This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 13, 2005 3:50 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Buck-a-Hit Day tomorrow.
The next post in this blog is Off the hook.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
I see that the "negotiations" about who's going to pay the latest (but surely not the last) cost overrun on the OHSU Medical Group aerial tram [rim shot] are going hot and heavy. At last report, somebody needed to come up with $5 million quick. So far it looks like $3.5 mil more is going to come out of property taxes. Great.
Plus, we're still "negotiating" more goodies for fat cat docs and Cali transplants. You normal folks better go light on the stocking stuffers this year.
Comments (11)
Should I wait for others to start the back and forth on the nature of these "property taxes" or should I just start it myself?
Nah, I'll wait and see who knows what, who claims what, who doesn't know anything, and/or who conflates different issues.
I think everyone knows what a property tax is. If you'd like to spend the 200 words typically used to put the City Hall spin on that concept when property tax dollars are being spent to benefit only a small special interest, feel free.
It just isn't the property taxes that these bonds are usually paid from. Its the fact that the bonds are siphoning directly from schools.
It would be one thing if it was the total general fund. But when you claim to put schools forward as your #1 priority it acutally should be. Just about every Dem in Portland who runs for the legislature including Burdick do this.
Instead they allow Portland's URA's to become the number one priority for these tax revenues as some of the highest value property pays for infrastructure monuments built to politicians and institutions.
Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.
On to something on-topic. The last funding plan that has been publicly distributed is from 10/2004. In the 1+ year that has passed, we've seen hit with an aerial tram [... rim shot ...] bill that's 3x higher than projected and a payment for for Boondoggle Park that's 50% more than projected.
I have a feeling that the greenway is going to get a little smaller and we can forget about any improved road access ...
But, don't worry. I'm sure Tram Adams and Segway Williams will find a "solution" that won't hurt taxpayers "too" much.
Property taxes; benefit for the few???
I came a little late to this tram [rim shot] party, but did any of the parties ever discuss whether this should have been appropriately been paid for by special assessment on SoWhat and OHSU? Or whether the invasion of air space should require payment under the concept of eminent domain or inverse condemnation as a governmental taking?
Wine wrote
""""Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.""""
That's what I was waiting for.
The big lie.
With some 70 UR districts across the State, Portland having 11 covering 12000 acres,
the so called "replacement" is pure fraud.
The collective impact of UR is an overall reduction of school funding Statewide.
No ifs, ands or "actuallys" about it.
State law requires annual impact reports but Portland refuses to comply.
The string of lies ushering along Urban Renewal
also tells the public the UR funding only comes from the development which would not otherwise occur.
Every district includes large tracts of land already developed and skims every property tax increase on those properties for at least 20 years.
In addition it diverts all property tax dollars from every new building or home regardless if it was spurred by the Urban Renewal.
And on top of that every UR district is passed off as the ONLY way for ANY development to happen within the target parcels.
Urban Renewal has become the cash cow for dishonest planners and city officials.
Allowing them to spend huge sums while neglecting basic services and core infrastructure.
I see a lot of references on this site to an allegation that the Pearl District and other downtown condo towers are doing nothing but attracting more Californians to the area.
I can't find a reference to it now on the web, but I recently read an analysis of where all those new downtown residents came from, and only 10-20% were transplanted Californians like Nicholas Cage's mother, or whoever.
Anyone else see the same article? Does anyone remember where it came from?
I dont care if they are from Calif or not...what burns me is that some of the richest people in the city are buying million-dollar condos and paying miniscule property taxes.
(less than $200 per year for condos that range from $800k to over $2 million? Please...)
But education is #1 to these idiots...yeah, the education we are getting as taxpayers in this city.
Well, I just came fresh from the OHSU presentation to its employees on the OHSU recent construction projects, including the tram [rimshot].
Since the tram [rimshot] is being jointly funded, it cannot be typified as being for the purpose of health care. Instead, it seems that it is pimped as a "transportation project". This is most interesting to me, as the original land deed to the state of Oregon by the heirs of Sam Jackson came with the stipulation that the land known as "Sam Jackson Park", upon which the hospital, dental school, Hatfield Research Center, and Casey Eye Institute are located, must be used for health care, or the property is to revert the the heirs of the family. The tram [rimshot] looks to be a violation of that stipulation upon the deed.
I certainly don't have enough information to make a clear determination, but it looks as though OHSU could lose possession of the land much of the institution sits upon by building the tram with the help of the city. (Noting here that if they built it and paid for it themselves, and limited it's use to OHSU staff and patients, then there would be no conflict with the stipulations upon the deed gifted to the state by the Jackson family.)
Also, I noted that there was minimal discussion of the capital costs of the tram, but one attendee did ask how much the estimated operational costs of the tram [rimshot] would be. The answer: Estimated at $900,000 per year.
At that rate, with the $45 million (soon to be more) construction cost, Jack's suggestion of a fleet of stretch limos has obvious cost benefits over the tram [rimshot]. Plus, although most OHSU employees will ride at no additional cost, non-employees (like all those visitors they are expecting) will be expected to pay a rider fee expected to be similar to a single bus ride.
Also, in the current configuration of the land in the entire SoWhat project, OHSU owns only four square blocks. I guess most of the tif funds will come from those Californicators who buy into the condo towers to the south of the OHSU SoWhat campus. It's a nice touch for OHSU, I'd say.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (11)
Should I wait for others to start the back and forth on the nature of these "property taxes" or should I just start it myself?
Nah, I'll wait and see who knows what, who claims what, who doesn't know anything, and/or who conflates different issues.
Posted by The One True b!X | December 13, 2005 4:50 PM
I have to reserve my comments until Bill McDonald's column on the Arial tram project runs in this Thursday's edition.
Wes Wagner
NW Meridian
Posted by Wes Wagner | December 13, 2005 5:07 PM
the nature of these "property taxes"
I think everyone knows what a property tax is. If you'd like to spend the 200 words typically used to put the City Hall spin on that concept when property tax dollars are being spent to benefit only a small special interest, feel free.
Posted by Jack Bog | December 13, 2005 5:45 PM
It just isn't the property taxes that these bonds are usually paid from. Its the fact that the bonds are siphoning directly from schools.
It would be one thing if it was the total general fund. But when you claim to put schools forward as your #1 priority it acutally should be. Just about every Dem in Portland who runs for the legislature including Burdick do this.
Instead they allow Portland's URA's to become the number one priority for these tax revenues as some of the highest value property pays for infrastructure monuments built to politicians and institutions.
Posted by DarePDX | December 13, 2005 11:15 PM
Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.
On to something on-topic. The last funding plan that has been publicly distributed is from 10/2004. In the 1+ year that has passed, we've seen hit with an aerial tram [... rim shot ...] bill that's 3x higher than projected and a payment for for Boondoggle Park that's 50% more than projected.
I have a feeling that the greenway is going to get a little smaller and we can forget about any improved road access ...
But, don't worry. I'm sure Tram Adams and Segway Williams will find a "solution" that won't hurt taxpayers "too" much.
Posted by Garage Wine | December 14, 2005 8:43 AM
Property taxes; benefit for the few???
I came a little late to this tram [rim shot] party, but did any of the parties ever discuss whether this should have been appropriately been paid for by special assessment on SoWhat and OHSU? Or whether the invasion of air space should require payment under the concept of eminent domain or inverse condemnation as a governmental taking?
Posted by Jud | December 14, 2005 9:12 AM
Wine wrote
""""Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.""""
That's what I was waiting for.
The big lie.
With some 70 UR districts across the State, Portland having 11 covering 12000 acres,
the so called "replacement" is pure fraud.
The collective impact of UR is an overall reduction of school funding Statewide.
No ifs, ands or "actuallys" about it.
State law requires annual impact reports but Portland refuses to comply.
The string of lies ushering along Urban Renewal
also tells the public the UR funding only comes from the development which would not otherwise occur.
Every district includes large tracts of land already developed and skims every property tax increase on those properties for at least 20 years.
In addition it diverts all property tax dollars from every new building or home regardless if it was spurred by the Urban Renewal.
And on top of that every UR district is passed off as the ONLY way for ANY development to happen within the target parcels.
Urban Renewal has become the cash cow for dishonest planners and city officials.
Allowing them to spend huge sums while neglecting basic services and core infrastructure.
Posted by Steve Schopp | December 14, 2005 9:59 AM
I see a lot of references on this site to an allegation that the Pearl District and other downtown condo towers are doing nothing but attracting more Californians to the area.
I can't find a reference to it now on the web, but I recently read an analysis of where all those new downtown residents came from, and only 10-20% were transplanted Californians like Nicholas Cage's mother, or whoever.
Anyone else see the same article? Does anyone remember where it came from?
Posted by Ernie | December 14, 2005 10:33 AM
I dont care if they are from Calif or not...what burns me is that some of the richest people in the city are buying million-dollar condos and paying miniscule property taxes.
(less than $200 per year for condos that range from $800k to over $2 million? Please...)
But education is #1 to these idiots...yeah, the education we are getting as taxpayers in this city.
Posted by Jon | December 14, 2005 1:00 PM
Well, I just came fresh from the OHSU presentation to its employees on the OHSU recent construction projects, including the tram [rimshot].
Since the tram [rimshot] is being jointly funded, it cannot be typified as being for the purpose of health care. Instead, it seems that it is pimped as a "transportation project". This is most interesting to me, as the original land deed to the state of Oregon by the heirs of Sam Jackson came with the stipulation that the land known as "Sam Jackson Park", upon which the hospital, dental school, Hatfield Research Center, and Casey Eye Institute are located, must be used for health care, or the property is to revert the the heirs of the family. The tram [rimshot] looks to be a violation of that stipulation upon the deed.
I certainly don't have enough information to make a clear determination, but it looks as though OHSU could lose possession of the land much of the institution sits upon by building the tram with the help of the city. (Noting here that if they built it and paid for it themselves, and limited it's use to OHSU staff and patients, then there would be no conflict with the stipulations upon the deed gifted to the state by the Jackson family.)
Also, I noted that there was minimal discussion of the capital costs of the tram, but one attendee did ask how much the estimated operational costs of the tram [rimshot] would be. The answer: Estimated at $900,000 per year.
At that rate, with the $45 million (soon to be more) construction cost, Jack's suggestion of a fleet of stretch limos has obvious cost benefits over the tram [rimshot]. Plus, although most OHSU employees will ride at no additional cost, non-employees (like all those visitors they are expecting) will be expected to pay a rider fee expected to be similar to a single bus ride.
Also, in the current configuration of the land in the entire SoWhat project, OHSU owns only four square blocks. I guess most of the tif funds will come from those Californicators who buy into the condo towers to the south of the OHSU SoWhat campus. It's a nice touch for OHSU, I'd say.
Posted by godfrey | December 14, 2005 1:45 PM
If the City of Portland can fund a tram, why not build and operate their own jail. Oh, that's right, the county does jails.
How about a jail tram?
Posted by Shades of Gray | December 14, 2005 3:26 PM