I can't believe how the tighty righties are attacking anyone who would have the nerve to wish them happy holidays instead of a merry Christmas. Especially the umbrage they're taking about the tree being called a holiday tree. The tree belongs to Christmas, they're insisting. If you call it a holiday tree, you're violating my First Amendment rights as a Christian, and blah blah blah.
Really? Do you think baby Jesus was born under a canopy of Doug firs? Wrong, my friends. He was born in the desert, and he probably looked a lot more like Osama bin Laden than like Lars Larson. I'm looking in my New Testament for references to the tree -- hmmm, can't seem to find them at the moment...
So now the nattering nabobs of the right are going to spend the next four weeks using the word "Christmas" as a weapon. Let's spend the season brooding about our political differences. What a pitiful group.
» Lars Larson finally goes batshit crazy from Preemptive Karma
I've had a sneaking suspicion for quite some time that radio host and conservative dingbat Lars Larson was one Crayola short of a full box. Maybe it's an effort to boost his sagging ratings. Maybe his admiration for Fox News freakshow Bill O'Reilly has... [Read More]
» What is so Offensive About The Word Christmas? from Detour
The only thing that irritated me more then spending last Christmas in the hospital was watching the television ads avoid using the word Christmas. Happy Holidays, Seasons Greetings, Joyous Season, Etc. I haven't done any research on the matter, but ... [Read More]
» It's not a Hanukkah tree from Isaac Laquedem
Two posts by Professor Bogdanski and Lars Larson, dealing with the subject of the use or non-use of the word Christmas in Christmas tree, got me thinking on the subject. I found an illuminating history of Christmas trees at The [Read More]
Miles run year to date: 220
At this date last year: 298
Total run in 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269