Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 28, 2004 4:00 PM. The previous post in this blog was 'Nother hap'nin' gal. The next post in this blog is The guy who put Baby in the corner.... Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, December 28, 2004

Take this

The law school at which I teach is starting off the new year by throwing a major confab next Wednesday, Jan. 5, on Ballot Measure 37. This is the now-enacted law that requires land use regulators in Oregon to pay property owners money when new regulations (or new enforcement of old regulations) decrease the values of the owners' property. (It's the end of Oregon as we know it -- but don't get me started on that today.)

The "Measure 37 Summit," as it's being called, will be an all-day affair at the Oregon Convention Center (come and hear the wind whistle through Vera's White Elephant), with a live webcast available as well. Early registration ends tomorrow, Dec. 29. For more information, go here.

Comments (20)

I completely agree with Jack that measure 37 is the end of Oregon as we know it.

The following is a potential scenario which just shows one of the major problems with this measure:
Property owner A seeks to build a commercial building on land B zoned for residential use only. County C cannot afford to pay and so waives the restriction. Property owner A builds ugly commercial building on land B. Neighboring (or closely neighboring) property owners D, E, and F experience a decrease in the value of their respective homesteading properties due to the commercial building on land B being placed in an area zoned for residential use only.

As far as I can tell, property owners D, E, and FE are SOL and don't get to sue property owner A for their respective decreases in property value.

I guess the argument is that property owners D, E, and F should just build commercial buildings on their homestead properties (homestead meaning the homes in which they live). Yeah, that's practical. (please note the sarcasm in the last sentence).

Anyway, Jack, from browsing the list of speakers, I don't see any obvious pro-measure 37 presenters unless some of the attorneys from the big firms represent that view.

Aren't "Oregonians in Action" the bad guys? The Oregon Home Builders will also be very "pro," and the two appraisers will be laughing all the way to the bank.

they are only "bad guys" from your perspective.

You are right. Some of them are gals.

Wait wait wait wait wait wait wait. In Hilsy's confusingly constructed scenario, how does Property Owner A have a right to construct commercial buildings on residential property with County C allegedly unable to pay what? I don't even want to try to detail out all the things that do not make sense to me in that scenario. There may be problems with this law, but I do not see them fetchingly cast. Is this a matter of faith?

If there is one thing I am pretty sure of, though, from 40-plus years in Oregon, it is that Oregon has already ended as I knew it. Praise Tom McCall for still-public beaches. As nearly ever thus, the continuance of anything or everything is left to immigrants and inheritors.

are you in land use?
no exams are done biatch
vacation is here

so stop exam mode
shut the f up hilsy cuz
jack don't dig that crap

As far as I can tell, property owners D, E, and FE are SOL and don't get to sue property owner A for their respective decreases in property value.

Except in those localities which have passed ordinances re: M37 which include the right of private action.

Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice

I was reading in ABA Journal yesterday that Oregon courts are closed on Fridays. Holy Sh*t man, is that true? And now this. Sounds like times are tough in that great western state of yours. Bummer

B!X rightly corrected me in that some counties (but not all) have added a private right of action.

Sally, the scenario I presented is one where the county would choose to waive the land use restriction rather than pay property owner A. That is not very far-fetched when considering how cash-strapped most counties are in Oregon.

And lawe, this isn't law school. This is real life in my native state. Will they start building on the beaches next?

As I understand it, if the zoning of the property was residential when it was purchased, then the owner would have no claim toward commercial development now. It would only be if the property was zoned commercially at the time of purchase and the zoning was subsequently changed to residential during that one owners continuous ownership. Am I misinformed on this?


Unfortunately, measure 37 is far more sweeping. Note Jack's mention of new enforcement of old regulations. Remember the TV commercials starring the elderly woman who owned land up near Skyline?

RE: Mr Hilsy's comments:

I read the M37 link Mr Bog was nice enough to post and one of the exmeptions from M37 is 3(E) - Land use regulations enacted prior to date of acquistion by property owner. So in his case, the new owner buys the property with the zoning "as-is" and would not be able to change from private to commercial use (unless he wanted to go thru a zoning change request.)

I hear all of the fear-mongering (one more "end of Oregon as we know it" would really make my day), but my sense is, based on the above, that M37 is intended to put a damper on government changing zoning/permitted use after someone owns a piece of property.

I voted for it, unfortunately while holding my nose, but I think protecting private property rights shoud be paramount to some government entity deciding they want to change a property owner's right to use his land as he purchased it.

I wish there was another way, but government regulating itself out of abusing property owner's rights is not going to happen on its own.

In response to Steve's comments, here is the text of the subsection he cites:

"(3)Subsection (1) of this act shall not apply to land use regulations:
(E) Enacted prior to the date of acquisition of the property by the owner or a family member of the owner who owned the subject property prior to acquisition or inheritance by the owner, whichever occurred first."

First, the scenario I attempted to paint would still apply if a long-standing owner decided to significantly alter the use of the owner's property (and they lived in a county that did not provide a private right of action in response).

Second, this subsection effectively freezes current zoning laws/ordinances because enactment of ANY new land use laws (not covered under the nuisance/safety exemptions) trigger potential claims for compensation for two years subsequent to their enactment (see section (5)). Would any of the fiscally stuggling counties dare to gamble on passing a new zoning law?

Within the city limits of Portland, that may not present too much of a problem. But how about any attempts by Deschutes County to manage its exploding growth through use of land use laws? Tough nuts for them, I guess.

I think I understand some of the reasons measure 37 passed. For me they mirror the reasons Measure 5 passed over a deacde ago: people in government arrogantly ignoring a real problem. The state government in the 1980s (BTW under the "astute" leadership of then-speaker of the house Vera Katz) year after year ignored the fact that numerous property tax roll-back initiatives came dangerously close to passing. And in recent years, despite measure 7 passing (but subsequently ruled unconstituional), state and local governments forged ahead aggressively with new zoning laws.

So Steve, if you were advising a county government under this law, would suggest any new zoning laws?

Mr Hilsy - My advice to county governments is to take existing establishing zoning very seriously. If they wanted to change existing zoning on a property, then make sure it is something they want to do and is worth paying for. In other words, if someone buys a piece of property zoned as-is, make it hard for government to change that zoning and, in turn, the value of that property.

I guess this is a moratorium on zoning changes. You talk about Deschutes County, however if property is zoned Forest or Agricultural, then why would the county want to change it to higher density residential? If the county did do that, then I guess do an SDC to a developer to pay for the diff.

I mean the Metro boundary has had the same effect on limiting pop growth by driving up prices within their boundary.

I think this string is indicative of how people are very uninformed about this measure. Before saying (or repeating) the mantra of "the sky is falling" people should know of what they speak.

This measure constitutes a radical change in Oregon law. There is no serious debate about that.

Hilsy’s example highlights the burdens to the other neighboring property owners, but what also troubles me is the benefits the M37 property owner gets from the neighbors being subject to the land use regulations the M37 property owner isn’t.

By way of example – say a property owner owns property in an area zoned one house per 5 acres – say it’s on a hillside in Tillamook with a view of the ocean. Well, everyone surrounding the M37 property owner has only built one house per 5 acres. But, now the M37 property owner can build to whatever density they want. So in effect they the benefit of their neighbors being burdened by the land use regulations: they get great views because their neighbors have not built houses all around them which block their view, and the benefit of not having a subdivision feel all around them. The M37 property owner’s property is now worth much more than if the land use regulations had not existed at all.

That still would be the case if and only if the property owner you describe as the M37 owner purchased the property before the 5 acre rule went into effect. Measure 37 doesn't allow anyone to attempt to alter restrictions that were in place when they purchased the property, but only to request to re-develop based on the rules that were in place at the time of purchase. If someone wants to change zoning that was in existence since the time of purchase, they have to try for a zoning change just like they always have had to. Unless there are scads of Dorothy English type ninety somethings that purchased their property forty or fifty years ago and never developed it there won't be very many scenarios like you describe. The overwhelming yes vote on measure 37, in my view, was primarily a reaction against elitist planners doing nonsensical things, like designating wildlife zones in already urbanized areas, etc.

imagine a pre-land use planning, no zoning owner of a massive amount of once beautifully timbered, still encompassing invaluable stream, rivers, eco systems, etc land...
now imagine it all being urbanizable...
owner in msr 37 does not exclude corps.
hmmm...i wonder were all the contributions for 37 came from.
destination resorts/cities...
you want to see oregon? look in the rear view mirror.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
GascĂłn, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
MarchigĂĽe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria DermoČ—t - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics