Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 7, 2005 4:55 AM. The previous post in this blog was Karoshi. The next post in this blog is Planned slowdown. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, February 7, 2005

Lifestyles of the Rich and Dead

Big tax news in Washington State last week: The State Supreme Court threw out the state's estate tax. That's the tax that wealthy people have to pay when they die, on the property that they leave behind. (Actually, you can't pay a tax when you're dead, but your family has to do it for you.)

Oooh, the "death tax," evil evil evil, right? Actually, no. Picture a guy like Bill Gates, whose net worth has grown by tens of billions in his lifetime. You know how much tax he's paid on the growth of his Microsoft stock all those years? None. That's why there's a death tax.

Interestingly, Bill's dad has been a major proponent of keeping the estate taxes on the books. Now, there's a family that's willing to chip in its fair share... eventually.

Anyway, to all you rich types in the great State of Washington, don't spend it all in one place.

Comments (38)

"You know how much tax he's paid on the growth of his Microsoft stock all those years? None. That's why there's a death tax."

Oh my god, so what? Did he have a good idea? Yes. Did he capitalize on his good idea to become rich? Yes. So what? Here's the other important part: Should you punish him (via his estate) for singlehanded putting gajillions of money into Washington's economy via the thousands of jobs his vision created?

The "Death Tax" and "Capital Gains Tax" are all about punishing people for their having the balls, the audacity, to have invested their money wisely, to have put money into the economy (where, by the way, it helped OTHER people make money) and to have done so successfully.

He also profited from the laws of the State of WA, and the United States. And from the infrastructure that helped him develop and send his products out into the world. As his (and all our) wealth depends on the function of a stable society and its laws and mechanisms that allow for the creation of that wealth, he should pay (as should we all). It's foolish to suggest that wealth is created in a vacuum or solely as the result of one man's audacity.

Does this include big ol’ lars?

Jud says,
""""It's foolish to suggest that wealth is created in a vacuum or solely as the result of one man's audacity.""""""
Derek never "suggested" any such thing.
That is your twist and contortion to provide yourself a way to argue against what he didn't say.
In fact he said just the opposite. That Gates invested and created within the Washington economy resulting in a economic lift and thousands of jobs. All along the "infrastructure" and "stable society" benefited, over and over again. Of course there was certainly no vacuum.
The problem with your angle is you can't recognize the magnitude of the automatic contribution to the greater good a Gates wealth creation process provides at every level of growth. The you feel it is inadequate of the government can't take another whack after death to devour and redistribute.

It's all so cut and dry when you throw out Bill Gates as an example.

What about a family owned business that *on the books* is worth a few million, but cash poor? The people who inherit it owe a substantial amount of cash to the government. Chances are, they'd have to sell it in order to make good with the taxman. What happens to all those jobs, Jack?? Huh? In your fight for the little guy, you may actually be doing more harm (depends on which little guy for whom you think you're fighting).

And what if I decide to put 50% of what I make into the stock market for the next 60 years. I've already paid tax on that money once. Why should my heirs have to pay tax on it again, outside the capital gains? "Because we live in America" is the best excuse you guys can come up with? I'm sure the participants of the Boston Tea Party are rollin' in their grave over that one...."you should gladly give over thy wealth to the King, for it is He who allows you to prosper!"

Hello!?!? Governments spend money inefficiently. "Urban renewal zone" ring a bell, Jack?

Only the richest two percent of US families pay any estate tax at all. These are people with estates larger than $1.5 million for an individual or $3 million for a couple. Small business owners and family farmers don't have this kind of money stashed away.

Plus, half of all estate taxes are paid by the wealthiest 0.1% of the American population – about 3,000 familes a year.

So it's okay if it only affects a few people. That sounds fair. Tyranny of the majority...

My point is that the inheritors of that money will spend that money more efficiently than the government. I don't really care how many people it affects. In my book, that's a red herring to get us commoners in an "us against them" mood. Doesn't go very far with me.

Wow, lots of anger on the comment board today.

Anyway, apart from being a source of revenue, the federal estate tax was enacted to mitigate against the concentration of vast wealth within a family down through the generations. I believe that this is a legitimate goal, but of course it is reasonable to argue just who should be paying the tax, i.e., how rich do you have to be before you are taxed. In my opinion, the exemption levels are currently a bit low, though they are rising through 2009.

Now as for taxing the unrealized appreciation in value of assets, under current law this is not done at death - that income goes forever untaxed. Not a bad deal. Mark, you appear to agree that such appreciation should be taxed (or at least you are under the belief that it is), but that the transfer of the property should not be. That's fine, but it must be understood that there are two completely separate taxes at play - an income tax and a wealth transfer tax.

As for the capital gains tax being a punishment, that comment is so absurd as to not even warrant comment.


I think it's great that you don't want families getting too much money. Good for you.

You don't have to think like I do. This is isn't Russia. Is this Russia? This isn't Russia, Danny.

But what I'm *trying* (albeit poorly) to get across to you is that taxing people just because they're rich, or because traditionally we've done so, is no excuse. (Slavery was a tradition)

The more money the government gets, the less efficiently it will be spent. That's the bottom line.

Jeesh... and I thought the religious right ruined the Republican party. I'm starting to think it's the Pork Barrel Republicans now.

Even if the estate tax were eliminated, the gains on Gates' Microsoft stock would still be taxable to his heirs if they ever wanted to sell the stock and do something with the money.
The fact is that the estate tax today is in somewhat the same state that the income tax was 25 years ago. At that time the top income tax rate was 70%, but almost no one paid at that rate through judicious use of what were then perfectly legal tax shelters. Remember cattle futures?
The top estate tax rate today is near 50%, but again, the super wealthy are able to reduce the effective rate dramatically through the use of charitable foundations, life insurance trusts, and family limited partnerships. By the way, Jack's an expert in this area.

I'm clear on what he said. "Singlehandedly." I'm afraid we can't measure his actual contribution monetarily. But, given that he has been rewarded disproportionately to his input, he ought also to give back more, even if it's after death. I'm thrilled to note that "he" has given substantially to the WA economy in lift and jobs. Perhaps you could balance that against the economic incentives Microsoft has received and the taxes they haven't paid.

The thing is, Mark, it's a new tradition that the founding fathers made up to counteract the old tradition of rich aristocratic families running the countries. I suppose you would prefer to go back to that?

Kai, you're wasting your breath. Mark doesn't know how to debate in a civil manner, at least not when he's sitting behind a computer screen.


A little sarcasm and I'm lacking in civility..

>The thing is, Mark, it's a new tradition that the >founding fathers made up to counteract the old >tradition of rich aristocratic families running the countries

And it's worked oh so well... let's see... GWBush, Andover and Yale... John Kerry... St. Paul's School and Yale...Al Gore....St. Albans, Harvard.

The old money *already* controls the government.

Now I'm being argumentative just for arguing's sake. I'm sorry to have soiled this blog. Seriously. I'll stop now.

What if Bill Gates had been born in the Congo...

Don't forget about the society and its tax payers who helped create the environment for Gates' success.


Our founding fathers made up the "new tradition" of the estate tax?

I didn't realize Alexander Hamilton was still kicking around in 1916.

I'm sure you'll tell me that Thomas Paine once pamphletted in support of an inheritance tax for England. (Under a theory of having royal families make reparations to commoners for generations of profitting from a monarchical government).

Not exactly appropos considering it was a different country, and, even if you applied it to America, these arguments were forwarded before the existence of the Federal Income Tax and enormous growth of the welfare state.

The Founding Fathers warned against concentration of wealth.

The reason that the estate tax was instituted in the early 20th century was that we had never seen such concentrations of wealth as emerged in the late 19th century (due to industrialization). Political and economic theorists argued that such concentrations undermined the liberal foundations of our Republic. Democrats and Republicans have supported the estate tax since then.

The new tradition is the attack on the estate tax that has emerged due to a well-financed campaign bankrolled by very wealthy Americans.

The numbers are an issue because they put a lie to claims that the estate tax destroys family businesses or farms. This is simply a lie. Very few, very wealthy families pay the estate tax. The vast, vast majority of family wealth is passed on and is not taxed.

Mark: and Jimmy Carter, and Ronald Reagan, and Richard Nixon, and LBJ, and Ike, and .... all presidents who rose from modest or even impoverished roots.

Who was it that once said something like: 'Wealth is like manure. You need to spread it around to create fertile ground for growth.'

Good idea sid. However, when it's your manure that you worked hard to earn. I bet you wouldn't be too intrested in giving it to some fat, lazy, scamming negro.

the prof: The new tradition is the attack on the estate tax that has emerged due to a well-financed campaign bankrolled by very wealthy Americans.

A vague and unsubstantiated statement that essentially says "two rich guys" are trying to pull the wool over our eyes.

me: taxing income twice is not fair. taxing people solely because they "have a lot" is not fair.

A straight shooting theory on what I believe is fair taxation.

I spent 6 months in East Berlin as a student. I've seen firsthand what can happen by removing the impetus for wealth creation. The native East German guy I rented a room from lamented about the old days of his "construction work" when they'd get drunk on Russian vodka if they ran out of nails, or paint, or concrete for the day(although from the looks of things over there, they had plenty of concrete). They had no reason to work harder, because it got them nothing more. As a result, their country was filthy (the Trabant!), architecture consisted of monolithic concrete forms, and generally their lives looked miserable.

To the end of my days, I will always believe that it is wrong to remove the desire to create more wealth by mandating that the government "deserves" it instead.

Look, I'm no crazy loon looking to get rid of all taxes. I appreciate the interstate highway system (hey, that's how I got here), our armed forces, parks, ... I can even tolerate public transportation - I've seen how crazy privatized busses are from my travels to Quito. And I can see how insanely wealthy people don't necessarily do good things with it (Paul Allen/Trailblazers?) and where it would seem more fair to the rest of us to take it away, but I just don't agree with it.

ok, now I'm done.


Let me put it simply for you.

Money is the root of all evil.

Now it is one thing to become evil due to your own efforts (we try to stop it from happening but some people are very stubborn). However, it is really tragic when an innocent person just inherits all that evil through no fault of his own.

We don't want these innocent people to become tainted by their parents' evil money, do we?

So we try to help purify them by laundering as much of the evil money through the government's washing machine as we can get away with.

When the goverment is finished cleaning the money, we all get to wear nice clean clothes.

How wonderful for everyone. Win-win-win.

And please don't ask questions about things like "earning", "individual responsibility" or "ownership". Those are illegitimate concepts intentionally designed to cull you from the collective consciousness.

You're thinking way too much Mark.

funny how most of the comments delve into policy of the estate tax repeal. i am going to restrict my comments to the court's opinion... did any of you actually read the opinion?

the court's decision basically took statutory language and said that the legislature could not have meant what it said. funny, i've seen lots of folks in jesusland calling judges "activists" for doing exactly that. i guess i won't hold my breath waiting for the outrage on talk radio about the judges who wrote this opinion.

I read the case and I reach a different conclusion from Jack. I don't think the Washington Supreme Court threw out the Washington estate tax. It simply ruled that the state of Washington can't collect more than the amount allowed as a credit for state taxes on the federal estate tax return.

At least until the federal estate tax is repealed in 2010 (for one year), that means some estate tax can still be collected in the State of Washington. The decision, by the way, is based on the court's interpretation of a voter-passed initiative which the legislature supposedly codified, only they chose not to update it.

I don't think this is a particularly radical opinion.

I'm simply amazed by the fact that so few Americans don't want to understand what our taxes pay for and what we get in return for paying those taxes. If you don't want taxes move to Saudi Arabia (no taxation, no representation.) Or move to a country where you can get away without paying a dime, like the Congo.

As a business owner this is what I need for my business to continue: good roads to transfer my products from Portland to other places in the country, good communication systems, the FAA, continued research in computer technology at public universities that will then be integrated into companies' products and services (the internet has helped my business), continued oversite of commercial kitchens to keep our processed food safe (I'm in the food business and contract with a commercial kitchen that makes my product), a good postal system, educated people whom I can hire, a Department of Agriculture that will ensure safe ag products (my food products are farm based)...

And I'm just a tiny business here in Portland. Imagine what Bill Gates needs from the government to keep Microsoft up and running, and what he needed to even get it started. Thanks to the government's research and development of the internet, Bill Gates has done even better than he would have without an internet. All the technology that Bill Gates used to start Microsoft has all been initially research at public universities through government grants.

The whole concept of progressive taxation is based on what I have discussed above.

The estate, gift, and generation skipping transfer taxes are taxes on the act of transfering wealth - they are not income taxes. That's no argument for or against any of them, but the estate, gift, and generation skipping transfer taxes do not result in double taxation of income. In fact, as noted above, the current system allows unrealized appreciation (i.e., unrealized income) to go untaxed forever, therefore eliminating income tax altogether. Again, not a bad deal.

The corporate tax, now there's double taxation of income.

And it should be noted that the current gift and estate tax rates are less than 50%, and after some fancy estate planning, effectively WELL below that, so we shouldn't conjure the image of government officials showing up to confiscate your estate when you die, leaving your loved ones to fend for themselves; if you die with a billion dollars (and no estate planning), your family still gets over half a billion.

I work for incredibly wealthy clients, and trust me when I say that the gift and estate taxes are absolutely no disincentive to earn more.


Jack R: The court said that the State of Washington can't collect more than the federal credit for state death taxes paid. "Any amount of a state estate tax not fully absorbed by a current federal credit is an invalid independent tax."

The current federal credit has been reduced to zero effective in 2005. See IRC (federal) sec. 2011(f). So if you die today in Washington, the state estate tax is zip.

So, as near as I can gather from Erik this is the situation:

There is an estate tax. However, due to the mind-numbingly complicated tax code, most *really* rich people get around it by hiring people like him to find the loopholes. So in essence, there isn't an estate tax. Well, not much of one. Unless you're not quite rich enough to afford someone like Erik.

The estate tax is just keeping a dizzying array of attorneys and accountants busy, distorting the actual GDP of the country.

Is that about right?

"He also profited from the laws of the State of WA, and the United States. And from the infrastructure that helped him develop and send his products out into the world. As his (and all our) wealth depends on the function of a stable society and its laws and mechanisms that allow for the creation of that wealth, he should pay (as should we all). It's foolish to suggest that wealth is created in a vacuum or solely as the result of one man's audacity."

Very much what Bill Gates says, Jud. Bill Gates, Sr. -- most recently to the Washington State legislature the week before last. He is a powerful and scolding critic of the regressive taxation in Washington, and says society is selling way short the contributions of those in specific and all in general who lay the foundation (in infrastructure, in research, in education) for such phenomenal achievements as have been made by his son. He scolded the legislature for the fact that the poor pay a greater percentage of their income in taxes than the rich. He asks who will argue that this is as it should be? He says it is those who have profited so significantly by their business activities that should contribute to the government that makes such achievement possible.

Most of the arguments to the contrary here sound like Ayn Rand overboard. Never there breathed a communist so rigid and so humanly shortsighted, in her reaction to the same, as she. She merely outdid Lenin at a 180 reverse.

But what would Bill Gates, Sr. know?

This is stupifyingly dumb.

Let's put the estate tax aside for a moment.

What taxes do you REALLY pay? It blows you away, in the USA.

You probably think of taxes as just Federal and State income tax. Idiot.

There's that and much more

You pay a tax on the electricity that powers the alarm clock so you can wake up early in the morning, go to work, and provide more taxable income. Peed, did ya? There's another tax, that would be for flushing. Keep going, it just gets worse.

Don't forget the FCC tax for your cable tv. The line tax on your phone, the sin tax on your beer, wine, or smokes.

Sin-free? Good for you! You'll pay taxes that much longer. Government loves that. Oh, of course then there are fees, which really aren't taxes - but of course, you knew that.


The quote is not "Money is the root of all evil", but "LOVE of money is the root of all evil". Now, start over.

Sid Anderson:
"Imagine what Bill Gates needs from the government to keep Microsoft up and running."

You mean like protectionism? Subsidies? Restraint-of-trade laws disguised as "consumer protection"? Onerous copyright and patent monopolies? The zoning laws that let companies set up these isolated campuses, cut off from interaction with the surrounding civic environment? The whole idea that corporations are people, thus shielding the true malefactors (repeat after me: corporations don't break laws and pollute, the people in charge of corporations break laws and pollute) from jail time?

Gee, thanks, but no thanks. I'd rather try my hand with less governement involvement.

Jack--That's why you're teaching tax law and I'm not. I knew the federal estate tax was being phased out (at least temporarily) but I was unaware they had eliminated the state tax credit.

I stand corrected.

I agree 100% with you. But for now, we've got what we've got and the execs at the big M should be on their knees thanking the government through large tax payments that should be used for public education, conservation, protecting our water and air, health care, and anything else that helps promote the general welfare of the American people. Instead they just made hundreds of millions more through their $3 a share tax free divedend payment.

Believe me, I'm no fan of Microsoft. One of our computers runs on Linux and we use Firefox.

As to you Jay,
Try living in a country where you pee and the sewer systems don't work. Take my word for it, it stinks to high heaven.

No, there is an estate tax. And a gift tax. And a generation skipping transfer tax. Yes, you can hire an attorney to help you reduce that tax burden, and attorneys are expensive, but not as expensive as the tax, and that's why people faced with the tax will often hire one.

If your problem is no longer that the government is robbing the rich and giving to the poor (I seemed to have convinced you on that point, Mark), but that the law is keeping attorneys busy, let's do away with criminal laws, immigration laws, the Constitution, etc... No laws, no lawyers.

Also, I'm not an estates attorney, and even without the transfer tax system, such attorneys would still have work to do.


So how many reasons do Portland's small business owners have to look northward?

No state income tax, no county I-tax, no BIT tax, better schools, fewer obstructive gov't layers and you get to leave your estate to your kids w/o the spending class appropriating it for "progressive redistribution".

Earlier, somebody dismissed estate tax criticisms as sounding like "Ayn Rand overboard".

Interesting comment as we continue to watch Atlas shrug its way across the Columbia.

The only reason to be up at 5:20 PST is if one is still drunk, or if one is hitting the river early, before work.

"So how many reasons do Portland's small business owners have to look northward?"

Oh, then they'd bitch about the gross receipts tax. What Bill Gates, Sr. seemed to be sick and scolding about was the regressivity of Washington State's tax system. Taxing the poor more than the rich. As I said, he asked who would argue that this is how it should be? He might see who -- here.

Washington State ostensibly has the most regressive tax system in the country. Yes, look northward! I suppose this new ruling could make it even more so. And give the father of the world's richest man even more to rail (in his mild-mannered but very studied way) against.

Oregon also use to have excellent schools back in the 70s and 80s before M5. It takes a few years for those tax cuts to start working through the education system. I'll place my bets: The Washington state public school system will begin to go downhill.

Sid says,
"""Oregon also use to have excellent schools back in the 70s and 80s before M5"""

Until recently Oregon outspent Washginton by 1300 per student. Money is not the problem.

Horrific state education administrators and worthless programs they perpetuate are the problem. If M5 had not come around about the same time, the CIM/CAM reform would have devoured even more than it has with NOTHING to show for it.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
GascĂłn, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria DermoČ—t - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics