

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (11)
Should I wait for others to start the back and forth on the nature of these "property taxes" or should I just start it myself?
Nah, I'll wait and see who knows what, who claims what, who doesn't know anything, and/or who conflates different issues.
Posted by The One True b!X | December 13, 2005 4:50 PM
I have to reserve my comments until Bill McDonald's column on the Arial tram project runs in this Thursday's edition.
Wes Wagner
NW Meridian
Posted by Wes Wagner | December 13, 2005 5:07 PM
the nature of these "property taxes"
I think everyone knows what a property tax is. If you'd like to spend the 200 words typically used to put the City Hall spin on that concept when property tax dollars are being spent to benefit only a small special interest, feel free.
Posted by Jack Bog | December 13, 2005 5:45 PM
It just isn't the property taxes that these bonds are usually paid from. Its the fact that the bonds are siphoning directly from schools.
It would be one thing if it was the total general fund. But when you claim to put schools forward as your #1 priority it acutally should be. Just about every Dem in Portland who runs for the legislature including Burdick do this.
Instead they allow Portland's URA's to become the number one priority for these tax revenues as some of the highest value property pays for infrastructure monuments built to politicians and institutions.
Posted by DarePDX | December 13, 2005 11:15 PM
Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.
On to something on-topic. The last funding plan that has been publicly distributed is from 10/2004. In the 1+ year that has passed, we've seen hit with an aerial tram [... rim shot ...] bill that's 3x higher than projected and a payment for for Boondoggle Park that's 50% more than projected.
I have a feeling that the greenway is going to get a little smaller and we can forget about any improved road access ...
But, don't worry. I'm sure Tram Adams and Segway Williams will find a "solution" that won't hurt taxpayers "too" much.
Posted by Garage Wine | December 14, 2005 8:43 AM
Property taxes; benefit for the few???
I came a little late to this tram [rim shot] party, but did any of the parties ever discuss whether this should have been appropriately been paid for by special assessment on SoWhat and OHSU? Or whether the invasion of air space should require payment under the concept of eminent domain or inverse condemnation as a governmental taking?
Posted by Jud | December 14, 2005 9:12 AM
Wine wrote
""""Actually, schools don't directly lose b/c of urban renewal. Equalization (i.e., diversion of income taxes) ensures that any property tax dollars p---ed away on (e.g.) urban renewal get replaced by income tax revenues from the state.""""
That's what I was waiting for.
The big lie.
With some 70 UR districts across the State, Portland having 11 covering 12000 acres,
the so called "replacement" is pure fraud.
The collective impact of UR is an overall reduction of school funding Statewide.
No ifs, ands or "actuallys" about it.
State law requires annual impact reports but Portland refuses to comply.
The string of lies ushering along Urban Renewal
also tells the public the UR funding only comes from the development which would not otherwise occur.
Every district includes large tracts of land already developed and skims every property tax increase on those properties for at least 20 years.
In addition it diverts all property tax dollars from every new building or home regardless if it was spurred by the Urban Renewal.
And on top of that every UR district is passed off as the ONLY way for ANY development to happen within the target parcels.
Urban Renewal has become the cash cow for dishonest planners and city officials.
Allowing them to spend huge sums while neglecting basic services and core infrastructure.
Posted by Steve Schopp | December 14, 2005 9:59 AM
I see a lot of references on this site to an allegation that the Pearl District and other downtown condo towers are doing nothing but attracting more Californians to the area.
I can't find a reference to it now on the web, but I recently read an analysis of where all those new downtown residents came from, and only 10-20% were transplanted Californians like Nicholas Cage's mother, or whoever.
Anyone else see the same article? Does anyone remember where it came from?
Posted by Ernie | December 14, 2005 10:33 AM
I dont care if they are from Calif or not...what burns me is that some of the richest people in the city are buying million-dollar condos and paying miniscule property taxes.
(less than $200 per year for condos that range from $800k to over $2 million? Please...)
But education is #1 to these idiots...yeah, the education we are getting as taxpayers in this city.
Posted by Jon | December 14, 2005 1:00 PM
Well, I just came fresh from the OHSU presentation to its employees on the OHSU recent construction projects, including the tram [rimshot].
Since the tram [rimshot] is being jointly funded, it cannot be typified as being for the purpose of health care. Instead, it seems that it is pimped as a "transportation project". This is most interesting to me, as the original land deed to the state of Oregon by the heirs of Sam Jackson came with the stipulation that the land known as "Sam Jackson Park", upon which the hospital, dental school, Hatfield Research Center, and Casey Eye Institute are located, must be used for health care, or the property is to revert the the heirs of the family. The tram [rimshot] looks to be a violation of that stipulation upon the deed.
I certainly don't have enough information to make a clear determination, but it looks as though OHSU could lose possession of the land much of the institution sits upon by building the tram with the help of the city. (Noting here that if they built it and paid for it themselves, and limited it's use to OHSU staff and patients, then there would be no conflict with the stipulations upon the deed gifted to the state by the Jackson family.)
Also, I noted that there was minimal discussion of the capital costs of the tram, but one attendee did ask how much the estimated operational costs of the tram [rimshot] would be. The answer: Estimated at $900,000 per year.
At that rate, with the $45 million (soon to be more) construction cost, Jack's suggestion of a fleet of stretch limos has obvious cost benefits over the tram [rimshot]. Plus, although most OHSU employees will ride at no additional cost, non-employees (like all those visitors they are expecting) will be expected to pay a rider fee expected to be similar to a single bus ride.
Also, in the current configuration of the land in the entire SoWhat project, OHSU owns only four square blocks. I guess most of the tif funds will come from those Californicators who buy into the condo towers to the south of the OHSU SoWhat campus. It's a nice touch for OHSU, I'd say.
Posted by godfrey | December 14, 2005 1:45 PM
If the City of Portland can fund a tram, why not build and operate their own jail. Oh, that's right, the county does jails.
How about a jail tram?
Posted by Shades of Gray | December 14, 2005 3:26 PM