Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 11, 2006 5:24 PM. The previous post in this blog was Happy Birthday. The next post in this blog is He couldn't stay away. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Film at 11 -- not

Some breaking news in my e-mail inbox:

It's official -- we'll vote on a Portland city income tax in May. The City Council will refer a measure to voters. So says Super Vicki in a press release this afternoon.

Surprise -- Jack Roberts is apparently going to run for Oregon Supreme Court against Virginia Linder. Even though he said he wouldn't might not run against a woman.*

It's over -- the recall campaign against Judge Mary Mertens James, who invalidated Measure 37, has petered out.

We return you now to your regularly scheduled surfing...

* UPDATE, 1/12, 1:00 a.m.: As the exchange in the comments below reveals, Jack Roberts never said that he would not run against a woman. In fact, he said something vaguer than that on the subject. The details are in the comments. Apologies for the confusion.

Comments (23)

Jack, I never said I wouldn't run against a woman. I said that if a woman ran and it looked like she would win if I didn't run then I might not run.

The problem is that Virginia Linder and Eugene Hallman are both running and it is by no means certain that Judge Linder would win even if I didn't run.

I have also heard from a lot of people who believe diversity is about more than gender. We can also use a little diversity in philosophy and life experience. Simply elevating another court of appeals judge (we have five on the Supreme Court already) or a lawyer from the attorney general's office (we have three of those) does not necessarily result in diversity because it is a female rather than a male.

Having said that, I continue to believe Judge Linder is a fine judge and would make a good Supreme Court justice. But I believe the voters should be given a choice. After all, our last two governors had the chance to put a woman on the bench yet their last two appointments went to men.

So just to ask, whats your source for the Jack Roberts news?(other than his implied admittance that he's running up above)

A little bird told me... 8c)

if a woman ran and it looked like she would win if I didn't run then I might not run.

From the interview I was remembering:


I read in the paper that you would consider dropping out if a well-qualified woman were to enter the race?


Those were the words that they used. What I actually told them was, if a really strong woman candidate came in who looked like she had a good chance of winning, I might not run. That would be because then it would be a more contested race… and the problem is, I don’t know who that woman would be, but if there was someone there, then I think it would be a legitimate issue and I’d have to take a look at it.

So I take it Judge Linder either is not "a really strong woman candidate" or does not have "a good chance of winning"?

""""It's over -- the recall campaign against Judge Mary Mertens James, who invalidated Measure 37, has petered out."""""
Petered out?
The way I heard it was SOS Bill Bradbury voided 10,000 valid signatures for not having the intiative number on the pages before they were signed.
Is it all about forgeries or stopping public votes?

Yawn. It's over, Wendy. You spin it however you want.

maybe the people wanting to recall James should recall Bradbury first...

Or... maybe the people wanting to recall her should "recall" the whole judicial system.

According to the Eugene Register-Guard, Steffens and pals say "they wanted to show judges and the government that citizens won't tolerate court rulings that don't conform to the voters' will".

What do we need judges for anyhow? We'll just conduct weekly polls and rule according to whatever direction the political wind is blowing. Constitution, schmonstitution. If the people want it, then it must true, right, and just.

I need to start collecting signatures for a ballot measure requiring the state to give every citizen a five pound box of JaCiva's finest. Anyone who gets in the way of the will (and chocolate lust) of the people be damned.

Okay, Jack, what part of "I might not run" and "I'd have to take a look at it" are you having trouble with? I never said I wouldn't run if a woman ran. I put off making my decision for two months after Judge Linder made her announcement precisely to consider the factors I mentioned.

I think you need to seek elsewhere to find the latest fix to support your cynicism habit. It is precisely this tendency to misrepresent statements and lift them out of context that makes people in the public arena reluctant to speak openly and honestly about their plans and intentions.

this tendency to misrepresent statements and lift them out of context

The material I quoted in the comment above was a direct question, and an answer that you gave, right on point. I hardly "lifted" anything "out of context." It is the full question and answer, and I linked to the full interview.

As for my original post, I am sorry I read your Clintonesque interview answer so carelessly.

I am disturbed that the gender of one's potential opponent plays any role in whether or not one will run for public office.

Ellie, neither I nor Jack Roberts first raised that issue. It was raised by others in two interviews he gave last year. What I addressed here was the consistency of his action now with an answer he gave then.

Of course, that's not exactly what Jack Roberts said over on BlueOregon.

Therefore, if Judge Linder demonstrates the ability to be a strong candidate with a good chance to win, I would be inclined not to make this race. However, Gene Hallman has a head start and a strong organization raising money and getting endorsements for him.

I believe I can overcome this, but Judge Linder needs to demonstrate that she can. I will be watching her campaign to see if she does this before making a final decision as to what I intend to do. In any event, I am encouraged that she is thinking of running and I wish her the best.

So, it appears that Jack's decided that Ginny can't beat Gene Hallman.

[Disclaimer: I'm going to be launching Hallman's website any day now.]

"I think you need to seek elsewhere to find the latest fix to support your cynicism habit. It is precisely this tendency to misrepresent statements and lift them out of context..."

Geez, Jack R., you might want to work on a judicious attitude if you hope to be on the court.

Give the guy a break. It was late at night, and I did misquote him. But it was an accident.

In any event, not an auspicious start to the campaign.

We definitely need judges; I would even be so bold as to say an independent judiciary. But I think there is a real question about whether we have that. I heard Dan Meek say that the Oregon Supreme Court made up facts to side with Bradbury in the Nader election case, and Greg Kafoury say that law clerks in Salem were calling it the Bush v. Gore of Oregon. I think the MM James recall was a bad idea because it distracts attention away from the bigger picture and the real issues. Judges can certainly thwart "the will of the people" to strike down an unconstitutional law. It is MM James' constitutional anaysis that worries me. Also, recall is meant to apply to corrupt, not incompetent judges. We hear the same refrain coming from the O about the Portland police who failed to investigate the second hand store theft ring: they are incompetent, not corrupt. I think , though, that when there is widespread incompetence in high places, corruption lurks somewhere close by.

Cynthia wrote
""""Also, recall is meant to apply to corrupt, not incompetent judges""""""""

If the Oregon Supreme Court throws out all of Judge James' decision points with an opinion that the judge stepped outside the constitution herself.

Incompetence is one thing but suppose Judge James knew exactly what she was doing in stepping outside the constitution. Would that not be a form of corruption?

I am not accusing but simply curious.

Is it not possible for a judge or any public official to deliberately step outside the bounds of their responsibility thereby committing maleficence worthy of recall?

Or is there any level of incompetence that is on par with maleficence?

You should read James' opinion at measure 37 .com. I have been practicing for almost 30 years and it is one of the wackiest rulings i have ever seen. the judge simply makes up the law. any first year law student would find it incredulous. her confusion concerning whether the people can limit the legistature by constitutionally provided public vote is insane. think a minute..what state wide statutory initiative doesn't address or have some effect on the power of the is a STATUTORY must effect the power of the legislature by definition is as if the people in portland vote to overturn the public financing of elections and the city commissioners do it anyway..she completely emasculates the referendum short, it is a fine example of the tyranny or the judiciary that some judges seem to ascribe to..the people do not know what is good for them and i do...what arrogance...with respect to the equal protection argument, the judge either doesn't understand the initiative or needs to take 1st year constitutional law. She basis this ruling upon whacko ruling number 1 and compounds it by not being able to distiguish between those who purchased before the regulation and those who purchased after with knowledge of the limitations on the use of the property.. in summary, this was a hatchet job..done with a blunt edge...

SS and RW: Both of your comments make sense to me. I see it as a hatchet job and over the line in terms of ethics. My disgust is compounded by the fact that MMJ-before her appointment to the bench- allowed herself to be recruited to run Judge Ed Fadeley off the bench. IMHO and the opinion of others of many polictical persuasions, Fadeley was about as independent and competent of a jurist as we have had in the state in recent years. He wasn't subject to political manipulation and, therein, methinks, lies the problem. People ought to be alarmed: I once had a client whose father was from the old Yugoslavia; he said he had lived under some of the most notoriously corrupt regimes on earth and had seen nothing quite like the Oregon court system.In is opinion, Oregon is up there with the worst.

Fadeley was about as independent and competent of a jurist as we have had in the state in recent years.


Steve, My guess is that there is intent for a hatchet job somewhere, probably with the lawyers that influenced James. But it would be hard to prove and a recall campaign just allows people who don't deserve the moral high ground to take it. After all THEY wouldn't interfere with a matter before the court. Yeah?

At least Fadeley, whom I believe was first in his law school class, seemed actually to read the briefs submitted in a case and to make decisions on the merits rather than on the political correctness of the lawyer or the claim.

Sorry for the afterthought: Someone I read recently used the term "Boobris" to refer to those who don't quite merit a finding of hubris. I would apply that to most of the judges on our appellate courts. I wouldn't be so nice to the crowd that controls judicial selection.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
GascĂłn, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria DermoČ—t - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics