Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 5, 2005 7:10 AM. The previous post in this blog was W imie Ojca i Syna i Ducha Swietego. The next post in this blog is Right around the corner. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, December 5, 2005

What to do now about PGE

The latest revelations in the Portland General Electric tax scam are certainly... well, revealing. Now it turns out that PGE collected from ratepayers millions of dollars of Multnomah County taxes that weren't paid to the county -- indeed, they apparently weren't even passed on to PGE's parent company, Enron. According to Willamette Week and City Commissioner Randy Leonard, PGE just kept that money, along with some other types of "taxes" that it charged customers for as well.

A few suggestions here. First, since the city is said to have the power to set electricity rates within its borders, Leonard ought to have someone prepare an ordinance whereby ratepayers in the city get credit for all state and local taxes that the state PUC allows to be billed but unpaid. Pass it now, and see what happens.

Another avenue of attack: The county ought to pass an ordinance that says that PGE's (or its corporate parent's) county taxes are what it normally would owe the county (apparently, nothing, under current rules), or the amount of county taxes that it collects from its customers, whichever is greater. If PGE collects, it has to pay. There's another one you could pass next week.

Finally, the city ought to be readying another PUD campaign, along the lines that I've suggested here previously. I've never been a fan of the many PUD measures put up by the usual hippie suspects, but if it were done right, I could vote for public power. On this one, unlike so many issues in Portland, I'll take socialism over corruption.

Of course, all these moves would also impact Pacific Power, which is about to be taken over by Warren Buffett. They haven't been such bad apples, but it appears they're in a barrel with a wormy one.

Be prepared, of course, to see PGE (and maybe even Pacific Power) move its headquarters out of downtown. PGE's probably already planning to do that. Perhaps they could locate out by the new Trib offices, or take up the space in Hillsboro that OHSU threatened to run to if we didn't build it an aerial tram [rim shot]. Heck, Dave Lister may even have a spot for PGE near his new place out by Mattress World.

Comments (38)

Speaking of tax freeloaders, how about we figure out some way to tax those million dollar Pearl District condos that only pay $147/year?

How about a basic services tax that allows a 100% credit for property tax actually paid?


Myabe we should do a poll and ask the public to vote on their top choice out of say, five potential new PGE locations. Make sure to include "the doghouse".

And on another note, I can't believe that you of all people could assume that a City-run PUD would be corruption free. Well, actually that's a bit extreme - but for me - I'd prefer to limit the city to just running the CITY, and see if we can get that dialed before we hand them our electricity as well.

As I said, I'd be for it if it's done right. That's a big "if."

Under what sort of view is electricity and the associated infrastructure not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is natural gas and the associated infrastructure not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view are condos and the associated tax subsidies not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is Walmart and the associated products, employees and customers not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is Trammel Crow and tax abatements not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is crime and the lack of jail space not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is commerce choking congestion the associated costs not a part of "the City"?

Under what sort of view is 20 years of planning and the associated lack of infrastructure not a part of "the City"?

How about one more attack: defeat PGE's cynical attempt to retain undue influence over our elections by defeating (or better yet, not letting on the ballot) the repeal of Voter Owned Elections?

How about one more attack: defeat PGE's cynical attempt to retain undue influence over our elections by defeating (or better yet, not letting on the ballot) the repeal of Voter Owned Elections?

Sorry, comrade. I wouldn't go that far.

Do any PearlCondoItes pay property taxes?

The vast majority of condo owners in newly constructed buildings pay full property taxes. At the Street Car Lofts, NW 12th @ Lovejoy, about 125 of 135 units pay full property taxes. I own one of them. Last month I paid $2,282 in property taxes for a 610 square feet condo. The building owners pay over $500,000 per year in property taxes.

If you see a pile driver followed by a tower crane, the new condominium building will be on the tax rolls.

If you see a rehab of an existing historic structure, into condominiums, you will often see 10 years of tax abatement.

Facts spoil the Broad Brush of Fiction

Steve Schopp,
You overlooked (among other things) police, fire, water, sewer, sidewalks, parks and streets!


Bummer. Sounds like you picked the wrong condo.

The father of a close friend of mine bought a nice new condo in the Henry building last year for just North of $800k. His property taxes were about $200/yr and will be for the next 9 years.

Prior to buying the condo, he sold his house up by OHSU; he was paying more than $10,000 per year in property taxes on it.

Chris Smith advises,
""""(or better yet, not letting on the ballot)""""

You're an authority on that. No voting.

We can't have the public voting.

Not on the Tram. $50 million.
Not on light rail. $ Billions
Not on the transit mall. $150 million
Not on the CC Hotel. $140 million
Not on the Burnside-Couch realignment.$50 million
Or anything else 'you' want.

Your transportation planning cabal sure is busy
spinning the cost of the congestion you cause.

All we need is more of the same rail and bike nonsense right?
And you're all for the Tram.


You overlooked (among other things) schools.

Steve overlooked streets??? Who needs streets? Why we've got a world-class mass transit system that just sparkles with efficiency.

Not to mention bike lanes where nobody wants to bike, no bike lanes where (seemingly) everybody wants to bike and bicyclists who don't give a s**t about anyone else on the road (see NW Skyline, among others).

What about trying to do one (or a few) thing(s) right instead of screwing around with fifty and doing none of them well.

Of course if, under your "view", growing city government and spending ever-increasing amounts of money are legitimate functions, these things the "City" does extremely well.

On KXL's Crossfire with Larry George and Randy Leonard.

When caller radio host Lars Larson asked City Commissioner Randy Leonard, on the air, if he would attend the cross raising in Pioneer Courthouse Square, Leonard replied with,

"If you'll be driving a cross through the chest of George Bush I'll be there."

This sound bite should be replayed for people to hear and know the hatred Leonard and others harbor.

Wow, Paul M., that sure did help my understanding of this debate over PGE!


Pardon me for correcting an inaccuracy, but the public DID get to vote on light rail. We turned it down twice.

While we're on the subject of Commissioner Leonard, is anyone else concerned about an elected official who publically accuses a business of criminal behavior (from the Oregonian: "It could be a criminal conspiracy; it could be a criminal act"), not merely negligence or other bad acts, but a crime, prior to any such finding by a court, grand jury or anyone else involved in the criminal justice system?

I think all the "crime" talk is overheated, but certainly it's appropriate for a public official to ask for an investigation. Getting someone from the dynamic trio of Mike Schrunk, Hardy Myers and Karin Immergut to actually do something about anything is quite the challenge, however.

Fireman Randy ought to get to work on a rate ordinance instead. That will hit them harder than all his quotes from "Law and Order."

Please look at to find out what a typical Henry condo owner actually pays in property taxes. Unit 1413 by example was assessed $256.62 in property taxes in 2004, similar to your acquaintance. However in 2005 this unit was assessed $17,079.48 in property taxes.

The url for this unit is:

Just the Facts Madam


Speaking of fast ones pulled off by Big Business and Governments, what about Multnomah County making me pay taxes to BUILD AND OPERATE the Wapato Jail but then using the operations money for every else but operating it....

Guisto made a half hearted attempt to expose this little scam but the Oregonian never bit... only saw a brief story on it on Channel 12 about a week ago.

I want my taxes back!

FreeJack, Love your last statement "Facts Spoil the Broad Brush of Fiction" I think this applies to the latest "scandal" with PGE.

Does anybody think so many millions could really be diverted to profits of a business so scrutinized over the past years? And one that just weathered a presumably competent due dilligence process by the City?

This story sounds to me like a practice exercised by the Bush administration - find any data that supports your agenda. Pubic power/private power - they both can work well for consumers. If you have a position either way, develop a good arguement people with an opposing position can respect.

Bravo to our hero reporters who uncover the dirty and incompetent work of business and politics alike. But shame to those who publish garbage to achieve an agenda or sell newsprint.

Dig further. We will find that a few facts ineptly (I might even say, maliciously) reported by the media do not support a truth.

Jay wrote,
""""Steve, Pardon me for correcting an inaccuracy, but the public DID get to vote on light rail. We turned it down twice.""""""""

Right you are, but that was ancient history when we were allowed to vote. Since then the PDC,Metro,TriMet and Port figured out how to avoid votes and build light rail against the public.

Much ado about nothing. PGE delivers electricity at a reasonable rate. And they do it reliably, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, rain, snow, ice, wind, etc., etc. Compare what PGE delievers to anything the City of Portland delievers --the city that works-- and you'll be crying a river. Oh yeah, scour through PGE's books and find some errors. Big deal. Why not go through your own checkbooks and you'll find errors here and there too. But if truly want to find some genuinely egreguious misuse of public monies of far greater proportions than anything at PGE, go through SAIF's books, or go through OHSU's books, or, while we are talking about them, through the City of Portland's books. Governmental financial fraud and waste dwarfs anything PGE may do.

Well, let's just pass some ordinances saying that when they make an "error," it has to be corrected in favor of the people who covered their overdraft.

It would be rather interesting to perform a 10-15 year historic study on the ability of a utility like NWN, PGE or PPL that supplies essential services to the region, and the ability of the city or local government to manage the same costs.

I'm no financial genius but in the words of Randy Leonard, "It's not THAT complicated. I've been paying PGE bills and local taxes since 1976. Over the long haul, I remain more impressed with the ability of the people at the electric company to manage costs than the people that have been running my government. But Randy, I appreciate any effort to make all my service providers more accountable, but please don't pretend that our tax laws are not screwed up and complicated and don't lose perspective. If PGE made some honest or dishonest mistakes they will surely be required to make it good. And another note to Randy if he reads this blog: I voted for you to make the CITY more accountable - not the local utilities.

Dear Commissioner Leonard: I see "criminal" behavior in $20 million worth of Water/Sewer software that got tossed in the trash bin. Did anybody at the City lose their job? Did anybody get demoted for picking an inept vendor or failing to implement the program? How did so many other cities manage to successfully implement software from the same vendor? What makes Portland different?

What about a $60 million jail that got built, but was never opened. Did a single bureaucrat or elected official suffer a layoff or demotion?

How can we spend $2 million to 'consider' a PGE takeover when Beirut, Lebanon has better arterials than Naito Parkway or the majority of Portland's ("sand & gravel") neighborhoods?

If your car is stolen, they'll take that report over the phone. If you're house is ripped off, well, you might want to start cruising the local pawn shops. But let Portland P.D. cooperate with the JTTF and the FBI: HELL NO! Because they won't agree to grant the Mayor and the City Auditor "Top Secret" security clearances. Sheeesh.

Our infrastructure is literally crumbling beneath our feet, but the City of Portland has an extra $2 million/year for "Clean Elections" (as opposed to the formerly "Dirty Elections" that ushered in current leadership)? That's criminal.

In my considered opinion, our city and county leaders have sh*t in their proverbial mess kits. Both the previously ambivalent and the steadfastly liberal are beginning to notice the foul odor in the air. Business as usual is not going meet with the same success it has in the past. Ask Neil or Mo Cheeks: smile and wave doesn't work like it used to...winning their hearts and minds might get you reelected, but it won't address our most urgent challenges. Political courage means doing the right thing, even if it alienates your core constituency.

If you're not pissed off, you're not paying attention.

The issue is not poor PGE management or complicated tax laws regarding PGE.

The issue is PGE's cynical manipulation of PUC rules, state law and the tax code.

In fact, PGE spends a lot of money creating political and community support that will say white is black, and day is night, just as some of the comments above me here seem to be arguing.

People can call PGE's $1 billion "overcharge" an honest mistake if they like, but that isn't going to cut it. Neither are “red herrings”.

We now know that at virtually the same time Enron traders were involved in fraudulently trading energy out of PGE offices in downtown Portland, PGE Execs were attributing an inflated amount of those profits to be subject to the Mult County Business Tax they were collecting from ratepayers and then keeping the money and not paying the tax.

In a meeting I had with top PGE execs this past Friday, they conceded that they were going to pay at least some of that money back….unilaterally.

Hmmm. Because they are altruistic members of our community who want to do the right thing? Or because of the pressure brought on by a law suit on this subject by local attorney Dan Meek and new, intense pressure now being applied by the city on this specific series of transactions?

I will let Jack’s readers answer that one.

Time will tell how this plays out. But I would not be too hasty in making excuses for and/or sticking up for the PGE Execs just yet. Believe me, they know what they are doing.

Although we are in un-chartered waters in terms of a city using it’s statutory rate making authority, the city is being very deliberate in putting together a case that will culminate in a rate making hearing some time next year.

This process will be fair. However, it will also be very thorough.

This is far from over.

The Fireman's silence is deafening. Not one word in response to the previous skeptical entries, six of them by my count. All Republican Moles, no doubt.

The City of Portland is hot on the trail of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse at PGE. Never mind that the Public Utility Commission has jurisdiction over this matter. Never mind the appearance of "sour grapes" after the City's failed attempt to acquire PGE. Never mind boys and girls, because Fireman Randy is looking to harpoon his first whale.

As for the pursuit of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse inside City and County Government? Nada. On the disconnect between citizen's expectations and the City's ability to meet them: zilch. Hoping for a rebuttal on the Council's inability to prioritize public safety ahead of political correctness. Nope: not gonna do it. Wouldn' be prudent. Nothing but pain and self doubt down that rutted road. The Fireman has been there, and he's done that. Nothing but red herrings swimming in those seas, and he's looking for that Devil Whale.

The Fireman's zeal for accountability can only be unleashed on his political enemies, and PGE is at the top of the list. The Condo Class and public employee unions have nothing to worry about. Thar she blows!

Let's see, an anonymous ad hominem attack at 3:30 in the morning. Why am I not paying attention?

Jack? You don't like my contribution? So sad. Why not follow the BlueOregon example and simply delete the comments you find offensive. Or you could ban the IP's of those who frequently disagree with your perspective. We'll call it modified free speech, or free speech for dummies, or Happy Thoughts with Jack Bog.

Ad Hominem: marked by an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made.

I am not attacking Randy's character. He is a politician: he exists to get re-elected. That requires little or no character.

My 3:30 a.m. observation list several examples of Waste, Fraud, and Abuse within the jurisdiction of the City Council. I'm not saying they are all Randy's fault; rather, I believe there frequency and magnitude should diminish the time and energy they expend on investigating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse outside their jurisdiction. Get your own house in order, so to speak.

If the City Council is going to solve regional or State of Oregon problems, why don't they persuade their own employees unions to embrace real PERS reform? Maybe they could outsource some road repair projects where the private sector can complete the task better/faster/cheaper. I see Randy as a gutsy political force that is willing to think outside the box. I simply think he has no business outside PGE's box. When elected officials threaten to foreclose on any property owner or business, but are ultimately deterred by the owner/business, there are bound to be some hard feelings. That's human nature, not an ad-hominem attack. If they weren't going after tax-fraud allegations, I have no doubt the City would have found some other alleged failing to soothe the pain of acquisition failure.

For what it's worth, Commissioner Leonard's response doesn't make me any less concerned about his use of words like "criminal" and "conspiracy" against a business that's been part of the Portland community for a long, long time. He has every right (and in fact the obligation) to insist that the law is enforced fairly and correctly. As a high-ranking official in city government, however, he should not be accusing people of criminal behavior unless it's been proven that that has occurred (which, I have to admit, I strongly doubt). The city can spend millions on trying to attract businesses to the area, but thoughtless remarks (or, if they're not thoughtless remarks, then from a civil liberties perspective, they really are frightening remarks)like Commissioner Leonard's will do just as much to tell businesses that the City of Portland is not a good place to open up shop. How about a new slogan for the city: "Portland: If the city authorities disagree with you, they'll accuse you of being "criminals" here."

Bob Wiggins

Bob Wiggins,
I think you have it backwards. Criminal justice starts with accusations and proceeds from there to proof. It's not the other way round. You shoud know better!
Allan L.

And I should proofread.

For Bob W.:

Imagine that I sent Jack here a fake bill through the mail every month claiming to collect an Oxygen Tax, and he paid me hundreds of dollars over the course of a few years. Later he discovers that he received nothing in return for his payment (because there is no city Oxygen Bureau), or that the bill was completely bogus to start with (because oxygen is freely available).

Would Jack be wrong to suspect criminal activity? Would Jack be wrong to write here that he could have been the victim of a criminal act? Would Jack be wrong to report my behavior to the Postmaster General as possible criminal activity propagated through the U.S. Mail? Indeed, would the Postmaster General be wrong to think he had probable cause to investigate and prosecute my behavior as a federal felony? (Especially once he discovered that I sent similar bills to thousands of other people!)

No. That would be... I dunno, let's call it truthful. It is suspicious, and it does seem like there could be criminal activity at work.

So no, I'm not real concerned over Mr. Leonard (or any other elected official) saying that there "could be a criminal act" under the current similar circumstances. It might be a premeditated swindle or it might be a negligent swindle, but surely there oughtta be a law against such behavior.

(Of course, if I pulled such a scam I'd be going to court and sent to federal-pound-you-in-the-%#@ prison... but a big corporation would probably just pay a fine while admitting no wrongdoing.)

Hi Allen and Alan,

It's one thing for Jack or some other blogger to accuse people of being "criminals". Commissioner Leonard isn't just some goofball (no offense Jack) ranting on a blog. He's a high-ranking city official. When he says someone is a "criminal", it presumably carries some weight. You may or may not remember when Richard Nixon said he thought Charles Manson was guilty; he got a lot of well-deserved grief for it (even though Manson was of course guilty). We have courts to determine these things, not Commissioner Leonard, or Richard Nixon or Maxine Waters or Joe McCarthy. And the place to determine these things is in court, not the Oregonian. If Commissioner Leonard believes PGE committed a criminal offense, he should refer it to the DA or the AG and let justice take its course. He serves in a legislative (and to an extent administrative) role, but he's not part of the justice syatem. It's become way to easy for politicos to call citizens criminals in the papers, screw up their reputations, and drive on to the next assassination. If PGE or its employees is ultimately determined to have committed a criminal act on this issue (which I very strongly doubt), I'll swallow my words. If they aren't, I'm wondering about what kind of apology they'll get from Commissioner Leonard.

There, that's my opinion on the subject. It's worth every penny you paid for it.


Point taken, Bob. But according to your quote, Mr. Leonard did not make a statement saying that a crime was committed, but said that a crime may have been committed. There's a vast difference between the two.

Had he said something definite, such as "those guys are crooks", I'd be right there with ya. That's not the sort of thing anyone should say seriously before a jury speaks. But he said something speculative. You're focusing on his use of the word "criminal", but he used the word in a frankly speculative way. Elected official or not, it's reasonable to make speculative or conditional statements about appearances before all the facts are in.

In fact, I'd say it's far better to be frank about speculation than to be silent about such a thing or to indulge in false certainty. Something like "Simply stated, there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." can cause no end of trouble. Mr. Cheney would have been wiser to be upfront about his speculation, as Mr. Leonard was.

Is there a remote chance of lawyer penance here?

The Florida law firm noted here had previously been hired to force/guide the city purchase of PGE, not withstanding clear legal obstacles.

The OIC, on behalf of PERS, was trying to get PGE to resell it to a "strategic" buyer. Strategic could surely include the option of gaming the taxes. Sure, the OIC may have been a partial beneficiary but they would have shared the take with other state treasurers and their pension trust funds, via TPG. The point here is that the tax anomaly must surely have been known to certain instrumental folks beyond a reasonable doubt.

The unremitted taxes, like magic, is close to the savings the city had hoped to obtain through a purchase.

It looks like a lawyer or two flipped sides, even if under compulsion. No harm no foul? Is that the standard? For lawyers.

How about the misappropriation of tax money that was intended to fund the city's operation, but has been diverted to fund local politicians yard signs and attack ads? That strikes me as criminal. Maybe the next time you dial 911, you'll be put on hold for 6 or 7 minutes: that seems criminal to me.

For $3.4 million per election cycle, I would imagine that a few "Downtown Clean and Safe" officers could work past 11:00 p.m. (recognizing the street urchins are just getting warmed up about then).

Hey, I've got an idea: how about we spend any "windfall" taxes from PGE on public safety, instead of public transit? That would be cool.

Maybe this is why PGE's rates are too high? Maybe those pesky salmon are ENRON moles...

Fish programs add to BPA power bills

Wildlife programs, mostly salmon recovery, account for about a third of the cost of wholesale electricity from Bonneville Power Administration dams and tack on about $10 a month to a monthly household bill, the BPA says.

The agency says the government spends more to offset the harm dams do to salmon than it does on running the dams.But fish or no fish, BPA power is cheaper than most electricity.


09:23 AM PST on Monday, December 12, 2005
Associated Press


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
GascĂłn, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria DermoČ—t - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics