Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 22, 2005 2:47 AM. The previous post in this blog was Have bow tie, will travel. The next post in this blog is The things we do for love. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, September 22, 2005

One giant, selfish step for mankind

Comments (31)

"Vice President Dick Cheney said today that in an effort to pump up the White House's anemic approval ratings he would remain above ground for an entire month and would not return to his secure, undisclosed location until November.

The vice president, who emerged from his underground lair two weeks ago for a series of high-profile photo opportunities, made the surprising announcement at a press briefing in the White House. "I'm untanned, but I'm rested and ready," said Mr. Cheney, squinting at the daylight as he spoke to the White House press corps.

According to one of the vice president's aides, Mr. Cheney's decision to climb out of his subterranean hideout for the entire month of October would mean his longest visit to the earth's surface since 2001. "Dick Cheney is willing to do everything he can to help the White House's numbers, even if it means exposing himself to the ultraviolet rays of the sun," the aide said.

But according to Dr. Lars Krenzel, a scientist who studies the habitats and migration patterns of vice presidents for the University of Minnesota, Dick Cheney's extended visit to the earth's surface means "a journey into the unknown." "There is no way of predicting how Dick Cheney will respond to the earth's atmosphere," said Dr. Krenzel. "One thing is certain, however: whether he is above ground or below ground, his Halliburton stock will continue to rise."

Elsewhere, NASA said it would return to the moon by 2018, and FEMA said it would return its phone calls by 2020."

A blogfriend has a great take on this: Operation: No Moon Left Behind.

How about an aerial tram [rim shot] to the moon??

This was SUPERB, Jack!

And with the other posts today, nice set! And LOVED the 'Cheney sees his shadow' comment. Rah Rah, RAH!

Time stamp changed to move this up top for Thursday morning.


You could just as easily have included a picture from one of our inner cities. Or perhaps the Rez.

When NASA made the announcement on Tuesday the first thing that went through my head was the Gil Scott Heron song "Whitey On The Moon." The more things change....

totally agree. put this together with the money spent on the war on drugs, the war in Iraq, the shuttle program, subsidy programs, etc. - we might actually do something about poverty and crime.

I'd prefer that the government offer a $20 billion prize to the first private company that can put a person on the moon and then bring him (or her) home, with the caveat that the technology must be shared with the feds.

That's a big enough prize that it will stimulate research, and at 1/5 the cost.

As a baby boomer who is looking to retire in about eight years, it makes me wonder where is all that money going to come from to fund these kind of projects. Most state budgets rely heavily on income (Oregon) and sales tax (Washington) revenues. I'm not sure where the majority of the federal revenue is generated.

Looking into my fuzzy crystal ball, I can forsee a dramatic decline especially in income tax revenues. We may even see a decline in property tax revenues as those less fortunate delay paying their property taxes.

My spending habits will be changing too as I pay the full cost for our medical and dental insurance which I believe are deductible from our smaller income.

"Think NASA on crack"

I was one of those kids who could name more astronauts then baseball stars and I would talk my mother in to waking me up at 4:00 AM so I could watch John Glenn blast off and be the first American to orbit the Earth. I was 9 back then so I had an excuse for being naive. I want to see tons of money invested in the exploration of are Solar System even if people do starve but if it came down to the choice of having people starve or send a team of astronauts up in to a low Earth Orbit and call it space exploration I'll go w/ buying the entire world a bowl of rice every day. The manned space program should have been retired after Apollo. We learn nothing from sending a couple of white guys to the Moon, or a whole rainbow coalition into low earth orbit in the Space Shuttle. For a fraction of that or hell even the whole 100 Billion we could be doing serious unmanned exploration of our solar system instead of this goofy Bread and Circus that they are proposing now. I gotta go.

"We learn nothing from sending a couple of white guys to the Moon, or a whole rainbow coalition into low earth orbit in the Space Shuttle."

A little short-sited, don't you think? We've gleaned many technological benefits from space exploration:

"If not for America's continued investment in space exploration, we wouldn't have wireless telephones, satellite television or Global Positioning Systems. Our technology has even been used to help law enforcement put criminals behind bars and to protect firefighters. The technologies that led to the computer bar codes in retail stores, the quartz watch you are wearing, and household smoke detectors that help you sleep soundly at night were originally developed for NASA."

And just how is throwing our tax dollars at the "needy" going to alleviate poverty and over population?

Thank you, Lars.

Send robots -- fewer people will die -- and feed the hungry.

Subtracting $ from NASA = more money to fight poverty in the Sudan. As if.

This is an incredibly simple minded posting. The same criticism could be levelled at any of thousands of things the government does. Or even the things we spend our personal incomes on ... if we each stopped buying one bag of potato chips and sent the money to the Sudan, poverty would end tomorrow.

If you have a reasoned argument as to why manned exploration of the Moon is a waste of resources, make it. But to contrapose these two options in this way is just an empty rhetorical device.

If you want to save the environment, your best bet is to invest in space technology.

Off-planet colonization in very large numbers is likely the only hope for this planet.

I'm not short sighted (actually I'm far sighted) but my life hasn't been enriched near as much by Tang and Velcro as it has by the images of a volcanoe on Io, lakes of Methane on Titan, and dust devils skipping across the surface of Mars, I could go on but I won't. Check out the JPL sight some time and feast your eyes and your imagination. Off I boldly go.

Preach on, brother Paul.

But to contrapose these two options in this way is just an empty rhetorical device.

So empty that you commented on it.


An honest question, because I'm afraid I agree with your opposition this time.

There were starving people in the 1960s, too, while we worked Apollo. Were you against exploration then? If not, why is now different?

Were you against exploration then?

I was in grammar school then. This time around, technology has made it unnecessary to send human beings up there, except for macho purposes, to prove "it can be done." Sorry, feeding starving humans gets ahead of that on my list. Send robots, and pass the major, major savings that would yield on to humans in need on the ground.


Robots vs. people, and the cost/benefits of each. Okay. That's a subtle, important, interesting distiction, and a worthwhile discussion.

That subtle distinction, unfortunately, is impossible to see in your not-so-subtle post. I agree with most of your views, but I think this post sheds a lot more heat than light.

Apologies for the overestimation of your age. My question still holds, though. Setting aside the moral issues...if space exploration is immoral now because there are starving people, wouldn't it have been immoral then because there were starving people?

Thanks for the props for my dumpster post, by the way.


"moral issues" should read "robot issues"

Back then, there was no way to get some very basic data other than to send people up there and have them look at gauges. Experiments couldn't be conducted without humans physically present. We had no idea what weightlessness would do to humans. Etc. It was a different time, and the incremental benefits of "manned" spaceflight were huge. Not so now.

If there's something so precious that we still need to know (which I seriously doubt, but I'll concede the point for argument's sake), send robots. Feed people.

Plus, if you think this is going to happen for a mere $100 billion, and if you think that NASA won't waste several more human lives trying to get its mechanics right, you're not as smart as I thought you were.

I'm willing concede everything, Jack--that it will cost more than they're saying, that we'll lose people in the process, that we'd be better off sending robots...everything.

I do feel, however, that exploration is, in itself, valuable. We don't know what we don't know yet. To say "we shouldn't spend money on this because we can spend it on the starving" is too easy an argument, as it can be used to say we shouldn't spend money on roads, college scholarships, the NEA, a Big Gulp...literally anything, since nothing is more valuable than human life. That's why the way you packaged your point falls short for me this time.

To say "we shouldn't spend money on this because we can spend it on the starving" is too easy an argument, as it can be used to say we shouldn't spend money on roads, college scholarships, the NEA, a Big Gulp...literally anything, since nothing is more valuable than human life.

Maybe that's what I'm saying. I'd take a pothole right in front of my driveway if it meant they'd feed that kid.

Look, the whole old "Space Race" was a cold war battle of the superpowers ("my rocket shoots farther than yours, and my old Nazi scientists are smarter than your old Nazi scientists).

While of course lots of technogical inventions result that have other, often extrememly valuable or time-saving commercial uses (gotta love that Tang), it's utterly stupid to burn all that money now -- or ever.

And as for coloniztion of space: God, please stop them.

And the mention by Murray of Gil Scott-Heron and "Whitey on the Moon", remember "Mandate My Ass"? It stomped through my memory last November.

I agree with Jud that Jack could have just as easily shown one of the many poor, desperate people who live and die just in America every day, on the rez, in the cities, in the hollows, in the old manufacturing towns from coast to coast.

"But, the Samaritan got off his rocket ship and...."

I'm sick of George II and his Court pissing our Chinese loan monies away and wiping their asses with our childrens' future.

To say "we shouldn't spend money on this because we can spend it on the starving" is too easy an argument, as it can be used to say we shouldn't spend money on roads, college scholarships, the NEA, a Big Gulp...literally anything, since nothing is more valuable than human life.

If Jack's point is too easy, then the counterpoint--"but you could say that about ANYTHING"--is also too easy. Doesn't that inevitably lead to the point where you aren't able to criticize government spending on anything? I think the argument "we shouldn't spend money on program A because we could better spend it on program B" is a perfectly fine one--I make that argument all the time.

I think what he's saying is: look, there are serious problems in this world. Why are we starting a NEW government program that will cost $100 billion (and if you remember how accurately BushCo estimated the cost of the Medicare bill, you'd have valid reason to expect that figure to double) to essentially repeat something we did 40 years ago?


The argument in your second paragraph--why spend $100 million on something we've already done--is legitimate. Jack's arguments of "why send people when we can spend less to send robots" is also legitimate.

But, as I see it, if it's okay for Jack to criticize the space program this way, it's okay for Newt Gingrich to criticize the NEA this way. Keep Jack's picture, but change the article.

Criticizing government spending is not only fine, but necessary. I just think it's more effective to do it through analysis of the program at hand--as you have, and as Jack has in the comments--rather than through playing an emotional trump card that isn't unique to the issue at hand. In other words, since this intensely emotional argument can be used by anyone for any spending, and since it's impossible to ever argue against it, I don't think it's much of a card to play. That's all.

The boyz in the gummint that are trashing this planet know that we will soon need another.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics