 1.927 million.

Any baseball team that can't figure out how to make money in that market, especially with the obvious ties to Cuba, the Dominican Republic, and the rest of Latin America, has no business even calling itself a business.

No folks, don't be fooled. The Marlins have no real interest in actually moving to Portland. They just want you as leverage to pry more money out of Miami.

Look it. Obviously, the Marlins are just leveraging Portland to get more money from Miami. But so what.

The deal is, what if Miami balks and doesn't give the Marlins money. Then what. Wouldn't you want Portland to be in a position to accept the team?

Portland isn't competing against Miami. If Miami wants the team, they'll get it. Portland is competing with Vegas and San Antonio, and I think we can beat them.


You made my point for me.

But the fact of the matter is that Portland can't WIN this so-called competition.

If the competition is on the merits of the city as a Baseball and media market then South Florida wins hands down. It's not even close.

If the competition is which city can throw the most money at the millionare owners of a baseball team. Then of course the biggest loser in that competition will be the taxpayers of whatever city "wins". And for that matter, Vegas is probably much more likely to throw silly amounts of money at baseball anyway. That's how Vegas does things.

Personally I think San Antonio is much more interested in attracting the Saints. They already have a stadium (Alamo Dome) that can handle a NFL team until the city eventually gets around to building a palace to the Saints. And Texas is really more football country than baseball.

That said, any deal sweet enough to convince the Marlins to move to Portland is simply a deal that you aren't going to want.

Has anyone tried to actually go to a major league baseball game recently? I was in San Diego over the summer--where I grew up--and went to a game at the new Pet-Co park. Our "decent" seats cost something like $38 per ticket, and then we had to either pay $10 for parking or arrive at the light-rail station 2 hours early to make the trip. Hotdogs: $6. Beer: $8. True, nobody was holding a gun to my head, but when you go to a ballgame, you like to kick back with some food and drink. And this was just me and my wife--I'd hate to think of what it would be like with several kids. Time to take out a second mortgage, I guess. We've got too many genuine needs in Portland before we allocate money, time, and land to a playground for a bunch of millionaires.

A baseball team? What we need is decent passenger train service to Seattle. With that, we could give up MLB and our "international" airport too.

Thank you Frank for bringing up the "Yamhill Public Market" a truly forlorn urban development project. The Powers that be can't seem to learn from their mistakes.

p.S. I'm with Tom on this one!

I agree with Mayor Potter. NO public money for baseball.

Well, maybe public money for baseball. But only if the stadium has a strict season ticket holder policy-- only the following people will be eligible to attend games:

-any resident or property owner of any of the PDC's subsidized building projects.

-any OHSU employee, but only if their tram is extended to the new baseball stadium.

-any PDC employee with at least $1000 per month in steak and booze receipts, proof of PDC reimbursement required.

- any Portland City Council candidate who takes public money for their political campaign. (Exception will be made for any incumbent who proves to their Pa that even though they killed the momma bird, they took good care of the baby birds and let them go)

-all residents of Dignity Village and Tyron Creek farm.

The following persons will be ineligible for season tickets for Portland's baseball team:

-all PGE employees

-any Willamette Week writer who received a Pulitzer for killing the goose that laid the golden public trough egg.

-all voters who might vote against the proposed 1% city income tax (we know who you are and where you live).

-Everyone who owns a car.

-Everyone who doesn't own a car, but lusts in their heart for a Hummer)

-anyone who lives east of I-205. (after all, you can't give a season ticket to people who don't exist...)


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics