Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 29, 2003 2:14 AM. The previous post in this blog was Letter from Diane. The next post in this blog is Champ of the airwaves. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, September 29, 2003

One ringy-dingy

Well, some federal judge somewhere has decided that the national "do not call" list, which allows folks to block telemarketers' calls, is unconstitutional.

My first reaction? I'm starting to lose what respect I had left for federal judges. My cooler, second reaction? The judge is just doing his or her job -- it's the Supreme Court's ill-advised "commercial speech" doctrine that's at fault. Under that doctrine, even the Coors Light twins are protected First Amendment speech. (Not that there's anything wrong with -- twins! Named Klimaszewski!)

But under the Supreme Court doctrine, Congress can regulate commercial speech to further important state interests. The right to be left alone, free of commercial messages, in one's home would seem to be such an interest. Having a phone does not imply consent to unwanted telemarketing calls. We'll see.

The judge probably would have gone along with the list, but for the fact that the law creating it is limited to commercial telemarketing; it does not allow residents to opt out of unsolicited calls from politicians and charities. Well, that's easy enough to remedy -- make those folks subject to the "do not call" list as well. Indeed, most constituents would have preferred them to be included in the ban to begin with. I hate calls from the whole lot of them.

And if Congress won't do that? Then let's have a constitutional amendment OK'ing the law as currently written. It would pass with flying colors, in record time.

Telemarketers, the jig is up. Go find a real job.

Comments (12)

It's really interesting, because I helped write one of the state do-not-call list laws, and certainly when we wrote it, we all believed that you HAD to exempt charities and political calls in order NOT to run afoul of the First Amendment. It's wacky, because now that's exactly what the judge said was unconstitutional. Don't we all feel silly.

Most telemarketing call-staff face being jobless anyway: I've noticed a lot of calls are recorded now.

Apropos of twins, have you been watching football on TV enough to notice that the infamous Coors Light twins actually have a role in "Scary Movie 3"? The "Scary Movie" franchise should not surprise us with the conflation of commercial pop culture and pop culture commercials, but still, it makes you wonder whether Coors Light paid the studio for the product placement, or vice-versa.

Telemarketing, like panhandling, is First Amendment protected speech. Having a phone does imply consent to unwanted calls, just like walking on a public street implies consent to unwanted requests for spare change. There would be neither panhandlers nor telemarketers if both weren't profitable vocations. Just as some people willingly give a panhandler a quarter when solicited, some telemarketees willingly give $ to telemarketers. The state has no important interest in "protecting" people from irritating, but harmless, phone solicitation. The constitution protects the "sanctity of the home" from government invasion, not exposure to irritating private commercial messages (e.g. Old Navy TV ads). As I write this we received a telemarketing call; we said, "no thanks, please don't call us anymore," hung up, and moved on with life. Abolishing telemarketing means pushing them out of the headsets and cubicles and onto the sidewalks with their palms up.

Sam, I appreciate your views, although those of us who were getting as many as a half dozen of these jerks on the phone in a single evening have a different perspective.

When the constitutional amendment comes up for a vote, you can be one of the 1% that votes no.

I don't think it's been anyone's argument that the constitution protects the sanctity of the home against telemarketing. No one is arguing that telemarketing is unconstitutional. But that doesn't mean that prohibiting telemarketing is unconstitutional. It's very easy to blow off sales calls as "harmless" until you hear a bunch of senior citizens and people with disabilities talk about hauling their asses up and down the stairs to answer calls that turn out to be dead air because the telemarketing computer called 100 people to occupy its 25 operators, and unfortunately, 35 people were home, so ten of them got hung up on when they answered the phone. Or until you hear how people get the bejeezus scared out of them because they don't understand why they're getting six or eight hangup calls every night, not realizing that the hangup calls are from computers. I personally believe that had telemarketers been content to live within the logistical limitations that would be placed on them if they made a real live person make a real live phone call every time they wanted to call anyone, there's a good chance that this wouldn't be happening. There's only so much volume they could produce when they did business that way, and telemarketing survived for many years even though people didn't like it. It was the advent of predictive dialers and the like, technologies that have been exploited by marketers who simply decree that they will hang up on forty people rather than have one operator sit idle for fifteen seconds, that have forced the hand of regulators. These people have eaten themselves, and they have only themselves to blame. Courts decided a long time ago that it was all right to post a "No Solicitors" sign on your door and for it to be enforced through ordinances, despite the fact that door-to-door solicitation is protected speech also. As I said, had the marketers not gotten greedy and started cost-shifting onto consumers by making them waste their time jumping up to answer dead calls, I think there's a good chance they wouldn't be in this position.

Prohibiting telemarketing is unconstitutional; it violates the First Amendment. Predictive dialer abuse that results in barrages of hang-up calls to one phone in a short time may be some kind of tort that falls outside of First Amendment protection, like how a junk e-mail barrage that crashes a computer has been ruled trespassing. Similarly, repeatedly calling someone who has asked not to be called may be harrassment instead of protected speech. But laws against those things already exist, as do adequate private sector safeguards (e.g. those pre-recorded "if you are a solicitor, please hang up now" messages available to screen unrecognized calls, which are analagous to "no solicitors" signs). It's redundant, constitutionally risky, and silly for the government to restrict telemarketing speech with a "do not call registry." How about we set up a "do not show Gap ads on my TV registry" next? A constitutional amendment banning telemarketing is even sillier; it obscenely places this "problem" in the same league as involuntary servitude. An elderly or disabled person is very lucky if his most serious problem is having to haul his ass up and down the stairs to answer the phone. In a society that values unrestrained communication, we have to tolerate annoying, unwanted messages.

Such as yours. 8c)

You say that repeatedly calling someone who has asked not to be called could be illegal without offending the First Amendment? That's what the DNC registry is. It's a place to put your "I am asking not to be called" request. If you agree that there's no right to call the homes of people who have asked not to be called, then there's room for the registry within the bounds of what's constitutional. And one guy's version of what's "redundant" or "silly" has bupkus to do with what's constitutional. The Gap ad analogy doesn't work at all; you have to have your TV on to see a Gap ad. If they could turn your TV on remotely and show you a loud, annoying Gap ad while your kids were trying to sleep, then it would be a closer comparison. The "no solicitors" thing on your phone isn't a fair comparison, either; that generally requires you to pay a monthly service fee, and it's not currently enforceable by the government. If you'd be willing to have enforcement of the "Hang up if you're a solicitor" system by the government, just as the "No Solicitors" signs are enforceable by local ordinance and you can be fined for violating them, then we're closer, but in that case, then I really don't see how that's all that different from the DNC registry to begin with. If you wouldn't be willing to allow enforcement, then it's not going to be anything like a "No Solicitor" sign. One other thing -- in my opinion, calling somebody's phone and hanging up is not speech. Predictive dialers -- not only when "abused," but when used as intended -- are meant to call a certain number of people and hang up on them. That ain't speech, so to me, that's got zero constitutional protection, and the things could be entirely outlawed.

Jack: I thought this was an enjoyable, interesting debate. If you would rather I not participate anymore, I will stop. Sorry if I offended you. Thanks for the great tax teaching, and your blog is really good too. 80)

Sam: No, no! That was just a wisecrack that I couldn't resist making. No censorship here!

Jack: Thanks for the clarification. I suspected you added this awesome comment feature to your blog to facilitate debate; I just didn't want to continue commenting if the host finds my comments annoying and unwanted. I'm glad you don't, because I am itching to respond to Alli's last post, and I would also like to hear you tell me why I'm wrong.

Alli: Responsible telemarketers should maintain and abide by their own do-not-call lists. I don't know if existing law imposes penalties on telemarketers who fail to do so; if not, it should. But keeping the list is a function that belongs in the private sector, and allocating thinly stretched government resources to that function is wasteful, if not unconstitutional. The Oregon state government's priorities are seriously screwed up if it has a "DNC registry," because Oregon also has the shortest public school year in the nation, terrible roads, no social safety net, skyrocketing poverty, 8% unemployment, and no sales or property tax.

The Gap analogy works because you can choose to turn your phone's ringer off, or screen calls with your answering machine; i.e. you can choose to shut out telemarketers as well as TV ads. If you keep the phone in your baby's crib with the ringer set on "loud," yer gonna have trouble whether it's a telemarketer or grandma calling. There's no fee for screening your calls, and you can delete telemarketer's messages without listening to them.

I agree that calling someone and hanging up is definitely not protected speech, but harrassment, and predictive dialers should be illegal if that's what they're designed to do. But an enforcement mechanism is already available to protect you against someone who calls you repeatedly against your express wishes: it's called the POLICE and a RESTRAINING ORDER. The existence of "do not call" registries indicates that many Americans think the government owes them protection from having to answer the phone, and thus indicates that many Americans have lost all concept of real hardship.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics