Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 26, 2005 5:39 PM. The previous post in this blog was Ding dong! Duh!. The next post in this blog is Require a prescription for Sudafed?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, June 26, 2005

Best news in years

It's a sure sign that Tom Potter's doing the right thing at the Portland Development Commission: Randy Gragg hates it. He thinks Charlie Hales should have been put in charge so that we can have 10 more lines of streetcars.

Oh, and the search committee for the PDC exec was a bunch of dopes: "it was diluted by neophytes -- fine for the appearance of citizen involvement but dangerous for selecting the head of the city's $200 million-a-year economic development arm." Yes, it would have been safer to just ask Randy, and he could have asked Homer. Damn that citizen involvement that you have to put up with when you're spending hundreds of millions of tax dollars, eh Randy? It's just not cool.

But Charlie Hales is so-o-o-o-o cool. He's building a streetcar in Miami, you know. And he had coffee with Randy. Randy, who's risen from covering First Thursday to becoming the O's new super-critic of local government operations -- the self-appointed expert who tells off every neighborhood in Portland that dares to stand up to the Usual Real Estate Welfare Clients.

Of course, the way the O functions, one day, out of the blue, Randy will be transferred to the police beat in Gresham. Then within a week he'll have a job working for some developer, Charlie Hales maybe, destroying another Portland neighborhood in a "public-private partnership." Given that he's just openly ridiculed the new PDC chief, whoever it turns out to be (you talk about your dangerous moves), that turn of events might be welcomed by just about everyone but Gragg and Hales.

Comments (21)

I heard from a fairly good source that Hales didn't want it, along with nearly every other prominent possibility.

Now why would this story appear? Well there's nothing better than being mentioned as the best candidate, when you've already been eliminated as a candidate, because you eliminated yourself! No better way to look good.

Seriously, who the heck would want PDC right now, with City Hall focusing their rifle at the bullseye?

BTW, if there's going to be an unqualified blowhard playing armchair mayor and telling people off, it should be me.

That paean to Hales from Gragg is about the biggest, longest Lewinsky I've ever seen publicly executed.

I'm sure he has a beret.

Did I miss some subtle twist in Mr. Gragg's prose, or did he laud Mr. Hales for working for a company that depends on public contracts (including building mass transit lines) just before he slammed one of the other candidates for representing companies that depend on public contracts?

Yes, that was right after he said that (a) they should have brought in someone from out of town, and (b) they should have hired Hales.

I suspect that his real problem with the new PDC crew is that they're not beholden to the same people he's beholden to.

What bothers me is that its gotten to the point that whenever I read Gragg's articles, I spend the whole time thinking how is Jack Bog gonna react.

and well, this is kind of how I thought you would respond...

You've had your fun, Jack. Gragg may be a sycophant, but Hales should be the Mayor of this city, not Tom Potter. He's got big ideas, so that makes him bad in your book.

Hales may not agree with your policy prescriptions. But he's no "unqualified blowhard." You've really descended into an ad hominem attack here Jack, a sure sign that your real arguments aren't holding water.

Gordo
-----"Hales should be the Mayor of this city"----

That would require him to actually run for the job, campaign and possibly even answer tough questions.
Hales' high level of arrogance and low level of genuine skills leaves him effectively lazy and not up to such a challenge.

He likely feels that task is also beneath him.

It's so much easier to be anointed or appointed.

Hales I'm sure would love the PDC job and the opportunity to further mislead the public while spending millions of general fund dollars on PDC play time land speculation.

Hales is full of misplanning babble. Hopelessly out to lunch when it come to REAL planning involving such bazaar notions as efficient transit, traffic congestion, commerce mobility, affordable housing, and legitimate public funded economic development.

Stay away Charlie. We don't need your services.

And, yes it's general fund tax dollars devoured by the PDC despite another dose of the PDC deception in today's O. Deception I'm sure Hales views as justified.
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/index.ssf?/base/news/1119866179243850.xml&coll=7

---"Development agency must open books to city review"----

In this story the PDC scam is echoed with,

----"The commission,,,, uses tax money,,,, Most of the money it uses to spur urban redevelopment comes from federal grants, private donations and tax-increment financing, rather than from the city's general fund."-----

False and misleading is putting it mildly.
The bulk of their revenue is indeed general fund money.
Hopefully, City Auditor Blackmer (as a side bar to his upcoming audit) will once and for all make clear to the public that the PDC spends general fund money. That they do so through Tax Increment Financing which skims off money heading to general fund budgets just prior to it arriving there.
The vast majority of PDC funny money comes from this skimming or diverting process. From the 1000s of acres in the city's 11 Urban Renewal Districts the PDC takes every single annual increase in property taxes collected from every single property in the districts. Those County tax assessor, automatic increases, of at least 3% per year, would otherwise be going to basic services including schools, parks, police, fire, jails, libraries and misc. social programs. Services and programs which see their costs rise every year without that increased revenue because of the PDC.

Auditor Blackmer, make this clear.

Charlie Hales certainly would not.

As long as the Auditor also makes it clear that this "diversion" of funds isn't some nefarious scheme hatched by the evil Red Lectroids from Planet PDC, but simply the way thay state lawmakers drafted urban renewal law.

Oh, and also that some of the problems are caused by problematic property tax laws which were pushed by anti-tax zealots, many of whom now are also the ones most rabidly going after urban renewal.

Which is not, of course, to say that all critics of urban renewal fit into the above, and not, of course, to say that all criticism of urban renewal or PDC is unfounded. It's just that as long as we're playing the "let's give people the whole picture" game, I figured I should toss in the other bits that people like to ignore as well, on the other side.

No b!x you're just trying to cloud the issue.

You had ample opportunities to clarify the scandalous skimming of basic services dollars and YOU chose not to.
You have proven yourself to be as deceptive as the PDC.
As far as tax laws and "anti-tax zealots" go, the point here is if the PDC were not skimming countless millions every year from basic services the need for additional taxes to back fill the skimming would not be needed. Or certainly far less of a need.
The fact that the skimming leads to illegitimate
spending without accoutability makes it even worse.
You just can't play it straight can you?

Also, the legislature and legislation does not give license to or excuse public official's deceiving the public on their spending practices.

If the public doesn't know about the skimming, thanks to people like you, then they aren't going to be calling on any legislative fixes now are they.

Your dance is sure getting old.

Play a new song and get off the partisan crap.

Remember, you're progressive and a champion of basic services, right?

One more too often silenced fact is the line item on Portland property tax bills for Urban Renewal.
Including properties NOT in UR districts.
1.70/per thousand.

We need full auditing and full news reporting.

One more too often silenced fact is the line item on Portland property tax bills for Urban Renewal.

That line exists because of the self-same laws which meddled with property tax calculations and limits -- you know, the ones you say cloud the issue.

How PDC is funded is an artifact of the state laws governing urban renewal. The issue is with those laws, not with PDC following those laws -- PDC is just an example of the effect those laws have. Further, those urban renewal laws are impacted by the property tax laws. The issue is with those laws, not with PDC following those laws -- PDC is just an example of the effect of those laws.

You just can't play it straight, can you?

I agree with Randy Gragg on this one. Hales should have been chosen for PDC's top job. And what's wrong with "10 more lines of streetcars"? That's precisely what Portland should set its sights on.

The PDC's spending power is enabled by a city council that keeps creating, approving and extending UR Districts. The ultimate fault is with them. They don't have the money to pay for basic services because they keep borrowing money to pay for new projects.

B!x would blame state UR laws for the City's borrowing mess?!?

As if the City Council needs a state law to prevent it from spending the grocery money on lotto tickets.

Maybe he's right. Instead of cracking down on payday loan shops, maybe the legislature should prevent spendthrift city councils from borrowing against their municipal-function revenue base through UR Districts altogether.

Poor ignorant City Comm's, why should we let the Homer's of the world continue to exploit their inability to perform simple math?

OH that is such BS b!X.
Your dancing infantile bit on state UR law is nauseous.
The issue IS the deliberately clouded, or covered up, funding of and spending by the PDC.
The virtual defrauding of the public with claims such as
"Urban Renewal is pay as you go", or
"Urban Renewal pays for itself" or "
"No general fund money is used".

The abuse, or as you say "effects" of the State law are being purposefully obscured by the PDC
because they enjoy the ability to take and spend without the public grasping what they are doing.

The UR levy on every property tax bill in the city takes $60 million alone.

The massive PDC skimming in UR districts is like diverting a river (revenue stream) before it gets to the reservoir (general fund services) followed by the LIE that no water (general fund dollars)
were taken.

You apparently like that approach as well.

Since you are abundantly aware of this scheme
I'll say again that you are dishonest.

The PDC is as just about as crooked as it gets. Using tax dollars to scam the public, ripping off basic services, padding salaries, doling out cash/subsidies like it was funny money, conflict of interest joint venturing and using more tax dollars to sway elected official and promote it all as good for the public.

It appears you want this debate to lean away from genuine transparency or clarity and towards some patisan form you advocate but you are ill-prepared to counter the takings and spending so wrongfully perpetrated by the City and PDC.

Aside from the pluses and minuses of the streetcar, it appears some readers have short term memory loss.

Mr. Hales quit the city council after it was revealed he took most of the summer off. When asked by a reporter how he justified that he said, somewhat arrogantly, who in their right mind would spend August in Portland?

Additionally, Mr. Hales oversaw Portland's building permit system. How anyone could defend that morass of bureaucratic quick sand is a mystery to me.

How does one with that work history make the case that they are capable of taking on an entrenched bureaucracy such as is the PDC?

Grand vision is fine but that is not what the PDC is wanting in.

Gordo, the "unqualified blowhard" I referred to was not Hales. It was me vs. Gragg.

Indeed, the post was not about Hales much at all. It was about Gragg.

But I will say that streetcars are a waste of the city's precious tax dollars, and if we never build another inch of them, it's fine with me.

"Grand vision" a la Hales-Katz-Sten mostly meant "big bucks for Neil Goldschmidt's clients." Pardon me if I pass on more of that.

You don't think that was an accident do you?

I am sure that Choo Choo Charlie is angling for something and calling in some chits to get his name back into circulation.

Perhaps a Senatorial run at Smith?

Actually Hales quit when the water run-off fees were killed by the business community.

I remember... I was on the stump with him one day and he was touting all these "big ideas" and, almost as an aside, I asked "so what if you don't get the revenues for all your big ideas/promises? Do you quit?"... the whole event, even in my mind, just kinda wandered off the radar screen until not too long later that yeesh... he did quit!

So, when he runs out of public money for his toys he quits. Big ideas are nice when you are forcing others to pay for them.

TrackBack

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Best news in years:

» How (Or Whether) To Fund Urban Renewal? from The One True b!X's PORTLAND COMMUNIQUE
What had started out as a Jack Bogdanski post about the joys not not getting Charlie Hales at the Portland Development Commission became a conflict over defining the relevant issues of how urban renewa... [Read More]


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 324
At this date last year: 176
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics